Showing posts sorted by relevance for query April 1968. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query April 1968. Sort by date Show all posts

Saturday, 25 July 2020

UFO Journal Article:
“French General, Scientists, Report UFOs”


U.F.O. Investigator, May-June 1968, Vol. IV, No. 6
(National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena, Washington, D.C.)

Source: J. Allen Hynek Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS.org),
Chicago, Illinois

The whole article (Page 3):
“In recent months, close approaches have dominated reports of UFOs, but several other cases by specially qualified observers also have added important evidence.

On the night of April 12 [1968], two UFOs were observed in the Washington, D.C., area by two men, one a zoologist, the other an astronomer. In a signed report to NICAP, the first witness described the objects as dull orange globes. They appeared at 11:40 p.m., he said, and moved swiftly across the sky, SSE to NNW, disappearing in about five seconds.

An earlier report, recently received, confirmed an encounter by General Paul Stehlin, a top-level pilot in the French Air Force. On an afternoon in September, 1967, General Stehlin was piloting a plane over Villacoublay, a military airfield near Paris, when he saw a silvery cigar-shaped object flying parallel to his aircraft. The UFO paced the general’s plane for several minutes, then accelerated and rapidly went out of sight.

Several 1968 reports describe EM (electromagnetic) interference effects from nearby UFOs. One case occurred on Jan. 2 [1968], in Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. About 4 p.m. Tom Banks and Errol Smyth were cruising in their snowmobiles when they spotted a pulsating orange-yellow UFO just over the treetops. Its radiance, they said, was brighter than the sun. Banks reported that his snowmobile stopped and he felt an unusual heat–both effects supposedly from the UFO. The strange object quickly disappeared, after which the snowmobile functioned normally.

TV INTERFERENCE

Shortly before midnight on Jan. 8 [1968], according to the Trenton Times, an orange-red, bowl-shaped object was sighted at Jackson, N. J. The witnesses were Mr. and Mrs. Robert LeChance and a neighbour, Mrs. Gertrude Gifford.

Just prior to spotting the object, LeChance said, the colors in his TV picture faded out. Mrs Gifford reported that her TV set ‘went out completely, and my lights dimmed. . . .It (the UFO) went down behind the tree line, then came up and went down again…until it finally disappeared.’ She told police she was badly scared by the incident.

An unusual wind effect was reported on Jan. 30 [1968] by a number of Venezuelans. The sighting was described by witnesses on the Punto Solo ranch in the Palo Seco area. A spokesman for the group, ranch-owner Prudencio Salzar, said a silvery object emitting red lights landed near a corral. As it took off, he said, it made a sound ‘and the trees around the site were shaken violently by blasts of wind.’

CLOSE APPROACH IN CANADA

A disturbing UFO sound was also linked with a sighting on Feb. 19 [1968], near Bengough, Saskatchewan, Canada. The witness, Mrs. Martha Heggs, said the sound was a high-pitched whining noise which caused ‘a tingling sensation throughout her body,’ according to a report submitted by NICAP member D. F. Clausen.

Looking out her window, Mrs. Heggs saw a clearly outlined UFO. Its lower portion, she said, was like ‘two shallow plates placed lip to lip.’ It also had an ‘inverted bowl’ superstructure and a smaller, dome-like structure on top of this. An aerial-like section supporting a small sphere could be seen at the extreme top. Around the superstructure, Mrs. Heggs reported, were six or seven arch-shaped ports, and she could see what looked like riveted seams around the lower part.

The UFO was first seen circling ‘about one foot’ above a 35-foot power pole mounting a transformer. It circled the pole to the left four times, then moved out over the witness’ farmyard, descending to ‘three feet off the ground’ and hovering for about five minutes, ‘dirctly in front of three wrecked cars.’ It ascended to about 20 feet and circled four storage bins. The object then moved northeast over three more bins and circled two nearby tractors and continued onward seemingly to survey two parked trucks, two elevated fuel storage tanks and an electric water pump. It then headed toward some trees, leaving the farmyard.

