Showing posts sorted by relevance for query RAND. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query RAND. Sort by date Show all posts

Friday, 1 July 2011

UFO Paper:
“UFOs: What to Do?”, 27 November 1968

(RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California) 
(NICAP.org)

This UFO paper, written by George Kocher, was originally produced as an internal document, and not prepared for or delivered to any of RAND's clients, according to the RAND Corporation:

http://www.nicap.org/docs/rand/randdoc681127.pdf

http://www.nicap.org/papers/randdoc.htm

RAND eventually decided to make this paper available to the public.

RAND Corporation (Research ANd Development) is a non-profit global policy think tank first formed to offer research and analysis to the United States Armed Forces by the Douglas Aircraft Company, according to the Wikipedia article, “RAND Corporation”:








RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (wikipedia.org)
(wikipedia.org photo)

Friday, 21 October 2011

UFO Articles:
“The RAND Corporation and UFOs – Parts 1 & 2”,
by J. Antonio Huneeus (OpenMinds.tv, Tempe, Arizona)


Part 1, 26 September 2011:

http://www.openminds.tv/the-rand-corporation-and-ufos-p1/

Part 2, 28 September 2011:

http://www.openminds.tv/rand-corporation-and-ufos-pt-2/

RAND Corporation (Research ANd Development) is a non-profit global policy think tank first formed to offer research and analysis to the United States Armed Forces by the Douglas Aircraft Company. It is currently financed by the U.S. government and private endowment, corporations, including the healthcare industry, universities and private individuals, according to the Wikipedia article, “RAND Corporation”:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAND_Corporation

Related post:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/2011/07/ufo-paper-ufos-what-to-do-by-george.html









RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (wikipedia.org)
(wikipedia.org photo)

Wednesday, 31 July 2019

UFO Paper Excerpt:
UFO Case Report


Paper: “UFOs: What to Do?”
By George Kocher, 27 November 1968
(RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California)

Source: NICAP.org

Quote from the UFO paper:
“To illustrate the character of reports, I will quote several narratives from the literature. (Narratives, of course, are just the beginning of any report. Quantitative information, usually not given in the narrative must be obtained by careful interview of the witness.) The first is taken from a collection of 160 reports by Olsen. (19) It was originally made to NICAP.

Date: 24 April 1962
Place: Springfield (Delaware County), Pennsylvania

First witness, J. A. Gasslein, Jr. (Lt. Colonel, USAR Ret.) reports: ‘Time: Approximately 1945 hours, weather: clear, cloudless, medium blue sky, visibility good.

‘My wife was driving her mother home following the latter’s visit to our home. They had driven around the block to higher ground when my wife’s mother looked out the car window and saw a large object. It was moving slowly and silently in an east-to-west direction at not over 50 ft. above street level. (Determined by the proximity to and relationship to the size of the Cape-Cod-type bungalows over which the object was passing.) My wife then plainly saw the object herself.

‘Anxious to have me see the object, my wife quickly drove the car back to our house and attracted my attention. I had been working in the basement. I ran out of the house and up the street for a view. By the time I saw it, the object appeared to be about a quarter to a half-mile away, moving in a westerly direction. I saw it as an object smaller at the top than at the base, seemingly suspended in the air at an angle of about 45 degrees from my position, and giving off colored lights. I know that the object was not any kind of conventional aircraft of balloon.

‘Having had the advantage of a closer viewing than I, my wife describes the object as follows..

‘ ‘The UFO appeared to be about the size of one of the Cape Cod houses over which it passed, which would make it approximately 30 ft. in diameter and about the same dimension in height. It was circular, surmounted by a dome giving off flashes of green light. The center section rotated a series of square shaped ‘windows,’ each giving off a brilliant white light. The base section was somewhat saucer-shaped, curved upward. Shafts of white light were directed downward from the base.’ Unfortunately, my wife cannot recall if the exterior was metallic in appearance. In any event, the object had a well-defined outline. Again, it moved silently. There was no evidence of occupants of the UFO.

‘Approximately 20 to 25 minutes following the first sighting described above, the following sighting occurred:

‘Returning from taking her mother home, my wife drove the car into our driveway alongside the house, headed westward. In the rear of our home was a wooded park area. My wife walked down the driveway to enter the house. Coming up the driveway was a neighbor friend, a young lady 20 years of age. In a tone of astonishment, she called my wife’s attention to the park area, from which was emerging an object of the same description as outlined above moving easterly at low level -- not over 50 ft. above ground level, as judged by the trees in the area -- the UFO proceeded relatively slowly and without sound. It was approaching the rear of our home and adjacent properties.

‘Again, my wife called me from the basement. By the time I got outside, the object had made a 90 degree turn northward and was proceeding parallel to the backs of the houses in the same line as ours. It was perhaps 150 - 200 yards distant. My observation of the characteristics of the UFO tallied with my wife's and the young lady’s. Each of them independently made a pencil sketch within a few minutes after the sighting, and the sketches were substantially alike. ‘All told, there were at least 15 persons in the vicinity who acknowledged seeing the object at about the same time as the sightings made by my wife and myself.’

Another witness, P. T. Scattergood, reports: ‘Around 8 (p.m.) I stepped out the front door, facing south and saw a brilliantly lighted object low in the southern sky. At first I took it to be a jet taking off from Philadelphia Airport, which is in that general direction. But I could hear no engine noise and it was traveling too slowly to be a plane. Also it did not have the usual blinking lights.

