Friday, 17 January 2020
UFO News Article:
“Seminar looks at mutilations”
26 May 1994
(The Taos News, New Mexico )
Quote from the article:
“A spate of unusual animal deaths an Taos and Colfax
County has a number of
ranchers and townsfolk worried — and watching the skies.
Described as classic examples of ‘cattle mutilations,’
the animal deaths reportedly have been occurring near Questa, Eagle Nest and Taos within the past few
months.
…
[Gail] Staehlin said 17 mutilation cases were reported
in the region last year and five so far this spring. She added that usually
only one in six cases is reported to authorities.
According to speakers, reports of animals being killed
in similar manner reached a peak during the mid-1970s, with most occurring in
northern New Mexico and southern Colorado .
‘We live in the place where it started, the
epicentre,’ [Christopher] O’Brien said. ‘This is the home of this thing.’
…
Information provided at the seminar also concluded the
incidents may be tied to space aliens, unidentified flying objects, …
…
A number of cases have been reported in the Taos area. The first
specific mention of local incidents in which the term ‘cattle mutilations’
appeared was in a June 24, 1976, The Taos News article by Paul C. Merz
Merz reported that a mutilated cow was found May 13, 1976, near Pot Mountain ,
across the John Dunn Bridge
west of Arroyo Hondo. Several at the time appeared to have occurred near the
13th day of each month, he wrote.
Gabe Valdez, a state police officer from Dulce, was quoted as saying of
a June 13 incident that he saw ‘some type of aircraft,’ which landed near the
carcass af a mutilated cow and ‘scorched grass’ on the mesa about 550 feet from it.
...
A The Taos News article by Phil Bateman from Dec. 21, 1978, speculated a
UFO sighting in Ranchitos [Ranchito] that July was tied to another round of mysterious animal deaths.”
(tageo.com photo)
Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO News Articles From the Year 1994
Website: Newspapers.com (owned by Ancestry.com LLC, Lehi , Utah ):
(Search term: “Unidentified Flying Object” “1994” )
(“Unidentified Flying Objects” “1994” )
(“UFO” “1994” )
(“UFOs” “1994” )
(“Unidentified Object” “1994” )
(“Unidentified Objects” “1994” ) (no results as of 17
January 2020)
(“Flying Object” “1994” )
(“Flying Objects” “1994” )
(“Flying Saucer” “1994” )
(“Flying Saucers” “1994” )
(“Flying Disc” “1994” )
(“Flying Discs” “1994” )
(“Flying
Disk” “1994” )
(“Flying Disks” “1994” )
UFO news article:
“Residents report odd lights”
17 November 1994
(The Taos News, New Mexico )
The whole article:
“If you happened to be outside at night last September and saw a strange
glowing object moving across the sky, you were not alone.
People from New Mexico to Alaska have reported seeing a large number of
unidentified flying objects, enough to be called a major ‘flap’ by officials of
the UFO Reporting
Center in Seattle , Washington .
Incidents were reported above Amor
Lane near Taos
High School and at other areas in Taos in September,
according to a story in the Monday (Nov. 14) issue of The Santa Fe New Mexican.
Maida Martinez, her husband Toby, and Eric Tafoya of Taos all reported
seeing an object described as a ‘bright, white light, accompanied by about a dozen
smaller lights’ flying low over populated areas of Taos.
Air Force bases in New Mexico and the
Federal Aviation Administration in Albuquerque
declined to comment on the sightings.
Northern New Mexico and southern Colorado
have bee the center of dozens of UFO sightings since the late 1960s, some
apparently linked to reports of cattle mutilations.”
Related
posts:
(tageo.com photo)
Thursday, 16 January 2020
UFO Article:
“The Pentagon Explains WHY They
Changed Past UFO Statements”
By John Greenewald, Jr., 9 January 2020
(The Black Vault, Castaic , California )
The article reports on how Pentagon has changed its
statements about the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP).
To tell a nation’s citizens what goes on in the skies
does not reveal sources and methods, as far as I am concerned.
So why are so many governments around the world so
afraid of telling us what flies around in the airspace (and in space) above the
Earth – and from time to time, land on the ground?
In my opinion – most governments (at least many
military officials) know full well that unknown, seemingly manufactured objects
fly around in our skies and enter our seas, oceans and lakes at will!
The citizenry in every nation have the right to be informed
about the UFO situation at all times.
