Showing posts sorted by relevance for query May 1968. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query May 1968. Sort by date Show all posts
Saturday, 19 January 2019
UFO News Article (Blog):
“USOs — the new frontier”
By Billy Cox, 14 January 2019
(De Void, Sarasota Herald-Tribune , Florida )
Among other comments, Billy Cox reports on four U.S.
Navy unidentified submerged object incidents (USS Zellers, May 1968; USS
Monrovia, 23 May 1968; USS Forrestal, July 1974; USS Nimitz, 14 November 2004)
and presents an interview with Robert Powell of the Scientific Coalition for
Ufology (SCU).
Related posts:
Robert Powell ,
U.S. UFO
Researcher
(podcastufo.com photo)
Saturday, 25 July 2020
UFO Journal Article:
“French General, Scientists, Report UFOs”
U.F.O. Investigator, May-June 1968, Vol. IV, No. 6
(National Investigations Committee on Aerial
Phenomena, Washington , D.C. )
Source: J. Allen
Hynek Center
for UFO Studies (CUFOS.org),
The whole article (Page 3):
“In recent months, close approaches have dominated
reports of UFOs, but several other cases by specially qualified observers also
have added important evidence.
On the night of April 12 [1968], two UFOs were
observed in the Washington, D.C., area by two men, one a zoologist, the other
an astronomer. In a signed report to NICAP, the first witness described the
objects as dull orange globes. They appeared at 11:40 p.m., he said, and moved
swiftly across the sky, SSE to NNW, disappearing in about five seconds.
An earlier report, recently received, confirmed an
encounter by General Paul Stehlin, a top-level pilot in the French Air Force.
On an afternoon in September, 1967, General Stehlin was piloting a plane over
Villacoublay, a military airfield near Paris ,
when he saw a silvery cigar-shaped object flying parallel to his aircraft. The
UFO paced the general’s plane for several minutes, then accelerated and rapidly
went out of sight.
Several 1968 reports describe EM (electromagnetic)
interference effects from nearby UFOs. One case occurred on Jan. 2 [1968], in Whitehorse , Yukon ,
Canada . About 4
p.m. Tom Banks and Errol Smyth were cruising in their snowmobiles when they
spotted a pulsating orange-yellow UFO just over the treetops. Its radiance,
they said, was brighter than the sun. Banks reported that his snowmobile
stopped and he felt an unusual heat–both effects supposedly from the UFO. The
strange object quickly disappeared, after which the snowmobile functioned
normally.
TV INTERFERENCE
Shortly before midnight on Jan. 8 [1968], according to
the Trenton Times, an orange-red, bowl-shaped object was sighted at Jackson, N.
J. The witnesses were Mr. and Mrs. Robert LeChance and a neighbour, Mrs.
Gertrude Gifford.
Just prior to spotting the object, LeChance said, the
colors in his TV picture faded out. Mrs Gifford reported that her TV set ‘went
out completely, and my lights dimmed. . . .It (the UFO) went down behind the
tree line, then came up and went down again…until it finally disappeared.’ She
told police she was badly scared by the incident.
An unusual wind effect was reported on Jan. 30 [1968] by
a number of Venezuelans. The sighting was described by witnesses on the Punto
Solo ranch in the Palo Seco area. A spokesman for the group, ranch-owner
Prudencio Salzar, said a silvery object emitting red lights landed near a
corral. As it took off, he said, it made a sound ‘and the trees around the site
were shaken violently by blasts of wind.’
CLOSE APPROACH IN CANADA
A disturbing UFO sound was also linked with a sighting
on Feb. 19 [1968], near Bengough ,
Saskatchewan , Canada .
The witness, Mrs. Martha Heggs, said the sound was a high-pitched whining noise
which caused ‘a tingling sensation throughout her body,’ according to a report
submitted by NICAP member D. F. Clausen.
Looking out her window, Mrs. Heggs saw a clearly
outlined UFO. Its lower portion, she said, was like ‘two shallow plates placed
lip to lip.’ It also had an ‘inverted bowl’ superstructure and a smaller, dome-like
structure on top of this. An aerial-like section supporting a small sphere
could be seen at the extreme top. Around the superstructure, Mrs. Heggs
reported, were six or seven arch-shaped ports, and she could see what looked
like riveted seams around the lower part.