Mrs. Heggs reported that, during the sighting, her ‘dog was cowering, lying on the snow and trying to cover its ears with its front feet.’ Her cattle also reportedly ‘took flight when she first saw the object...,’ running into their sheds. They did not emerge until after the UFO had left the area.

Five nights later [24 February 1968], another UFO encounter took place near Westhill, Pa. The details were given to NICAP in a signed report by Mr. Karl E. Will, a chemical engineer.

Mr. and Mrs. Will had just left Westhill for their home in Carlisle, Pa., when they spotted a brilliant object approaching from the west.

‘It was somewhat oval in shape, with a foreshortened tail end,’ Mr. Will reported. ‘The rear of the object had a fin or antenna tipped with a red light. The underside. . .sported two red lights, one on either side and somewhat forward to the center.’

As a jet aircraft flew in the vicinity of the UFO, he added, the object’s red lights ‘seemed to dim near to extinction’ but brightened after the plane left the area.

‘In the meantime,’ Will continued, ‘I had removed the spotlight from the trunk of my auto and tried to signal the object by blinking the light. As soon as I did, the lights went out. I sighted the object no more.’

PHYSICAL-EFFECT REPORT

Possible physiological effects from UFOs have been reported in increasing number. One example is described in a signed NICAP report by Nicholas Sgouris of Syracuse, N. Y.

At 6:15 p.m. on March 4 [1968], Sgouris was driving outside of Syracuse when he saw a solid object ‘with flashing multicoloured lights’ which were steadily blinking. Its altitude was about 200 feet.

‘My car started running funny,’ the witness reported. ‘I looked out the left window and saw an object approaching from the left. It passed over (the) highway in front of me….’

Sgouris said his car slowed almost to a stop after he had sighted the object and that he experienced a ‘funny feeling’ and couldn’t move until the UFO headed away.

Another Syracuse sighting was reported on March 8 by three citizens. The UFO at first appeared to be ball-shaped, but as it changed position it was seen to be a large disc with a domed top.

Other logged reports, with few details: March 27 [1968], 77 miles east of Anchorage, Alaska, a large, silvery, rectangular object seen by 11 witnesses; April 8 [1968], Toronto, Canada, a hovering object with a ring of orange-red lights and three white beams which lit up the area; April 12 [1968], Cape Neddick, Maine, and oval domed object with a cluster of red blinking lights and a pulsating white light in front.

SUBMERGING UFO CASE

Since publishing ‘The Question of Submerging UFOs,’ (Vol. IV, No. 5 ) we have received other reports of objects on or near bodies of water. One case is described by Barry A. Nason, New Brunswick, Canada. Nason was fishing in Trout Brook Lake when a small UFO, estimated three feet in diameter, hit the water about 15 yards away.

‘It was traveling in a spinning fashion,’ Nason said. ‘It sprayed water seven or eight feet high. . . and made a terrible, loud sound.’ Nason crouched, fearing the UFO might come his way. The object then left the water and went into a clump of bushes, making ‘an awful commotion.’ It then flew back over the lake and submerged at one edge. Nason said he saw a big cloud of steam and heard a gurgling sound. For some time afterward, he stated, the water was covered with small waves.

A second 1967 Canadian case, investigated by NICAP member D. F. Clausen, involved a close approach to a school bus. The report was made by Mrs. Evelyn Brown, the driver. On June 1, 1967, Mrs. Brown was headed toward Shauvavon, Saskatchewan, when she glimpsed a strange object over her left shoulder. She stopped the bus and the UFO also stopped, hovering for several seconds. It was a round device, with a ‘dull aluminum’ appearance. Above the main body she said, was a superstructure with portholes and atop this was a ‘glass-like’ dome.

After 15 seconds, the UFO lifted, passed over the bus, then hovered again, to the right of the vehicle, finally moving to a position ‘dead ahead.’