‘It appeared to have a row of yellowish lights (which I took for the windows of the ‘jet’) with a clear green light at the top. As I watched, the row of lights appeared to be obscured as though a large paddle-wheel were revolving and blotting them out, beginning with the rear lights and proceeding forward. Since the object was moving west, I saw the right hand side of it. The periodic appearance and disappearance of the lights was perfectly regular. The top green light was constantly visible. I stood on the pavement and watched the object sail leisurely to the west until it disappeared behind some trees. The observation probably lasted from 5 to 10 minutes.’

This report has the desirable features of the UFO being seen by a number of people (about 15) of which two actually made reports. (Hynek estimates the number of sightings to be about 10 times the number of reports turned in). Other desirable aspects of this sighting are that it was made during daylight; that it was near enough that some details of its configuration were observable; and, it was visible long enough to allow the observers to consider ‘explanations’ as they watched it.”


Related posts:



realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=1962
















Satellite photo of Springfield, Pennsylvania (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

Thursday, 21 February 2019

UFO Report:
“The 1968 UFO Chronology”


Created: 15 November 2006
Updated: 5 January 2017
(NICAP.org)

Quote from the UFO report:
“This is a  twelve-page chronology of UFO incidents and events for 1968. Our thanks for these chronologies must go to our documentation team: Richard Hall (the original 1968 chronology from UFOE II), William Wise (Project Blue Book Archive), Dan Wilson (archive researcher), and Brad Sparks (Comprehensive Catalog of Project Blue Book Unknowns). Last, but not least, our thanks to Jean Waskiewicz who created the online NICAP DBase (NSID) that helped make it possible to link from the cases to the reports themselves.

Earlier last year, on September 18, 1967, Condon, Low and Saunders had met for the first time in many weeks. As a result of his reading of the memo, Saunders was deeply concerned about the negative approach to the UFO problem. Saunders was led to believe that if by chance the Extra Terrestrial Intelligence (ETI) hypothesis was substantiated, the announcement would be sent by Condon directly to the Air Force and the President, and never be allowed to go to the public. This troubled him, because Saunders had been given a clear understanding that the report would go first to the National Academy of Sciences, then to the public and Air Force simultaneously. Saunders felt he could not let the problem drop. Another meeting was agreed to. At this point, Keyhoe suddenly sent word that NICAP was going to take a strong stand against the Condon committee and no longer would supply material and reports. The reason, Keyhoe said, was a new speech made by Condon at the Atomic Spectroscopy Symposium at Gaithersburg, Md., on September 13, 1967. A report of the new Condon speech had already reached Dr. McDonald in a letter from a colleague at the University of Arizona, William S. Bickel, assistant professor of physics on the campus. The rest was all down hill, but the Condon Report later tried to say they couldn’t get cooperation, as excerpts inserted in the chronology will demonstrate.

As the Colorado UFO Project prepares to announce the failure to find anything of substance to UFOs and the need to close the Air Force Project Blue Book, other studies, such as the secret NSA document below, and later the RAND document (Nov. 27), give a more accurate report.

Francis Ridge
NICAP Site Coordinator

Sept. 17, 1968; Nellis AFB, NV (BBU)
1 a.m. 2 air traffic controllers including supervisor saw nocturnal light. (Hynek UFO Exp ch. 5, case NL-3)”


Wikipedia article: “Nellis Air Force Base”:


Related posts:


realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=1968









Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada (wikimedia.org)
(wikimedia.org photo)

Saturday, 30 March 2013

UFO Video Report:
“Your Need to Know – The RAND Corporation and UFOs”,
28 March 2013
(OpenMinds.tv, Tempe, Arizona)

The video report is presented by J. Antonio Huneeus:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daAcBu9xBi4











(OpenMinds.tv image)

Friday, 13 December 2013

UFO Publications:
“UFO Studies, Research Papers and Books”


(NOUFORS, Sudbury, Canada)

Northern Ontario UFO Research & Study presents the following UFO reports, research papers and books:

* “PROJECT BLUE BOOK  SPECIAL REPORT NO.14, May 5, 1955”

* “ELECTRO-MAGNETIC EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS by Washington, D.C., Subcommittee of the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP), June 1960”

* “THE UFO EVIDENCE, 1964 (book by NICAP)”

* “ADVANCED VEHICLE CONCEPTS RESEARCH, May 2, 1968”

* “UNITED STATES AIR FORCE PROJECTS GRUDGE and BLUEBOOK REPORTS 1-12, June 1968”

Dr. James E. McDonald publications:
* “STATEMENT ON UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS, 
July 29, 1968

* UFOs  An International Scientific Problem

* UFOs  Extraterrestrial Probes?

* UFO ENCOUNTER 1

* Science in Default

* UFOs and the Condon Report

* THE PROBLEM OF THE UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS

* UFOs OVER LAKENHEATH IN 1956

* THE 1957 GULF COAST RB-47 INCIDENT

* THE KIRTLAND AIRFIELD UFO

* UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS: GREATEST SCIENTIFIC PROBLEM OF OUR TIMES?

* Science, Technology, and UFOs

* Letter to the United Nations Outer Space Affairs Group Meteorological Factors in Unidentified Radar Returns”

* “RAND Document, November 27, 1968”

* “UFOLOGY, 1976 (book by James M. McCampbell”

* “THE UFO ENIGMA, 1983”:

http://www.noufors.com/UFO_studies_research_papers_&_books.html

(noufors.com image)