The UFO was first seen circling ‘about one foot’ above
a 35-foot power pole mounting a transformer. It circled the pole to the left
four times, then moved out over the witness’ farmyard, descending to ‘three
feet off the ground’ and hovering for about five minutes, ‘dirctly in front of
three wrecked cars.’ It ascended to about 20 feet and circled four
storage bins. The object then moved northeast over three more bins and circled
two nearby tractors and continued onward seemingly to survey two parked trucks,
two elevated fuel storage tanks and an electric water pump. It then headed
toward some trees, leaving the farmyard.
Mrs. Heggs reported that, during the sighting, her
‘dog was cowering, lying on the snow and trying to cover its ears with its
front feet.’ Her cattle also reportedly ‘took flight when she first saw the
object...,’ running into their sheds. They did not emerge until after the UFO
had left the area.
Five nights later [24 February 1968], another UFO
encounter took place near Westhill ,
Pa. The details were given to
NICAP in a signed report by Mr. Karl E. Will, a chemical engineer.
Mr. and Mrs. Will had just left Westhill for their
home in Carlisle , Pa. , when they spotted a brilliant object
approaching from the west.
‘It was somewhat oval in shape, with a foreshortened
tail end,’ Mr. Will reported. ‘The rear of the object had a fin or antenna
tipped with a red light. The underside. . .sported two red lights, one on
either side and somewhat forward to the center.’
As a jet aircraft flew in the vicinity of the UFO, he
added, the object’s red lights ‘seemed to dim near to extinction’ but
brightened after the plane left the area.
‘In the meantime,’ Will continued, ‘I had removed the
spotlight from the trunk of my auto and tried to signal the object by blinking
the light. As soon as I did, the lights went out. I sighted the object no
more.’
PHYSICAL-EFFECT REPORT
Possible physiological effects from UFOs have been
reported in increasing number. One example is described in a signed NICAP
report by Nicholas Sgouris of Syracuse ,
N. Y.
At 6:15 p.m. on March 4 [1968], Sgouris was driving
outside of Syracuse
when he saw a solid object ‘with flashing multicoloured lights’ which were
steadily blinking. Its altitude was about 200 feet .
‘My car started running funny,’ the witness reported.
‘I looked out the left window and saw an object approaching from the left. It
passed over (the) highway in front of me….’
Sgouris said his car slowed almost to a stop after he
had sighted the object and that he experienced a ‘funny feeling’ and couldn’t
move until the UFO headed away.
Another Syracuse
sighting was reported on March 8 by three citizens. The UFO at first appeared
to be ball-shaped, but as it changed position it was seen to be a large disc
with a domed top.
Other logged reports, with few details: March 27 [1968],
77 miles
east of Anchorage, Alaska, a large, silvery, rectangular object seen by 11
witnesses; April 8 [1968], Toronto, Canada, a hovering object with a ring of
orange-red lights and three white beams which lit up the area; April 12 [1968],
Cape Neddick, Maine, and oval domed object with a cluster of red blinking
lights and a pulsating white light in front.
SUBMERGING UFO CASE
Since publishing ‘The Question of Submerging UFOs,’
(Vol. IV, No. 5 ) we have received other reports of objects on or near bodies
of water. One case is described by Barry A. Nason , New Brunswick , Canada . Nason was fishing in Trout Brook
Lake when a small UFO,
estimated three feet in diameter, hit the water about 15 yards away.
‘It was traveling in a spinning fashion,’ Nason said.
‘It sprayed water seven or eight feet high. . . and made a terrible, loud
sound.’ Nason crouched, fearing the UFO might come his way. The object then
left the water and went into a clump of bushes, making ‘an awful commotion.’ It
then flew back over the lake and submerged at one edge. Nason said he saw a big
cloud of steam and heard a gurgling sound. For some time afterward, he stated,
the water was covered with small waves.