‘At this moment Mrs. Brown turned on the headlights,’ Mr. Clausen reports. ‘The object stopped immediately. She then switched the headlights off and on three or four times. The ‘object’ rocked three or four times. . . stopped rocking, hovered for about two seconds, then rose very fast, straight up out of sight.’ ”


Wikipedia article: “Vélizy – Villacoublay Air Base”:


Quote from the Wikipedia article:
“Vélizy – Villacoublay Air Base (French: Base aérienne 107 Vélizy-Villacoublay) (ICAO: LFPV) is a French Air Force (French: Armée de l'Air (ALA) base. The base is located approximately 2 miles (3.2 km) southeast of Vélizy-Villacoublay; about 8 miles (13 km) southwest of Paris.”







realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=1968




Vélizy-Villacoublay Air Base, near Paris, France
(Photo: Google)


















Satellite photo of Paris, France (tageo.com)
(Photo: tageo.com)

Tuesday, 19 January 2016

UFO Article (Blog):
“Saucer over Beausejour, Manitoba,
on April 3, 1968”


By Chris A. Rutkowski, 22 July 2015
(Ufology Research, Winnipeg, Canada)

Rutkowski presents a 9 April 1968 The Beaver (Beausejour, Canada) UFO newspaper article:

http://uforum.blogspot.ca/2015/07/saucer-over-beausejour-manitoba-on.html

The article mentions that Eastern Manitoba experienced a rash of UFO sightings in early 1968.



(1.bp.blogspot.com/uforum.blogspot.com image)

Monday, 30 March 2009

U.S. Civil Defense Agency Performed Radiation Testing
of UFO Witness, Castle Rock, Colorado, January 1968

MUFON’s journal is an excellent source for those who search for UFO evidence unearthed or recorded by world media and government sources.

Skylook article, April 1968, Page 2:

http://www.theblackvault.com/encyclopedia/documents/MUFON/Journals/1968/April_1968.pdf

“FLYING BUBBLE IN COLORADO

Howard Ellis, businessman, 42, first saw the bubble hovering about 50 feet above him. It had a dozen lights ‘the color of car headlights that had mud on them’ shining down on him. The bubble seemed to be transparent and silent.

Others watched the object as it hovered over the Douglas County courthouse and then it shot straight up and disappeared, shooting out a couple balls of flame.

An Air Force and Federal Aviation Administration spokesman said no aircraft were known to be in the area at the time, and Morris Felming, director of the Douglas County Civil Defense Agency, said his agency would test Ellis’ blood to see if any radiation of unknown or foreign matter was in his bloodstream.”

The Douglas County Civil Defense Agency obviously took the UFO report by Howard Ellis seriously. We have also previously seen in numerous instances involving government agencies in the U.S. and other countries, and their response to UFO incidents, that they take the UFO issue seriously.

And, for obvious reasons (or reason), it’s always interesting to note when a businessman reports a UFO sighting.

















Satellite photo of Castle Rock, Colorado (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

Saturday, 30 July 2016

UFO Case Directory:
“Category 1, Distant Encounters
Silvery Disc Seen Through Theodolite
April 1947
Richmond, Virginia”


(NICAP.org)

The whole UFO case report:
“Brad Sparks:
April 1947; Richmond, Virginia (BBU)
11 a.m. (EST). Meteorologist Minczewski saw a silvery disc through a theodolite while tracking a pibal weather balloon, traveling E to W at less than 15,000 ft, appeared larger than the balloon. (McDonald 1968; FOIA; FUFOR Index)

Fran Ridge:
There is a document which reads: "... Mr. Walter Minezewski has observed this strange metallic disc on three occasions through the theodolite while making his pibal observation during the last six months (November, 1946 - April, 1947)" **.  In the other document:  "There  is no astronomical explanation for this Incident, which, however,  deserves considerable attention, because of the experience of the observers ana the fact that the observation was made through a theodolite and that conparison could be made with a pibal balloon. The observers had, therefore, a good estimate of altitude, of relative size, and of speed  much more reliable than those given in most reports.This investigator would like to recommend that these and other pibal observers be quizzed as to other possible un-reported sightings." *

James McDonald:
Here was a pre-Arnold sighting never reported officially. It was quite clearly not an observation of "new American military vehicles," nor can one readily square this with any phenomenon of atmospheric physics or astronomy. It is a UFO observation, and a rather interesting one. Bloecher's search has led to several other pre-Arnold 1947 sightings. Just a matter of days before this writing, I spoke on the telephone with Walter A. Minczewski, the U. S. Weather Bureau observer whose April, 1947, theodolite-tracking case is cited in the text. Minczewski emphasized that he had never reported it to other than his Weather Bureau superiors and hence was surprised to be called about it twenty years later. Yet his recollection of the details of the whitish disc-like object he had tracked one clear morning in Richmond, Virginia, was still distinct in his mind.”

