Friday, 17 January 2020
Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO News Articles From the Year 1994
Website: Newspapers.com (owned by Ancestry.com LLC, Lehi , Utah ):
(Search term: “Unidentified Flying Object” “1994” )
(“Unidentified Flying Objects” “1994” )
(“UFO” “1994” )
(“UFOs” “1994” )
(“Unidentified Object” “1994” )
(“Unidentified Objects” “1994” ) (no results as of 17
January 2020)
(“Flying Object” “1994” )
(“Flying Objects” “1994” )
(“Flying Saucer” “1994” )
(“Flying Saucers” “1994” )
(“Flying Disc” “1994” )
(“Flying Discs” “1994” )
(“Flying
Disk” “1994” )
(“Flying Disks” “1994” )
UFO news article:
“Residents report odd lights”
17 November 1994
(The Taos News, New Mexico )
The whole article:
“If you happened to be outside at night last September and saw a strange
glowing object moving across the sky, you were not alone.
People from New Mexico to Alaska have reported seeing a large number of
unidentified flying objects, enough to be called a major ‘flap’ by officials of
the UFO Reporting
Center in Seattle , Washington .
Incidents were reported above Amor
Lane near Taos
High School and at other areas in Taos in September,
according to a story in the Monday (Nov. 14) issue of The Santa Fe New Mexican.
Maida Martinez, her husband Toby, and Eric Tafoya of Taos all reported
seeing an object described as a ‘bright, white light, accompanied by about a dozen
smaller lights’ flying low over populated areas of Taos.
Air Force bases in New Mexico and the
Federal Aviation Administration in Albuquerque
declined to comment on the sightings.
Northern New Mexico and southern Colorado
have bee the center of dozens of UFO sightings since the late 1960s, some
apparently linked to reports of cattle mutilations.”
Related
posts:
(tageo.com photo)
Thursday, 16 January 2020
UFO Article:
“The Pentagon Explains WHY They
Changed Past UFO Statements”
By John Greenewald, Jr., 9 January 2020
(The Black Vault, Castaic , California )
The article reports on how Pentagon has changed its
statements about the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP).
To tell a nation’s citizens what goes on in the skies
does not reveal sources and methods, as far as I am concerned.
So why are so many governments around the world so
afraid of telling us what flies around in the airspace (and in space) above the
Earth – and from time to time, land on the ground?
In my opinion – most governments (at least many
military officials) know full well that unknown, seemingly manufactured objects
fly around in our skies and enter our seas, oceans and lakes at will!
The citizenry in every nation have the right to be informed
about the UFO situation at all times.
Related posts:
The Pentagon (2008), Arlington , Virginia
(wikimedia.org photo)
UFO Article (Blog):
“Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) Admits to ‘TOP SECRET’ Records and ‘SECRET’ Video From USS Nimitz ‘Tic Tac’ UFO Incident”
By Paul Dean, 8 January 2020
(UFOs – Documenting The Evidence, Melbourne , Australia )
Quote from the article:
“Evidently, the ONI’s response contains numerous
issues worth raising. The ONI reviewed their ‘records and systems’ but found
‘no releasable records’ regarding the USS Nimitz ‘Tic Tac’ UFO event. At first
glance, this implies that they have nothing themselves to release. But
interpreted slightly differently, the statement could also suggest that they in
fact do have internal, homegrown records, but those records off limits. This,
however, seems unlikely, due to the candid admissions that come next. During
these searches, ONI discovered records originating from another agency.
Designated as ‘briefing slides’, these items were deemed to be ‘classified TOP
SECRET’ under the well-worn Executive Order 13526, and the originating
authority determined that they must stay that way. The reasons given relate,
firstly, to ‘Intelligence Activities of the United States’ and ‘Sources and
Methods’ which are used to collection national security information, and,
secondly, to ‘Scientific and Technological Matters’ related, again, to national
security. Finally, the ONI admits to possessing a video which is currently
classified ‘SECRET’. Again, the ONI has no authority to declassify it, but they
did at least confess to who does. The originating agency is acknowledged as the
Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR).”
Wikipedia article: “Naval Air Systems Command”:
Related posts:

(wikimedia.org image)
UFO News Article (Blog):
“Ex Navy boss stumped by UFOs”
By Billy Cox, 9 January 2020
(De Void, Sarasota Herald-Tribune , Florida )
Quote from the article:
“Milestone: This
is De Void’s first UFO story to make the Herald-Tribune’s print edition. Please
note the direct style, as well as the paucity of adverbs and meaningless
tangents.”