A second 1967 Canadian case, investigated by NICAP
member D. F. Clausen, involved a close approach to a school bus. The report was
made by Mrs. Evelyn Brown, the driver. On June 1, 1967, Mrs. Brown was headed
toward Shauvavon , Saskatchewan , when she glimpsed a strange
object over her left shoulder. She stopped the bus and the UFO also stopped,
hovering for several seconds. It was a round device, with a ‘dull aluminum’
appearance. Above the main body she said, was a superstructure with portholes
and atop this was a ‘glass-like’ dome.
After 15 seconds, the UFO lifted, passed over the bus,
then hovered again, to the right of the vehicle, finally moving to a position
‘dead ahead.’
‘At this moment Mrs. Brown turned on the headlights,’ Mr. Clausen reports. ‘The object stopped immediately. She then switched the headlights off and on three or four times. The ‘object’ rocked three or four times. . . stopped rocking, hovered for about two seconds, then rose very fast, straight up out of sight.’ ”
Wikipedia article: “Vélizy – Villacoublay Air Base”:
Quote from the Wikipedia article:
“Vélizy – Villacoublay Air Base (French: Base
aérienne 107 Vélizy-Villacoublay) (ICAO: LFPV) is a French Air Force
(French: Armée de l'Air (ALA )
base. The base is located approximately 2 miles (3.2 km ) southeast of Vélizy-Villacoublay; about
8 miles (13 km )
southwest of Paris.”
Vélizy-Villacoublay Air Base, near
(Photo: Google)
(Photo:
tageo.com)
Wednesday, 19 April 2017
UFO Case Directory (IMCAT):
“Category 08, Photographic / Video Images
Edwards AFB Case
May 2, 1957
Edwards AFB, California”
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Brad Sparks:
“Brad Sparks:
May 2, 1957. Edwards AFB, Calif. (BBU 4715)
6:55-7:20 a.m. (PDT). James D. Bittick and John R.
Gettys, Jr., civilian phototheodolite operators, were driving by truck to
Askania Site #4 when they sighted an object above them about 500 yards away. They
radioed a report to their supervisor Frank Baker who told them to set up the
camera and try to film the object, which they did after about 10 mins. They photographed what they described as a
golden luminous domed-saucer shaped object with holes or ports around the dome
about 100 ft
in diameter about 1 mile
in the distance to the N headed E (photos show multiple? objects). (My
emphasis) Available phototheodolite frames 614, 620 and 651 (609 too blurred,
cutoff) show azimuth 10°28' elevation 2°24' shifting E to azimuth 40°30'
elevation 1°0'. Disappeared at about 5 miles . Possible jet fighter interception. [Possible weather balloon with slow leak,
explanation denied by Edwards AFB Colonel Klein (sp?) analyzing actual tracking
of balloon and wind direction.] (My emphasis) (Tom Tulien; Jan Aldrich;
McDonald 1968 pp. 75, 85; Loren Gross Mar-May 1957 pp. 67-68; IUR Oct 2005) 25
mins 2 witnesses 8 Full Moons? photo-theodolite
Fran Ridge:
This is McDonald case #41 and BB case # 4715. The
implications of what Cooper has said on camera is very interesting, if true
(See YouTubes below). In 1957, when Cooper was 30 and a captain, he was
assigned to Fighter Section of the Experimental Flight Test Engineering
Division at Edwards Air Force Base in California .
He acted as a test pilot and project manager. But nowhere in the documentation
below is Cooper mentioned, so therefore we must assume this was another
case. (Cooper’s report).
Mike Swords:
The issue is that Max Miller wrote [at the time] that
the case occurred on May 3rd. Later one of the witnesses told McDonald that it
occurred on May 3rd. [even drew him a picture of the UFO with the May 3rd date
labeling it]. Then McDonald, who had correspondence wherein he said ‘May 3rd,’ went to the Project Blue Book files and said
that the official documents there said May 2nd. *”
NICAP.org presents U.S. government (U.S. Air Force) documents that pertain to the UFO case.
The case directory contains four U.S. Air Force UFO
photos.