The UFO incident occurred on 1 April 1947, according to the book, UFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry.

NICAP.org presents a U.S. government (U.S. Air Force) document that pertains to the UFO case.

























“IMET Carl Gorski prepares to track a Pilot Balloon (PIBAL)” 
(text by noaa.gov) (noaa.gov) (noaa.gov photo)

Tuesday, 24 December 2019

UFO News Article:
“FOR MORE ON UFO – Air Force Asks
St. Joseph, Mo., Official for Report”


22 April 1968
(The Kansas City Star, Missouri)

Sources: U.S. Air Force (Project Blue Book) and Fold3.com

The whole article:
“Assistance in obtaining information concerning a reported unidentified flying object in the Gower, Mo., area [Groveton, Missouri] 4:30 o’clock in the morning, February 9 [1968], was asked of John C. Riley, jr., city aviation director, by the Air Force.

The request came from Maj. Hector Quintanilla, chief of the Aerial Phenomena office of the Foreign Technology division of the Air Force headquarters at the Wright Patterson base in Ohio.

The letter from the Air Force stated:

The Aerial Phenomena office is in receipt of an unidentified flying object report from Gower, Mo.

The observer [a farmer at a farm] sighted an extremely bright light and also heard a noise. It sounded similar to the swish of a piece of wire, whirled at high speed above a person’s head, and had pulsating rhythm of some kind. Initially the object was hovering, but when it moved toward the southwest, the noise was two or three louder and the sound pulsations were more rapid.”


Wikipedia article: “Gower, Missouri”:


Related posts:


realtvufos.blogspot.com/2019/02/ufo-case-report-e-mail-subject-groveton.html

















(ufocasebook.com image)


















Satellite photo of Gower, Missouri (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

Monday, 22 April 2019

UFO News Article:
“Military Undergoes Special Alert”


18 April 1952
(Associated Press (New York City, New York) article)

Source: theufochronicles.com

The whole article:
“All agencies of the nation’s military establishment were placed on special readiness yesterday because of a ‘pattern of unknowns [UFOs] which appeared potentially dangerous,’ the Air Defense command said today.

In a statement issued through the Eastern Defense Command headquarters at Stewart Field, the Air Defense Command said: ‘Our detection system developed a pattern of unknowns in both the Northeast and Northwest which apepared [sic] [appeared] potentially dangerous. We alerted all agencies of the national military establishment until the unknowns were identified, after which the period of special readiness was called off.

‘It would be an error to say that such an alert is not unusual. However, it is the function that the Air Defense Command was organized to perform.

The Air Defense Command declined to elaborate upon its statement or the situation which caused the ‘period’ of special readiness.’ ”


Wikipedia article: “Aerospace Defense Command”:


Quote from the Wikipedia article:
“Aerospace Defense Command was a major command of the United States Air Forces, responsible for continental air defence. It was activated in 1968 and disbanded in 1980. Its predecessor, Air Defense Command, was established in 1946, briefly inactivated in 1950, reactivated in 1951, and then redesignated Aerospace rather than Air in 1968. Its mission was to provide air defense of the Continental United States (CONUS). It directly controlled all active measures, and was tasked to coordinate all passive means of air defense.”