‘I’ve seen the videos and, at least in my time, most
of the assessments were inconclusive as to what it was,’ said retired Admiral
Gary Roughead, following a speaking engagement in Sarasota . ‘But the whole issue of defense
against autonomous vehicles is one that the Department is taking pretty darned
seriously.’
Three sets of gun-camera videos – one taken from an
F-18 assigned to the USS Nimitz operating off southern California in November
2004, and two more from Super Hornets attached to the USS Roosevelt during
maneuvers off Jacksonville in January 2015 – were authenticated as official
government footage by the Defense Department last year.”
Wikipedia article: “Gary Roughead”:
Related posts:
Admiral Gary Roughead, U.S. Navy (2007)
(wikimedia.org photo)
Monday, 13 January 2020
UFO Report:
“The 1963 UFO Chronology”
Created: 14 May 2006
Updated: 17 March 2017
(NICAP.org)
Quote from the UFO report:
“This is an 8-page chronology of UFO incidents for
1963. From August 4th into mid-month, there was a flurry of UFO sightings, mostly
in southern Illinois .
An advertising plane in the Chicago
area caused some erroneous reports about the same time. Once the reports had
been publicized, the planet Jupiter also was reported as a UFO on a few
occasions. Our Vincennes , Indiana , NICAP Subcommittee investigated
several of the key cases, submitting taped interviews and investigation
reports. Our thanks for these chronologies must go to our documentation team:
William Wise (Project Blue Book Archive), Dan Wilson (archive researcher), and
Brad Sparks (Comprehensive Catalog of Project Blue Book Unknowns). Last, but
not least, our thanks to Jean Waskiewicz who created the online NICAP DBase
(NSID) that helped make it possible to link from the cases to the reports
themselves.
NICAP Site Coordinator”
Related posts:
(lib.utexas.edu image)
U.S. Government UFO Document:
“PROJECT 10073 RECORD (CARD):
DATE - TIME GROUP: 17 May 67/
LOCATION: Rural Hall, North Carolina”
(Project Blue Book , U.S. Air Force, Washington , D.C. )
Source: Fold3.com, Lindon , Utah
Quote from the document:
“(2 Witnesses)
Object was round, similar to a small aircraft. Bright
orange in color. Object was passing back and forth over a jet aircraft that was
heading NE. Aircraft flew in a straight pattern, but the object flew in a
zig-zag pattern.”
Project Blue Book listed
the case as “UNIDENTIFIED.”
Wikipedia article: “Rural Hall , North Carolina ”:
(tageo.com photo)
UFO Case Directory (ANRECAT):
“Rotating Object & Animal Reaction
Feb. 15, 1963
Willow Grove, Australia”
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Keith Basterfield:
February
15, 1963; Willow Grove, Australia
7:10 hrs local time. Farmer Charles Brew and his son
Trevor were in a milking shed, milking a herd of cows. Charles saw an object
descend very steeply out of the east out of low cloud, at about a forty-five
degree angle. The object was described as about 25 feet in diameter, and
about 9-10 feet
high. The lower portion, about three feet high, was rotating in an
anti-clockwise direction, and was of a bluish appearance. The upper portion of
the object appeared to be stationary; battleship grey in colour, with a
transparent dome on top. Protruding out of this dome was something which
resembled a broom handle. A sound, described as a ‘swishing’ or ‘burbling’ was
heard by Charles and also by Trevor. Trevor did not see the object due to his
position in the milking shed. The weather at the time was described as low
cloud, with rain. Visibility was poor with no thunder or lightning. The wind
Charles said, was from the east. The object travelled across the sky, and using
a tree for a reference, Charles estimated the object came as close as 75 feet . When due north of
him, it hovered over a tree for a few seconds, and then took off to the W at a
very fast speed, at an estimated 45 degree angle and lost in the low cloud. The
total duration was 15-16 seconds. Cows, and a nearby horse, reacted by running
away from the shed area. Charles reported he had a headache (an unusual
occurrence for him) following the event, which lasted a day. He also reported a
slight drop in milk production from the herd, over the week following the
incident. (Sources: (1) RAAF file series A703, control symbol 580-1-1 part 4,
pp373-390. This has detailed interview notes; sketches and map. (2) Transcript
of interview between the Brews and the Victorian UFO Research Society. 1963.
(3) Interview between the Brews and J E McDonald in 1967. (4) A series of blog
posts by Keith Basterfield, bringing all the available Moe material into one
place).”