(nicap.org photo) (courtesy of Jan Aldrich)
Aerial view of Edwards Air Force Base, Edwards, California
(wikimedia.org)
(wikimedia.org photo)
Sunday, 23 April 2017
UFO News Article:
“Farmer sees UFO 1968 Ohio”
(not the article’s headline)
7 May 1968
(Prince
George Citizen ,
Canada )
Source: ufonewspaper.blogspot.com
The whole article:
“A herd of cows in the south Ohio
(South Ohio, Nova Scotia , Canada ) farming area near Yarmouth led to one of the strangest
sightings.
Chasing several strays that had wandered away, a
farmer and his neighbor were suddenly confronted with a bright, stationary
object about 1,000 feet
from the ground. They later described the glow ‘like a flood-light’ coming
straight down from the strange craft. The two men watched as the object moved
away and the light disappeared.”
Wikipedia article: “South Ohio, Nova Scotia ”:
Satellite photo of Yarmouth , Canada
(tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)
Friday, 13 December 2013
UFO Publications:
“UFO Studies, Research Papers and Books”
(NOUFORS, Sudbury, Canada)
Northern Ontario UFO Research
& Study presents the following UFO reports, research papers and books:
* “PROJECT BLUE BOOK – SPECIAL
REPORT NO.14, May 5, 1955”
* “ELECTRO-MAGNETIC EFFECTS
ASSOCIATED WITH UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS by Washington, D.C., Subcommittee
of the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP), June 1960”
* “THE UFO EVIDENCE, 1964 (book
by NICAP)”
* “ADVANCED VEHICLE CONCEPTS
RESEARCH, May 2, 1968”
* “UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
PROJECTS GRUDGE and BLUEBOOK REPORTS 1-12, June 1968”
Dr. James E. McDonald publications:
* “STATEMENT ON UNIDENTIFIED
FLYING OBJECTS,
July 29,1968
July 29,
* UFOs – An International
Scientific Problem
* UFOs – Extraterrestrial
Probes?
* UFO ENCOUNTER 1
* Science in Default
* UFOs and the Condon Report
* THE PROBLEM OF THE
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS
* UFOs OVER LAKENHEATH IN 1956
* THE 1957 GULF COAST RB-47
INCIDENT
* THE KIRTLAND AIRFIELD UFO
* UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS:
GREATEST SCIENTIFIC PROBLEM OF OUR TIMES?
* Science, Technology, and UFOs
* Letter to the United Nations
Outer Space Affairs Group Meteorological Factors in Unidentified Radar Returns”
* “RAND Document, November 27, 1968”
* “UFOLOGY, 1976 (book by James
M. McCampbell”
* “THE UFO ENIGMA, 1983”:
(noufors.com image)
Wednesday, 13 May 2020
UFO News Article:
“Here Are The Navy Pilot Reports From Encounters With Mysterious Aircraft
Off The East Coast”
By Tyler Rogoway and Joseph Trevithick, 12 May 2020
(The Drive, U.S.A. )
The article’s sub-headline reads, “The reports are the first official
documentation of various recent incidents with unidentified aircraft in
restricted airspace along the east coast.”
The War Zone obtained eight U.S. Navy “Unclassified” and “For Official Use Only”
hazard reports, according to the article.
The documents were released after The
War Zone placed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the Naval Safety
Center .
F/A-18E/F Super Hornets were involved in the UFO incidents (seven hazard
reports) that occurred between 2013 and 2014 in the W-72 warning area off the coast of Virginia and North
Carolina .
The eight hazard report describes UFO incidents involving an
The eight hazard report describes UFO incidents involving an
EA-18G Growler airplane that occurred in 2019 in the W-386
warning area (off the coast of Maryland )
(see the below link,
“vfrmap.com”).
A big kudos to The War Zone
for getting these official U.S.
government documents released.
Wikipedia article: “
Quote from the above Wikipedia article:
“The Naval Safety Center is a U.S. Navy organization.
In May 1968, the Naval Aviation Safety Center and the Submarine Safety
Center, located in New London, Connecticut, merged to become the Naval Safety
Center (NSC).[1] Programs involving surface ships and shore activities were
added to form the nucleus for all safety programs within the Navy. In 1986,
system safety was added as a program, and the position of a Marine Corps deputy
commander was established to administer and represent Marine Corps safety
issues.
