(wikimedia.org) (wikimedia.org photo)
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Edwards Air Force Base. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Edwards Air Force Base. Sort by date Show all posts
Saturday, 1 December 2018
U.S. Government UFO Document:
“SUBJECT: UFO” (Page 5)
Date: 21 December 1965
(U.S.
Air Force, Washington , D.C. )
Source: NICAP.org
The document deals with the 7 October 1965 Edwards Air
Force Base, California ,
UFO incident.
The document was sent by Headquarters
Air Force
Flight Test
Center , Air Force Systems Command,
United States Air Force, Edwards Air Force Base, California ,
to FTD (TDFC), Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio .
The document is written by John D. Balent, Captain,
USAF, Technical Evaluation Officer, Deputy for Foreign Technology, for the
Commander.
Quote from the document (not written in U.S.
Department of Defense document format):
“1. The following report of UFOs is submitted per
para. 14, AFR 200-2 and 200-2A:
a. DESCRIPTION OF OBJECTS:
(1) All objects had the general shape and appearance
of stars.
(2) The largest appeared to be twice the size of an
ordinary star. The others were the same size as stars which would make them
about the size of a pinhead when held at arms length.
(3) The objects were the same color as stars.
(4) There were from 7 to 12 objects involved.
(5) There was
no discernible formation with one exception. Three of the objects appeared to
be in what might roughly be described as an inverted “V”.
(6) The objects that were held visually appeared to be
flashing red, green and white lights at one time or another.
(7) None
(8) None
(9) One of the objects was reported as “pushing a
small cloud” in front of it. This is the one object that could be explained. It
was a weather balloon.
b. DESCRIPTION OF COURSE OF OBJECTS:
(1) The Edwards tower operator first noticed flashing
lights from these objects in the normal course of his duties.
(2) The first and most prominent of these objects was
originally sighted at an elevation of 010° and an azimuth of 062°. The other objects appeared to have an
elevation of between 020 and 045° and azimuths of 050 to 075°. It is impossible
to determine just which of the radar contacts correlate with the visual
sightings. There were reports of up to 12 radar contacts from relatively
dispersed sites. LAADS received reports at various times from San Pedro,
Laguna, March AFB, and Boron. All were able to show contacts in the area under
consideration at one time or another during the 4½-hour period. The duration of
most of these contacts was very short. The three contacts which eventually figured
in the decision to scramble were U090, U091, and U092. LAADS did hold these
contacts in a close enough proximity to those under visual observation that
there is a possibility that they were the same.
(3) Of the seven objects
reported visually, four persisted longer than the others. The brightest, most
prominent of these was last seen flashing at an elevation of approximately 050°
and an azimuth of 135°. The other three were in what might rougly be described
as an inverted “V” and were last seen flashing at an elevation of 035° and
azimuths of from 140 to 150°. The remaining three, which were visible for a
shorter period of time, disappeared at approximately 045° elevation and in the
vicinity of 060 to 090° azimuth.
(4) The objects varied in their flight paths. A
general statement might be made that their main change was in altitude. There
were definite changes in azimuth but these were relatively small. The four
digits seen most clearly appeared to hover, then rise in a near vertical
direction. Only a general statement about the radar tracks is possible. All the
contacts obtained on search radar were difficult to hold because of slow speeds
involved. The height finding radar similarly had little luck in giving valid
changes in altitude. There was no discernible pattern to the flight paths of
objects when considered as a whole.
(5) Three of the objects held visually just gradually
faded from view. The four objects that were seen most clearly; i.e., the very
bright object and the three in an inverted “V” seemed to take their place among
the stars and persisted, looking like all the other stars, until dawn. These
objects possibly faded like the others and were replaced in the eyes of the
observers by the stars that happened to be in the area of last sighting.
(6) Again the objects were visible for varying lengths
of time. The first observation took place at 0833Z (0133 PDT). The four most
prominent objects flashed for about two hours. As mentioned above, these
objects persisted until dawn although they ceased flashing after two hours. The
other three objects were visible for approximately 30 minutes.
c. MANNER OF OBSERVATION:
(1) The objects were observed both visually and
electronically from the ground. Search, height finding, and approach radar all
held the objects.
(2) All ground observers used 7x50 binoculars.