Wikipedia article: “Willow Grove , Victoria ”:
Related posts:
(tageo.com photo)
UFO Case Report (E-mail):
“Subject: Merced CA, April 4, 1949”
By Joan Woodward, Animal Reaction Specialist, 3
December 2005
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Animal Reaction Feature:
At 10:20 PM, the witness and his dog went outdoors. The
witness heard an intense clicking sound coming from the sky and saw a dark
object as it moved against the background of stars. The witness described his
dog’s reaction as follows: ‘My dog was with me and directed her attention in
the general direction of this object’s flight throughout its course. She had
been romping with me on coming out of the house but without spoken word [she]
stopped and directed her attention to the previously described area [dark
object flight path].’
The sighting:
This sighting is listed as a Blue Book unknown.
Weather: Castle
AFB weather station
reported thin/broken clouds at 20,000 feet , 12 mile visibility and
surface winds as north at 9
mph . The witness reported his area (1 mile west of Merced and 7
miles south of Castle AFB )
was more sheltered and had no appreciable surface wind.
The witness is a Major in the Active USAF Reserves. He
is a pilot, with 2200 hours flight time, including night flying in WWII. He reported the sighting to the Intelligence
Officer at Castle Field.
Duration of sighting: 35-45 seconds (including sound
and visual)
The witness came outdoors with his dog and heard a ‘clicking
noise of considerable intensity.’ He stopped, locating the sound as coming from
the sky about 40 degrees from eastern horizon.
He observed a dark shape moving against the background of stars in a
flight path to the West or NW.
He described the object as a solid mass whose size he
estimated as 4-5 feet
in diameter and whose altitude he estimated as considerably less than 1,000 feet . On two occasions the reflection of
streetlights, located ½ block behind the witness, made the object appear to
have a dull-surface and one of light colored metal. Also, the reflection of the
streetlights off the surface of the object made the witness think that the
under-surface was curved. No exhaust trail was seen. No lights or flame
observed. No whistle or roar, only a clicking sound that maintained the same
pitch and speed, but altered in loudness (see below). The clicking sound was
compared to the beaters of a home mixer that were not properly meshed.
The dark object moved slowly going the West or NW,
made a 90-degree-arc turn to the South or SW. The clicking sound became louder
on the new heading. The clicking sound stopped when it was the loudest
(seemingly overhead relative to the witness) and the witness was unable to
detect the object after the sound ceased.
No EM effects or physiological effects were reported.
Source:
Memorandum to Director, FBI, from SAC, Los Angeles , dated May
13, 1949. Copy of the memorandum came
from MUFON Files with thanks to John Schuessler. Memo copied below:”
Related posts:
(tageo.com
photo)
Saturday, 11 January 2020
UFO Case Directory (ANRECAT):
“Former Pilot’s Dog Reacts
April 4, 1949
Merced, California”
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Joan Woodward:
April 4, 1949; Merced ,
California (BBU)
10:20 p.m. Major William Parrott, former Air Force
pilot, saw a generally round object with curved bottom and dull coloring,
giving off clicking sound until overhead. Parrott’s dog reacted. (Berliner) 35 secs”
Related
posts:
(tageo.com
photo)
UFO Case Report (E-mail):
“Subject: Emden MO, July 13, 1973”
By Joan Woodward, Animal Reaction Specialist, 11 April
2006
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
The whole UFO case report:
“Animal Reaction Feature:
A dog that was normally outdoors at night and that
normally barked at and chased any animal that came near the house, began
barking at 3:30 AM. This barking was unusual, described as a ‘scared’ bark,
causing the witness to get up and see what was happening.
The dog was barking at a glowing object and would not
leave the porch. Normally in that situation, the dog would take off after
whatever had attracted its attention. The witness stated that this night the
dog was clearly afraid and continued barking from the porch and would not leave
the porch.
The witness also noted he heard cattle bellowing on a
hill, and when the light moved off, he heard neighbor’s dogs start barking. [No
information was given on the location of the cattle or of the neighbor’s house
relative to witness and the unknown light.—jw]
The Sighting:
The object was described as egg shaped or oblong,
about the size of an average car. It had
a 3-dimensional appearance, ‘like you could look through it, or right into it.’ The outside was orange and toward the center
it was brighter and a slightly different color.
The colors were described as similar to setting sun but not dark enough
to be considered red. The night was very quiet with no wind.
The witness made an effort to hear any sound from the
object but heard nothing. He noted that
even when the object started moving, he still could hear nothing.