Today, the Naval
Safety Center
is organized into four directorates: aviation, afloat, shore, and operational
risk management/expeditionary warfare. Six departments and five special staff
divisions provide support to the core operations of the command. The Naval
School of Aviation Safety in Pensacola ,
Florida , is also a NAVSAFECEN
detachment consisting of civilian and military staff, which includes Marine
Corps personnel. As an Echelon II command, NAVSAFECEN provides oversight of its
single Echelon III command, the Naval Safety and Environmental
Training Center
in Norfolk , Virginia .
One of the NSC's subsections is Navy Occupational Safety & Health (NAVOSH).
NAVOSH is responsible for safety practices within the Navy. NAVOSH provides safety
assistance and advice to the CNO, CMC, and the Deputy Assistant Secretary of
the Navy for Safety with the aim of enhancing the war-fighting capability of
the Navy and Marine Corps, preserve resources, and improve combat readiness by
preventing mishaps and saving lives.”
Wikipedia article: “Boeing EA-18G Growler”:
Wikipedia article: “Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet”:
Wikipedia article: “Visual flight rules” [VFR]:
Related posts:
A U.S. Navy EA-18G Growler assigned to the USS Carl Vinson breaks away from a U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker from the 909th Air Refueling Squadron after conducting in-air refueling May 3, 2017, over the Western Pacific Ocean. The 909th ARS is an essential component to the mid-air refueling of a multitude of aircraft ranging from fighter jets to cargo planes from different services and nations in the region. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman John Linzmeier) (text by Wikipedia)
(wikimedia.org photo)

Map of the North Carolina-Virginia-Maryland coast
(lib.utexas.edu image)
Monday, 15 August 2016
UFO News Article:
“Doubts Rise as to Objectivity
Of ‘Flying Saucer’ Project”
1 May 1968
(Nashua Telegraph, New Hampshire)
Quote from the article:
“A final report of the scientists’ findings will be
given to the National Academy of Sciences late in September. Condon, a
physicist, said he would not discuss any conclusions that the researches might
have reached.
Condon’s statement came amid controversy between him
and Look Magazine over an article that calls the project the ‘Flying Saucer
Fiasco.’
The university undertook a $500,000 study of
Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO’s) late in 1966 at the request of the Air
Force, whose critics accused it of failing for two decades to make a
comprehensive, scientific investigation of saucer reports from the public.
On the House floor Tuesday, Rep. J. Edward Roush,
D-Ind., using phrases from the Look article, said Congress should take over the
investigation from the Air Force. He said grave doubts had arisen ‘as to the
scientific profundity and objectivity of the Colorado project.’
Elsewhere, the non-governmental National
Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) held a news conference
here to announce that it had ‘broken with’ the Colorado project and to ‘reveal
the firing of top project scientists and other incidents leading to the project’s
failure.’
NICAP headquarters here has expressed strong
scepticism about the project for months.
The Look article, in the May 14 issue, indicates that
the two men who were dismissed and others on the staff felt that Condon and
others directing the project took a negative attitude toward the possibility
that flying saucers existed and were attempting to end up with a report
containg such a ‘negative’ conclusion.”
Wikipedia article: “Condon Committee”:
(wikimedia.org image)
Thursday, 8 September 2016
UFO Article (Blog):
“Finally, US Air Force Records Discovered
Confirming UFO Activity During The Striking
Of The HMAS Hobart – Part 2”
By Paul Dean, 18 August 2016
(UFOs – Documenting The Evidence, Melbourne,
Australia)
HMAS Hobart was attacked by a United States Air Force F–4
Phantom Fighter-Bomber on 17 June 1968.
Quote from the article:
“Of course, no serious research project falls back on
a single document. Anyone who knows my work will be well aware that I
ceaselessly bring forth more, and more, and more, unseen government UFO records
to the table. In this Part 2, I aim to present new, or barely known, records
which relate to the HMAS Hobart incident. Moreover, there may be,
unsurprisingly, a great deal more still–classified records relating to the
incident that we simply do not have access to.
An important question which must be asked is that of
terminology. Is the use of the term ‘UFO,’ when used in Vietnam–era military
records, merely a ‘catchall’ for anything which is airborne and simply unknown
to the observer? It would be easy to assume such is the case. However, time and
time again we see the term ‘UFO,’ or ‘Unidentified Flying Object’ as distinctly referenced alongside terms
like ‘unidentified aircraft,’ ‘unknown aircraft’ and the like.