(3) N/A
d. TIME AND DATE OF SIGHTING:
(1) 7 October 1965, 0133Z (correct time: 0133 PDT (see
b. 6))
(2) Night
e. LOCATION OF OBSERVERS:
(1) The observers were located at base operations, Edwards
AFB, Calif.
f. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ON OBSERVERS:
(1) Darryl Clark, Capt, 329th FIS, George AFB, Calif. , pilot. Capt.
Clark is an alert pilot with Det. 1 at Edwards AFB. He happened to be on duty
and was called upon to observe the activity. His observations were all made
from the ground.
(2) Charles A. Sorrels, SSgt, 1925 Communications Sq,
AFCS, tower operator.
(3) Forrest S. Honer, SSgt, Hq Sq Section, 6510th AB
Group, Edwards AFB, dispatcher.
(4) Keith C. Peneau, A2C, Det. 21, 6th Weather Wg,
weather observer.
All these observers are proficient in their particular
jobs and could be classified as very reliable.
g. WEATHER AND WINDS--ALOFT CONDITIONS AT TIME AND
PLACE OF SIGHTINGS:
(1) All observers agree that weather was clear and
visibility good.
h. ANY OTHER UNUSUAL ACTIVITY OR CONDITION:
(1) None
i. INTERCEPTION OR IDENTIFICATION ACTION TAKEN:
An F-106 was scrambled from George AFB at 1209Z (0509
PDT). The aircraft was was controlled throughout its search on a visual basis
by the Edwards tower. By the time the aircraft was scrambled the activity was
just about over. The objects that were held visually had ceased flashing and
had taken on the appearance of ordinary stars as mentioned earlier. Radar
contact was gone or was of insufficient duration to be used in vectoring the
aircraft. Passes were made through the area at 15,000, 20,000, and 40,000 ft . The only thing
out of the ordinary reported by the pilot was reflection of red lights from the
dry lake bed near Edwards. He felt that these were reflections from something
other than the beacons in the area.
j. During the period of the sightings there was no air
traffic nor were there balloon releases that might have been mistaken for the
objects.
k. COMMENTS:
In summary, no one in the Air Defense Sector could
provide a plausible explanation, nor did they seem overly concerned once the
incident was over. Their experience and the sources of information available to
them provided no help. There seems to be no question that they did have radar
control at several sites. The ground observers claim definitely to have seen
flashing lights for which they could offer or find no explanation. Everyone
concerned at both LAADS and Edwards seems convinced that something unusual
occurred.
l. EXISTENCE OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE:
There are radar scope photos which indicated
unidentified contacts were held. These scope photos are being forwarded as a
part of this report.”
“EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE” (af.mil):
Wikipedia article: “Edwards Air Force Base”:
Related posts:
(wikimedia.org image)
Runways on and near Rogers Dry Lake , at Edwards Air Force Base. Located in the Mojave Desert, California . (tex t by Wikipedia)
(wikimedia.org) (wikimedia.org photo)
(wikimedia.org) (wikimedia.org photo)
Air Force Rocket Research Laboratory Edwards AFRL site
UFO Case Directory (RADCAT):
“UFO Alert At Edwards AFB
Oct. 7, 1965
Edwards AFB & surrounding area”
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Francis
Ridge :
Oct. 7, 1965; Edwards AFB area, California
Up to twelve luminous UFOs flew over this secure test
facility and the region, and at least one F-106A interceptor was scrambled from
George AFB at Victorville. All of this action was captured on classified U.S.
Air Force audio tapes which have now been declassified and are available to the
public along with official documentation.The question in my mind is, what was
going on during those 3-4 hours we don’t know about? If we were allowed to hear
only 6 hours of 40, and read only 17
pages of hard-to-read documents, what is it we were NOT allowed to hear and
see? The documents we have make it clear that by the time Alpha Lima Zero One
was scrambled at at 1209Z or 5:09 PM PDT, ‘the activity was just about over.’
Joel Carpenter:
That evening, October 7 (and the following one,
October 8), 1965, some 700 engineers and scientists attended the Fourth X-15
Technical Conference at the (then) NASA
Flight Research
Center at Edwards AFB.
This dealt with the research results of the 150 some X-15 flights made since
1959. (Astronautics and Aeronautics 1965
NASA SP-4006, page 464 - Joel Carpenter)”
NICAP.org presents U.S. government (U.S. Air Force)
documents that pertain to the UFO case.