Related posts:
The Pentagon (2008), Arlington , Virginia
(wikimedia.org photo)
UFO Article (Blog):
“Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) Admits to ‘TOP SECRET’ Records and ‘SECRET’ Video From USS Nimitz ‘Tic Tac’ UFO Incident”
By Paul Dean, 8 January 2020
(UFOs – Documenting The Evidence, Melbourne , Australia )
Quote from the article:
“Evidently, the ONI’s response contains numerous
issues worth raising. The ONI reviewed their ‘records and systems’ but found
‘no releasable records’ regarding the USS Nimitz ‘Tic Tac’ UFO event. At first
glance, this implies that they have nothing themselves to release. But
interpreted slightly differently, the statement could also suggest that they in
fact do have internal, homegrown records, but those records off limits. This,
however, seems unlikely, due to the candid admissions that come next. During
these searches, ONI discovered records originating from another agency.
Designated as ‘briefing slides’, these items were deemed to be ‘classified TOP
SECRET’ under the well-worn Executive Order 13526, and the originating
authority determined that they must stay that way. The reasons given relate,
firstly, to ‘Intelligence Activities of the United States’ and ‘Sources and
Methods’ which are used to collection national security information, and,
secondly, to ‘Scientific and Technological Matters’ related, again, to national
security. Finally, the ONI admits to possessing a video which is currently
classified ‘SECRET’. Again, the ONI has no authority to declassify it, but they
did at least confess to who does. The originating agency is acknowledged as the
Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR).”
Wikipedia article: “Naval Air Systems Command”:
Related posts:

(wikimedia.org image)
UFO News Article (Blog):
“Ex Navy boss stumped by UFOs”
By Billy Cox, 9 January 2020
(De Void, Sarasota Herald-Tribune , Florida )
Quote from the article:
“Milestone: This
is De Void’s first UFO story to make the Herald-Tribune’s print edition. Please
note the direct style, as well as the paucity of adverbs and meaningless
tangents.”
‘I’ve seen the videos and, at least in my time, most
of the assessments were inconclusive as to what it was,’ said retired Admiral
Gary Roughead, following a speaking engagement in Sarasota . ‘But the whole issue of defense
against autonomous vehicles is one that the Department is taking pretty darned
seriously.’
Three sets of gun-camera videos – one taken from an
F-18 assigned to the USS Nimitz operating off southern California in November
2004, and two more from Super Hornets attached to the USS Roosevelt during
maneuvers off Jacksonville in January 2015 – were authenticated as official
government footage by the Defense Department last year.”
Wikipedia article: “Gary Roughead”:
Related posts:
Admiral Gary Roughead, U.S. Navy (2007)
(wikimedia.org photo)
Monday, 13 January 2020
UFO Report:
“The 1963 UFO Chronology”
Created: 14 May 2006
Updated: 17 March 2017
(NICAP.org)
Quote from the UFO report:
“This is an 8-page chronology of UFO incidents for
1963. From August 4th into mid-month, there was a flurry of UFO sightings, mostly
in southern Illinois .
An advertising plane in the Chicago
area caused some erroneous reports about the same time. Once the reports had
been publicized, the planet Jupiter also was reported as a UFO on a few
occasions. Our Vincennes , Indiana , NICAP Subcommittee investigated
several of the key cases, submitting taped interviews and investigation
reports. Our thanks for these chronologies must go to our documentation team:
William Wise (Project Blue Book Archive), Dan Wilson (archive researcher), and
Brad Sparks (Comprehensive Catalog of Project Blue Book Unknowns). Last, but
not least, our thanks to Jean Waskiewicz who created the online NICAP DBase
(NSID) that helped make it possible to link from the cases to the reports
themselves.
NICAP Site Coordinator”
Related posts:
(lib.utexas.edu image)
U.S. Government UFO Document:
“PROJECT 10073 RECORD (CARD):
DATE - TIME GROUP: 17 May 67/
LOCATION: Rural Hall, North Carolina”
(Project Blue Book , U.S. Air Force, Washington , D.C. )
Source: Fold3.com, Lindon , Utah
Quote from the document:
“(2 Witnesses)
Object was round, similar to a small aircraft. Bright
orange in color. Object was passing back and forth over a jet aircraft that was
heading NE. Aircraft flew in a straight pattern, but the object flew in a
zig-zag pattern.”
Project Blue Book listed
the case as “UNIDENTIFIED.”