Another (USMC) ‘Command Chronology’ publication makes
reference to ongoing UFO activity in the precise vicinity of where HMAS Hobart
was patrolling, and only two nights beforehand. Titled ‘III Marine Amphibious Force, Air Ground Team, Command Chronology,
June 1968,’
it was printed by Headquarters, III Marine Amphibious Force, Military
Assistance Command on the 9th of August, 1968. Originally classified ‘SECRET,’
and only downgraded to ‘UNCLASSIFIED’ in 2014, it is held, among thousands of
similar publications, at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA) in Washington DC. In a chapter titled ‘Intelligence,’ there is this
curious statement on Page 17:
‘During
the late evening hours of 15 June approximately 15 unidentified aircraft,
believed to be enemy helicopters, were reportedly sighted in the DMZ area. Since that time there have been numerous
sightings, both visual and by radar, of unidentified, slow–moving UFO’s in the
DMZ area and seaward toward Tiger Island.
No hard evidence of these aircraft has yet been received.’
So, even this USMC historical record – which was
authored by utilising raw and classified records – states that ‘unidentified
aircraft’ on the 15th of June were only ‘believed’ to be enemy helicopters.
Beyond that, ‘numerous sightings’ – seen both visually and on radar – of ‘unidentified,
slow–moving UFO’s’ around Tiger Island obviously were of concern. The
date–range of these sightings, of course, lead right up to the accidental
missile strike on HMAS Hobart.”
http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com/2016/08/finally-us-air-force-records-discovered_18.html
http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com/2016/08/finally-us-air-force-records-discovered_18.html
HMAS Hobart attack map (project1947.com)
(project1947.com image)
Wednesday, 21 June 2017
UFO News Article:
“Book tells about Air Force & UFO incidents”
16 June 2017
(Minot Daily News, North Dakota )
The article reports on Captain David D. Schindele’s
new UFO book, It Never Happened, Volume 1.
Scindele’s tour of duty at Minot Air Force Base lasted
from July 1965 to May 1968, according to the article.
Wikipedia article: “Minot Air Force Base”:
Aerial view of Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota
(wikimedia.org photo)
Monday, 30 May 2016
UFO Article (Blog):
“NORAD And The UFO Smokescreen – Part 8”
By Paul Dean, 27 May 2016
(UFOs – Documenting The Evidence, Melbourne, Australia)
The article reports on the FOIA research work of
Robert Todd (U.S.A.) and Dr. Henry Azadehdel (UK).
Quote from the article:
“In Part 6 and Part 7 of my ‘NORAD and the UFO
Smokescreen’ series, I discussed the possibility that the North American
Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD), as well as other commands and their space
components, may have detected and tracked UFO’s outside Earth’s atmosphere. As
I have stated before, I use the term ‘UFO’ to describe unknown and
unidentifiable bodies which are above-and-beyond natural and manmade objects. I
discussed NORAD’s early efforts, starting in the 1950’s, through to the 1990’s
and 2000’s, where the US Space Command (SPACECOM), and then the US Strategic
Command (STRATCOM) partially took over space surveillance from NORAD. Possibly
the most important issue I discussed was the detection and tracking of unknown
bodies in space, usually termed ‘Uncorrelated Targets’ (UCTs), plus the
declassified military doctrine that tasks the Space Surveillance Network (SSN)
with evaluating them.
In this entry in the series, I look at the efforts of
UFO researchers, from the 1970’s to the 1990’s, to obtain actual UCT data from
NORAD, as well as the space component commands of the United States Navy (USN)
and United States Air Force (USAF). It should be noted, that UFO researchers
were not aware of the term ‘Uncorrelated Target’ (UCT) until 1994, yet had been
in use within the US military since at least 1968. Even without using the exact
jargon, some significant information was released.”
http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com/2016/05/norad-and-ufo-smokescreen-part-8-in.html
http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com/2016/05/norad-and-ufo-smokescreen-part-8-in.html
(wikimedia.org image)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

.jpg)