About RADCAT (tex t
by NICAP.org):
“RADCAT is a revitalized special project now being
conducted jointly by NICAP & Project 1947 with the help and cooperation of
the original compiler of RADCAT, Martin Shough, to create a comprehensive
listing of radar cases with detailed documentation from all previous
catalogues, including UFOCAT and original RADCAT.”
“EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE” (af.mil):
Wikipedia article: “Edwards Air Force Base”:
Related posts:
Runways on and near Rogers Dry Lake , at Edwards Air Force Base. Located
in the Mojave Desert, California .
(tex t by Wikipedia)
(wikimedia.org) (wikimedia.org photo)
(wikimedia.org) (wikimedia.org photo)
Saturday, 15 February 2020
UFO Journal Article:
“FOUR SAUCERS OVER CALIFORNIA AT SPEEDS UP TO 3600 M. P. H., REVEALED IN RADAR REPORT CERTIFIED BY NICAP BOARD MEMBERS –
Oxnard AFB Tells NICAP Intelligence Investigated UFO’s; AF Silent On Findings”
U.F.O. Investigator, July 1957, Vol. I, No. 1
(National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena, Washington , D.C. )
Source: NICAP.org
The whole article:
“CERTIFICATION BY MEMBERS OF THE
NICAP BOARD OF GOVERNORS
‘I certify I have seen the signed reports dated April 22 and May 18,
1957, describing the radar tracking of four UFO’s at speeds up to 3600 miles per hour.’
(Signed)
Reverend Albert Baller, Robbins
Memorial Church ,
Greenfield , Massachusetts .
Dr. Earl Douglass, author of the syndicated column, ‘Strength For The
Day,’ Princeton , New Jersey .
Frank Edwards, Radio and TV newscaster, Indianapolis , Indiana .
Col. Robert B. Emerson, U.S. Army Reserve, Director, Command and General
Staff Dept., 4157th USAR School, Baton Rouge, Iowa.
Reverend Leon Le Van, New Jerusalem Christian Church, Pittsburgh , Pennsylvania .
Professor Charles A. Maney, Head of the Department of Physics, Defiance University ,
Defiance , Ohio .
Rear Admiral Herbert B. Knowles, United States Navy, Retired, Elliott , Maine .
________________
The report cited was signed by one of four control-tower operators in
the Civil Aeronautics Administration, all of whom tracked the four saucers at a
large California
airport. Since this case is directly linked with the strange UFO sighting at
Oxnard Air Force Base, near midnight March 23, the operators will not be
identified. However, NICAP emphasizes that no violation of security is
involved, since there was no CIRVIS message (a report automatically classified
under JANAP 146, Joint Chiefs of Staff instructions).
Four flying saucers, clocked overCalifornia at 3600 mph , were tracked by
Civil Aeronautics control tower operators on the night of March 23, according
to a signed report now in NICAP’s possession. The radar report casts new light
on visual sightings at Oxnard Air Force Base — at the
same hour that night.
Four flying saucers, clocked over
At the time, the C.O. at Oxnard , Col E. F. Carey, Jr., stated that no
UFO’s had been picked up by his base radar. He also said that a jet pilot
ordered to search the area had seen nothing, though airmen, police and other
ground observers clearly saw a moving object which flashed a brilliant red
light.
At least one of the four UFO’s tracked by radar was
almost directly over Oxnard Air Force Base at this time, according to the CAA
control tower operator’s signed report (In the following account this radar
expert will be called Operator 1).
The time was 2350 (11:50 p.m.). With several other CAA
men, Operator 1 was on duty in the Municipal
Airport control tower, ————————, California .
‘I was watching to radar scope,’ his report states,
‘when I noticed a target (blip of a moving object) about 15 miles northwest and
moving northwest. At first I thought it was a jet, then I noticed it was moving
much faster than anything I had ever seen on the scope. About 40 miles northwest it came
to an abrupt stop and reversed course, all within a period of about three
seconds.
‘It then traveled back along its course for about 20 miles , reversed course
again and disappeared off the scope at 50 miles (Our radar reaches out only 50 miles ).’
Approximately five minutes later, Operator 1 reports,
two more unknown objects appeared, also traveling at tremendous speed. This
time, he quickly called on the other control-tower operators to help him track
the UFO’s.
‘These two disappeared off the scope in the same direction as the
first,’ Operator 1 states. ‘We had time to clock their speeds —
30 miles
in 30 seconds. This figures out to 3600 miles per hour.