The object, judging by a tree in front of it, was
estimated to be 20 feet
or less from the ground and was in the area of a clearing. It remained still
and in view for about 10 minutes. Then
the witness’s wife, watching from indoors while he watched from the porch,
turned on house lights. At that point, the object flickered slightly and
started moving away slowly and steadily, maintaining its low altitude. It speed
was estimated as 5 mph
and it was moving in a northwest direction. The object was lost to sight after
after 20 seconds as it became obscured by trees. The witness heard the
neighbor’s dogs start barking about 3 minutes later. [The only direction
indicated was that the glowing object disappeared moving to the NW. Using
YourSky (fourmilab.ch/yoursky/) to see if any bright objects were near the
horizon at the time of the sighting, I found Mars was roughly 35° in the SE
sky, unlikely a factor. However, the 97%
illuminated moon was due to set 4:05 AM
(verified with USNO) and would have been very near the horizon SW horizon. I
cannot say the setting moon was or was not involved in this sighting without
directions and knowledge of the topography. The witness reports the dog was
reacting in the direction of the glowing object, suggesting something was
happening other than the moon setting. However, it is always possible that the
dog was reacting to something other than what the witness was watching.—jw]
Source:
<>SKYLOOK, No. 69, August 1973, page 13
SKYLOOK,
No. 70, September 1973, pages 14-15”
My comment:
The October 1975 Espevær
(island), Norway ,
UFO landing incident involved dogs that barked hysterically. Several dog owners said their dogs had never earlier
reacted like they did that evening.
Related posts:
(tageo.com photo)
UFO Case Directory (IMCAT):
“Skylab III Photo Incident
September 20, 1973
In Orbit, Over SW Indian Ocean”
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Fran Ridge:
Sept. 20, 1973; In orbit over Indian
Ocean
During revolution # 1863. Astronauts Alan Bean, Owen
Garriott and Jack Lousma spotted what they described as a red ‘satellite’,
which they photographed (4 color photos) and mentioned during a subsequent
debriefing. We have radio conversation (transcript only) with Houston CapCom
about 4.5 hours after the sighting of this object. There was no man-made
satellite that could explain this sighting and hence the object was truly
anomalous. This case is multiply-listed as a Cat 8 (photo), Cat 11 (sighting
from air/spacecraft), and flagged as a NASA incident. 10 mins. Distance from
Skylab was 25-30 miles .
Estimated diameter was 800
feet .
Joel Carpenter:
One of the things that’s so darn fascinating about
this case is something that Dr Maccabee and Brad Sparks bring up in the article
on Maccabee’s site. One interpretation of the sighting is that the object was
approaching on an orbit in a 51 or 52 degree inclination and about to intersect
with Skylab’s 50 degree (but much higher) orbit. They mention that that
inclination was used by the Soviets. But actually, they often used 65 degrees.
51 degrees was used for certain very specific flights: the Salyut space
stations and the manned Soyuz ships that docked with them. At the time of the
sighting, Salyut-1 and Salyut-2 had been flown, and both had failed. Salyut-2
was launched in April 1973 and was actually the top secret Almaz military
station, the counterpart of the US MOL reconnaissance space station. Salyut-2
had recon gear aboard, but failed before it was manned for the first time,
about 2 weeks after it was launched.
Brad
Sparks:
Skylab-3 remains a mystery with the color photos and
optical ranging yielding an approximate 800-foot size of the space UFO, much
larger than the largest satellite then in space (the 150-foot Skylab-3). [Sparks interviewed
Skylab-3 astronaut Dr. Owen Garriott shortly after the return to earth - Fran
Ridge].”
My comment:
My comment:
“There was no man-made
satellite that could explain this sighting and hence the object was truly
anomalous,” Francis L. Ridge writes. This means that this is one of the UFO
cases that prove that UFOs are as real as airliners flying overhead.
Related
posts:
The Skylab III UFO
(google.com photo)
Wednesday, 8 January 2020
Google Website Searches:
Focus On 1973 UFO Incidents, Reports & Articles
Website: National Investigations Committee on Aerial
Phenomena (NICAP.org):
(Search term: “January 1973” )
(“February 1973” )
(“March 1973” )
(“April 1973” )
(“May 1973” )
(“June 1973” )
(“July 1973” )
(“August 1973” )
(“September 1973” )
(“October 1973” )
(“November 1973” )
(“December 1973” )
NOTE: Click on the link, “repeat the search with the
omitted results included,” to find every web page.
Related posts:
realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=1973
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

_Adm._Gary_Roughead.jpg)