Wikipedia article: “Rural Hall , North Carolina ”:
(tageo.com photo)
UFO Case Directory (ANRECAT):
“Rotating Object & Animal Reaction
Feb. 15, 1963
Willow Grove, Australia”
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Keith Basterfield:
February
15, 1963; Willow Grove, Australia
7:10 hrs local time. Farmer Charles Brew and his son
Trevor were in a milking shed, milking a herd of cows. Charles saw an object
descend very steeply out of the east out of low cloud, at about a forty-five
degree angle. The object was described as about 25 feet in diameter, and
about 9-10 feet
high. The lower portion, about three feet high, was rotating in an
anti-clockwise direction, and was of a bluish appearance. The upper portion of
the object appeared to be stationary; battleship grey in colour, with a
transparent dome on top. Protruding out of this dome was something which
resembled a broom handle. A sound, described as a ‘swishing’ or ‘burbling’ was
heard by Charles and also by Trevor. Trevor did not see the object due to his
position in the milking shed. The weather at the time was described as low
cloud, with rain. Visibility was poor with no thunder or lightning. The wind
Charles said, was from the east. The object travelled across the sky, and using
a tree for a reference, Charles estimated the object came as close as 75 feet . When due north of
him, it hovered over a tree for a few seconds, and then took off to the W at a
very fast speed, at an estimated 45 degree angle and lost in the low cloud. The
total duration was 15-16 seconds. Cows, and a nearby horse, reacted by running
away from the shed area. Charles reported he had a headache (an unusual
occurrence for him) following the event, which lasted a day. He also reported a
slight drop in milk production from the herd, over the week following the
incident. (Sources: (1) RAAF file series A703, control symbol 580-1-1 part 4,
pp373-390. This has detailed interview notes; sketches and map. (2) Transcript
of interview between the Brews and the Victorian UFO Research Society. 1963.
(3) Interview between the Brews and J E McDonald in 1967. (4) A series of blog
posts by Keith Basterfield, bringing all the available Moe material into one
place).”
Wikipedia article: “Willow Grove , Victoria ”:
Related posts:
(tageo.com photo)
UFO Case Report (E-mail):
“Subject: Merced CA, April 4, 1949”
By Joan Woodward, Animal Reaction Specialist, 3
December 2005
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Animal Reaction Feature:
At 10:20 PM, the witness and his dog went outdoors. The
witness heard an intense clicking sound coming from the sky and saw a dark
object as it moved against the background of stars. The witness described his
dog’s reaction as follows: ‘My dog was with me and directed her attention in
the general direction of this object’s flight throughout its course. She had
been romping with me on coming out of the house but without spoken word [she]
stopped and directed her attention to the previously described area [dark
object flight path].’
The sighting:
This sighting is listed as a Blue Book unknown.
Weather: Castle
AFB weather station
reported thin/broken clouds at 20,000 feet , 12 mile visibility and
surface winds as north at 9
mph . The witness reported his area (1 mile west of Merced and 7
miles south of Castle AFB )
was more sheltered and had no appreciable surface wind.
The witness is a Major in the Active USAF Reserves. He
is a pilot, with 2200 hours flight time, including night flying in WWII. He reported the sighting to the Intelligence
Officer at Castle Field.
Duration of sighting: 35-45 seconds (including sound
and visual)
The witness came outdoors with his dog and heard a ‘clicking
noise of considerable intensity.’ He stopped, locating the sound as coming from
the sky about 40 degrees from eastern horizon.
He observed a dark shape moving against the background of stars in a
flight path to the West or NW.
He described the object as a solid mass whose size he
estimated as 4-5 feet
in diameter and whose altitude he estimated as considerably less than 1,000 feet . On two occasions the reflection of
streetlights, located ½ block behind the witness, made the object appear to
have a dull-surface and one of light colored metal. Also, the reflection of the
streetlights off the surface of the object made the witness think that the
under-surface was curved. No exhaust trail was seen. No lights or flame
observed. No whistle or roar, only a clicking sound that maintained the same
pitch and speed, but altered in loudness (see below). The clicking sound was
compared to the beaters of a home mixer that were not properly meshed.
The dark object moved slowly going the West or NW,
made a 90-degree-arc turn to the South or SW. The clicking sound became louder
on the new heading. The clicking sound stopped when it was the loudest
(seemingly overhead relative to the witness) and the witness was unable to
detect the object after the sound ceased.
No EM effects or physiological effects were reported.
Source:
Memorandum to Director, FBI, from SAC, Los Angeles , dated May
13, 1949. Copy of the memorandum came
from MUFON Files with thanks to John Schuessler. Memo copied below:”
Related posts:
(tageo.com
photo)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

_Adm._Gary_Roughead.jpg)