‘A
minute or so later, a fourth target appeared in the same area,’ the radar
report continues. ‘It went off the scope at 3600 miles per hour. Our
radar does not give the height of aircraft; however, they had to be at 10,000 feet or lower, because our radar’s maximum
height range is about 10,000
feet .’
Next
day, Operator 1 read a newspaper account of the Oxnard Air Force Base
sightings. Included was a statement by Mrs. Robert Beaudoin, wife of an AF
captain stationed at the base. Just after midnight, Mrs. Beaudoin had
telephoned the base to report what she described as a ‘brilliant, flashing red
object’ in the sky over Santa
Rosa Valley .
Re-checking
the CAA radar observations, Operator 1 found that the UFO seen by Mrs. Beaudoin
and other witnesses was one of the four they had tracked. ‘This sighting,’ he
concludes, ‘was at exactly the same time as our radar sightings — 11:50 pm to
midnight.’
Immediately
after NICAP’s receipt of this radar report, a letter signed by the Director was
sent to Colonel Carey, requesting copies of the Oxnard AFB radar report and the
report by the jet pilot. On May 4, NICAP received an answer from the adjutant
of the 414th Fighter Group at Oxnard, which stated that ‘the UFO’s in question’
were investigated by the 4602 Air Intelligence Service Squadron (this squadron,
which has headquarters at the Air Defense Command, Ent Air Force Base, Colorado
Springs, has investigative teams at all Air Defense bases. The team which
investigated the Oxnard sightings came from
Norton AFB, California ).
A
NICAP letter to the 4602d, at Ent Field, brought an official answer signed by
Major John D. Taylor, Jr., Adjutant.
4602d
Denies Release
‘Current
Air Force policy,’ Major Taylor stated, ‘is that the issuance of such information
as you request can be made only by Headquarters ,
United States
Air Force. Therefore, your letter to the Commander, 414th Fighter Group was
forwarded, through channels, to Headquarters, USAF. Your letter of 8 May 1957
(a direct request ot the 4602d for the reports) will also be forwarded to
Headquarters, USAF.’
After
waiting eight days for word from the pentagon, NICAP telephoned a new request
to Maj. Gen. Joe W. Kelly, Director of Legislative Liaison, USAF, who for
several years has been the Secretary’s official spokesman on UFO subjects (Copy
of telegram and detailed request shown elsewhere in this issue).
In
a letter to Representative Lee Metcalf, of Montana , General Kelly had insisted that UFO
reports were not withheld from the press, and that information was supplied to
the press on any sighting which had drawn national attention.
Since
the Oxnard AFB sighting had been covered by press-wire stories, in hundreds of
newspapers, this obviously came under General Kelly’s policy declaration to
Congressman Metcalf. To conform to this Air Force policy, the NICAP request was
made to the Director, who is also Editor of the U.F.O. INVESTIGATOR.
To
date, NICAP has received no answer to its two letters or the telegram to
General Kelly (A public attack on NICAP was made by an unnamed Air Force
spokesman, three days after the wire to General Kelly, but this may have been
only a coincidence. NICAP does not believe that General Kelly was involved in
the attack, which is described in full, in another part of the magazine).
Because
of the obvious importance of the March 23 sightings, and the delay in receiving
the 4602d Intelligence Squadron’s investigation report, NICAP believes that its
members should be acquainted with all the facts, including the names of several
witnesses who apparently have been silenced.
For
details of the Pasadena and San
Gabriel reports, NICAP is indebted to Russ Leadabrand, columnist of
the Pasadena Independent,
who personally investigated the incidents, and also to Lee Pitt, aviation writer
of the Los Angeles
Mirror-News. Mr. Pitt obtained
additional information from a Ground Observer Corps identification expert, Les
Wagner, who has served as volunteer with the Pasadena Air
Filter Center
for six years.
* * * * *
The
first sighting on the night of March 23, or at least the first one listed, came
from K. E. Jefferson, a Pasadena
resident. At 9:55, Mr. Jefferson saw a brilliant, flashing object moving over Downey (about 5 miles southeast of Los Angeles ). Between that time and midnight,
similar UFO reports were made by many Californians in Los
Angeles , Pasadena , and throughout
the San Gabriel Valley .
Police
switchboards in the area were flooded with hundreds of calls, indicating that
probably several thousand people saw at least one UFO, perhaps more. During the
latter part of this period, both official and civilian reports poured into the Pasadena Air Filter Center .
According
to a statement given to Russ Leadabrand by the Filter Center C.O., Capt. Joseph
Fry, the first official report came in at 11:10 p.m., at which time Captain Fry
notified Air Defense radar.
‘Between
2310 (11:10 p.m.) and 2350,’
said Capt. Fry, ‘we had many reports. We had reports that indicated the UFO was
orange-red, flashing a bright white light. Some of the callers claimed they
heard th ‘sound of reports’ when the light flashed from the object.’
But
most observers, including two Filter
Center personnel,
described the object as showing a bright red light. One of the men was Air
Force T/Sgt. Dewey Crow, who is permanently attached to the Center. Until he
saw the object, he was openly sceptical about UFO’s.
The
second Filter Center observer was Les Wagner, whose
regular job is that of a Mirror-News
staff writer in charge of the air-movement identification section. During his
six years of GOC duty, Wagner has become an expert on aircraft identification.
While
hundreds of people along Pasadena ’s
Colorado Street
were staring up at the flashing UFO, T/Sgt. Crow and Wagner also watched it
move about the area. Their combined observations covered a period of more than
an hour. The two men admittedly were baffled.
Near
midnight, the tempo of UFO reports increased. It was just after twelve when
Mrs. Robert Beaudoin, wife of an Oxnard AFB captain, telephoned the base tower
from her home in Camarillo
Heights . Mrs. Beaudoin,
who is familiar with aircraft types positively described the UFO as a large,
silent object, flashing a brilliant red light and maneuvering in the sky over Santa Rosa Valley .
F-89
Fails to Contact UFO
In
rapid succession, other telephone calls — some from airmen attached to the base
— confirmed Mrs. Beaudoin’s report. Since the base already had an F-89 jet in
the air, the tower radioed the pilot to intercept the UFO, if possible (The
F-89 carries, besides the pilot, a radar operator specially trained for this
type of interception).
According
to the later report given to the press by Col. E. F. Carey, Jr., base
commander, the F-89 crew was unable to make any contact, visual or radar. This
attempted contact was timed at between midnight and 12:30. But at approximately
the same time (12:22 a.m.) several eye witnesses on the ground reported
sighting a strange flashing red object hovering near one of the Oxnard base
runways.
Three
of the witnesses were Ventura County deputy sheriffs from the Camarillo substation — Dick McKendry, John
Murphy, and Robert Corshaw. The three deputies on patrol in the
Ventura-Camarillo area not only saw the UFO hover near the field, but also
watched it maneuver swiftly about the valley until 1:37 a.m., when it quickly
disappeared on a northern course.
Meanwhile,
two policemen from Port Hueneme also had sighted the saucer and made a report,
which was relayed to the Oxnard
tower.
(At
an unspecified time, a Navy interceptor also joined in the search for the UFO,
according to the United Press. NICAP is attempting to identify the station from
which the plane was sent.)
From
the times and details given, it is not certain that all visual reports
concerned tha same UFO. It appears possible that witnesses may have seen two or
more of the four UFO’s tracked by the CAA control tower operators. If two or
more objects were seen separately this could account for the varied reports of
hovering, accelerations, and swift maneuvers. However, all these visual reports
may possibly concern a single object which maneuvered at varying speeds near
Oxnard AFB and the surrounding area.
Balloon
Ruled Out
When
the UFO was first sighted by T/Sgt. Dewey Crow and Les Wagner, in Pasadena, its
slow movement caused Wagner to check on the possibility of a balloon with anew
type of light (the combined visual and radar reports, covering tremendous
speeds and maneuvers, now appear to rule out and such answer completely).
Following
a Weather Bureau suggestion, Wagner checked with the Atomic Energy Commission’s
test site in Nevada .
The AEC stated the last balloon launching at the site had been on March 21, and
the balloon had been accounted for. In addition, a spokesman pointed out, their
balloons do not carry lights of anykind.
A
second check with, Edwards Air Force Base, ruled out the weather balloon
answer. No weather balloons carry red lights, Wagner was told. Also, the
balloons launched in the preceding 48 hours had been tracked to about 100,000 feet , where
they automatically were destroyed.
Finally,
the CAA also denied any connection with red-lighted balloon operations.
Though
the UFO reports bore no resemblance to any known type of aircraft, even those
still in the test stage, all aircraft operations in the area — military, civil
and special testing — were quickly screened by the Air Filter Center , and this answer was ruled out.
Following
Air Force Regulation 200-2, on the reporting of UFO’s, the Pasadena Filter
Center after the first verified UFO report, immediately notified Air Defense
Command HQ at Colorado Springs, the Air Technical Intelligence Center, the
Directorate of Intelligence at the Pentagon and the nearest Air Defense base —
Norton AFB, in San Bernardino. A team of Intelligence investigators from the 4602d
Squadron unit at Norton was at once sent to Oxnard AFB.
Though
this is standard procedure, and is well known to the HQ staff at all Air Force
bases, no mention of the 4602d was made when Russ Leadabrand called the base at
Norton. Major Thomas Bowers, Information Services Officer of the 27th Air
Division, admitted they had received a number of civilian reports on the UFO.
‘They
came from Los Angeles , Pasadena ,
and eventually the Oxnard
area,’ he told Leadabrand.
‘Were
you able to identify the object?’ the columnist asked Major Bowers.
‘Negative,’
Bowers answered. ‘We were not able to pick up the object on radar. No Air Force
personnel saw the object (This contradicts the report by T/Sgt. Dewey Crow).’
He
added that a full report of the sighting was being sent to ATIC. ‘I believe the
Technical Intelligence people are working out of Wright-Patterson,’ he added.
Major
Bowers’ failure to mention the swift on-the-spot investigation by a 4602d team
from his own base may have no real significance, since the Oxnard AFB adjutant
did not hesitate to inform NICAP of this fact.
But
except for this official admission to NICAP and the subsequent confirmation
sent to NICAP by the 4602d Headquarters adjutant, no official information has
been released since the incidents occurred.
Instead,
several of the witnesses named have either refused to answer queries or their
superiors have kept them from answering.
On
April 25, NICAP wrote to Mrs. Beaudoin and asked fro detailed information on
the sighting. To date, there has been no reply.
AF
Silences Sheriff’s Men
On
the same date, NICAP also wrote to the Sheriff of Ventura County, California,
and requested that the three deputies named: McKendry, Murphy and Corshaw, be
permitted to forward all possible details and also their personal opinions on
the sighting. On May 15, NICAP received a reply from Sheriff William J. Suytar,
stating that all the information they had on this sighting was turned over to
the officials at Oxnard Air Force Base. It was evident that he had been ordered
to neither furnish the reports NICAP had requested, nor permit his men to be
interviewed by a NICAP representative in Ventura .
‘We
would be most happy,’ Sheriff Suytar told NICAP, ‘to cooperate in having these
officers available for interview by any duly authorized military officer.’
Once
the Air Force gave him such an order, neither an admiral on the Navy, an Army
general, nor even a high-ranking Air Force officer could interview the deputies
without approval by AF Intelligence.
From
the foregoing evidence, it appears that highly important facts about the March
23 California
sightings are being withheld from the public.
This
case is still being investigated by NICAP, but a complete analysis by NICAP’s
Special Advisers is not possible without the report of the 4602 Intelligence
Squadron, now at Air Force Headquarters.
Pending
AF action on NICAP’s request for this report, under the policy stated by
General Kelly, anyone in the United
States with authentic information or
personal knowledge of the facts is requested to send a report to NICAP — unless this would be an actual violation of
military security.
NICAP
UFO-report forms will be sent on request, and names will be kept confidential
if so requested.
When additional verified information is received, whether on the actual sightings or on the Air Force investigation, this will be goven to members, to Congress, and the press, either by special bulletin or through the [U.F.O.] INVESTIGATOR.”
Wikipedia article: “Oxnard Air Force Base”:
The whole Wikipedia article:
“Oxnard Air Force Base is a former United States Air Force base, located
in the city of Camarillo , California .
History
Related posts:
(tageo.com photo)
(lib.utexas.edu image)
Tuesday, 22 January 2019
UFO Case Directory (RADCAT):
“Green & Red Object Circles Jet,
Tracked on Radar (BBU 3969)
Feb. 12, 1956
SW of Goose Bay, Labrador”
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Dan Wilson:
At 10:55 local time two F-89’ s were on a routine training
mission when one fighter (with pilot Bowen and radar observer Crawford) had
visual and radar contact with an object which rapidly encircled the the F-89D.
The color of the object was predominatley green with red and seemed to be
flashing. The object was estimated to be 3/4 mile away and was observed for
about one minute. The other fighter aircraft also had radar contact. About 15
minutes later an object was observed on radar 38 miles SW of Goose Bay
by aircraft controllers. No movement. The fighters were vectored upon the
object and had radar contact but faded when the aircraft got within 8 miles . (Berliner; FUFOR
Index)”
NICAP.org presents U.S. government (U.S. Air Force)
documents that pertain to the UFO case.
Wikipedia article: “CFB Goose Bay ”:
Quote from the Wikipedia article:
“Canadian Forces Base Goose Bay (IATA: YYR, ICAO:
CYYR), commonly referred to as CFB Goose Bay, is a Canadian Forces Base located
in the municipality of Happy Valley-Goose Bay in the province of Newfoundland
and Labrador. It is operated as an air force base by the Royal Canadian Air
Force (RCAF). Its primary RCAF lodger unit is 5 Wing, commonly referred to as 5
Wing Goose Bay.
Cold War history
1950 – The Rivière-du-Loup Incident
Goose Air Base was the site of the first US nuclear
weapons in Canada, when in 1950 the United States Air Force Strategic Air
Command stationed 11 model 1561 Fat Man atomic bombs at the base in the summer,
and flew them out in December.[12] While returning to Davis–Monthan Air Force
Base with one of the bombs on board, a USAF B-50 heavy bomber encountered
engine trouble, had to drop, and conventionally detonate, the bomb over the St.
Lawrence, contaminating the river with uranium-238.
1954 – Construction of the Strategic Air
Command Weapons Storage Area[4]
Construction of Strategic Air Command's Weapons
Storage Area at Goose Air Base was officially completed in 1954.[13] The area
was surrounded by two fences, topped with barbed wire. It was the highest
security area in Goose Air Base and comprised
* One guard house
* One administration building
* Three warehouses (base spares #1, base spares #2,
supply warehouse)
* Six guard towers
* One plant group building
* Five earth covered magazines for non-nuclear weapon
storage
* Four earth covered magazines for ‘pit’ storage
(constructed with vaults and shelving to store pit ‘birdcages’)
Design and layout of the Goose Air Base weapons
storage area was identical, with only slight modifications for weather and
terrain, to the three Strategic Air Command weapons storage areas in Morocco located
at Sidi Slimane Air Base, Ben Guerir Air Base, and Nouasseur Air Base, which
were constructed between 1951 and 1952 as overseas operational storage sites.
The last nuclear bomb components that were being stored at the Goose Air Base
weapons storage area were removed in June 1971.[14]
1958 – Construction of the Air Defence Command
ammunition storage area[4]
Construction of the Air Defence Command ammunition
storage area at Goose Air Base was completed in 1958.[15] This extension to the
Strategic Air Command weapons storage area was built directly beside the
previously constructed area, with a separate entrance. The buildings built
within the area were:
* Three storage buildings
* One guard house
* One missile assembly building.
The storage was being built to accommodate components
of the GAR-11/AIM-26 "Nuclear" Falcon, which is normally stored in
pieces, requiring assembly before use.
1976 – Departure of the USAF Strategic Air
Command and closure of Goose
AB [4]
The former U.S.
facilities were re-designated CFB
Goose Bay
(the second time this facility name has been used). The value of the airfield
and facilities built and improved by the USAF since 1953 and transferred to Canada
were estimated in excess of $250 million (USD).[citation needed]. By 1976 all
Strategic Air Command assets had been stood down, and only USAF logistical and
transport support remained.
Hosted deployments of units from:
Royal Air Force (United Kingdom ) 1942–2005[1]
Wikipedia article: “Northrop F-89 Scorpion”:
Quote from the Wikipedia article:
“The Northrop F-89 Scorpion was an American
all-weather interceptor built during the 1950s, the first jet-powered aircraft
designed for that role from the outset to enter service.[3] Though its straight
wings limited its performance, it was among the first United States Air Force
(USAF) jet fighters equipped with guided missiles and notably the first combat
aircraft armed with air-to-air nuclear weapons (the unguided Genie rocket).”
Related posts:
U.S. Air Force Northrop F-89D-45-NO Scorpion
interceptors of the 59th Fighter Interceptor Squadrons, Goose Bay AB, Labrador
(Canada), in the 1950s. 52-1959
in foreground, now in storage at Edwards AFB, California (text by Wikipedia)
(wikimedia.org)
(wikimedia.org photo)
(tageo.com photo)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