Related posts:




realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=1952













(wikimedia.org image)













(wikimedia.org image)











Air Defense Command map (1966) shows the ADC’s Air Divisions
(radomes.org) (radomes.org image)

Monday, 28 October 2013

UFO Articles (Blog):
“Peter E Norris and the Australian Government UFO files – 1957 to 1968”


By Keith Basterfield
(UFOs – scientific research, Campbelltown,
New South Wales, Australia)

Keith Basterfield reports on the UFO research work of Melbourne citizen Peter E. Norris:
















The official badge of the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) (wikimedia.org image)

Friday, 22 March 2013

UFO Article:
“Remembering Jim Moseley (1931-2012),
the Voltaire of American Ufology”
by J. Antonio Huneeus, 23 November 2012
(OpenMinds.tv, Tempe, Arizona)

James W. Moseley ran the publication, Saucer Smear (formerly Saucer News):














James W. Moseley (29 April 1968), U.S. UFO Researcher

(anomalyarchives.files.wordpress.com)
(anomalyarchives.files.wordpress.com photo)

Friday, 6 April 2012

UFO News Article:
“UFO Expert at Upper Iowa”, 

18 October 1967
(The Telegraph-Herald, Dubuque, Iowa and
East Dubuque, Illinois)


This is an article about UFO researcher James W. Moseley:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=egdRAAAAIBAJ&sjid=xsAMAAAAIBAJ&pg=2552,2799965

At present, Moseley runs the publication, Saucer Smear (formerly Saucer News).

NOTE: The newspaper date is 18 October 1967.













James W. Moseley (29 April 1968), U.S. UFO Researcher
(anomalyarchives.files.wordpress.com)
(anomalyarchives.files.wordpress.com photo)

Thursday, 3 June 2010

UFO News Article:
“A Full Time Flying Saucer Organization”,
12 April 1968 (Lodi News-Sentinel, California)

This is an article about the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization (APRO):

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=42czAAAAIBAJ&sjid=fTIHAAAAIBAJ&pg=7221,1530961

APRO was founded in 1952 by the late Jim and Coral Lorenzen.

The UFO research group was based in Tucson, Arizona and remained active until 1988. APRO had many state branches.

Answers.com article: “Aerial Phenomena Research Organization”:

http://www.answers.com/topic/aerial-phenomena-research-organization













Jim and Coral Lorenzen, U.S. UFO Researchers
(1bp.blogspot.com photo)

Saturday, 10 September 2016

UFO Article (Blog):
“Significant Discovery Of US Military
Records Highlighting ‘UFO Problem’
During The Vietnam War – Part 1”


By Paul Dean, 29 August 2016
(UFOs – Documenting The Evidence, Melbourne, Australia)

Quote from the article (the text in italics comes from U.S. military documents):
“The question, which I have grappled with previously, is a one of terminology. Is the term ‘UFO’ a ‘catchall’ for anything unknown and flying? One would ask, why wouldn’t military personal simply use terminology like ‘unknown helicopter’ or ‘unidentified aircraft’ or ‘suspected flak’? The fact of the matter is, they often did. Interestingly though, these more routine terms occurred alongside with, and distinct from, the term ‘UFO.’ But, without more information, we just don’t quite know what fits into the ‘UFO’ basket and what doesn’t. It has been argued that ‘UFOs’ reported during the Vietnam War must have all been North Vietnamese helicopters. With this in mind, it is worth highlighting a United States Army ‘Daily Journal’ entry which was found in the records of the 23rd Infantry Division’s Chu Lai Defense Command. Dated January the 6th, 1969, it says:

‘Twr 72 rpts object flying into their area about 700m infront of them, AZ 310°. Object came in slow over the ASP & landed. When object moves it has a glowing light. It is about 15 – 20 ft across. It is shaped like a big egg. Control twr rpts their radar did not pick anything up. Object also does not seem to have any sound to it when it moves.’

‘During Feb, there were 173 Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) Sightings.’

‘During Mar, there were 190 UFO Sightings.’

On Page 27, there is another entry regarding UFOs, and it applies to the month of April, 1969. It is important here to note that there appears to be a mistake in the author’s text. Instead of correctly listing April as the time period being discussed, they have written March. As I said above, March had already been covered with its apparent 190 sightings. To quote exactly, it states:

‘During Mar, there were 46 UFO Sightings.’

‘During the entire reporting period, concerted efforts were made to identify UFOs. Further discussion of these efforts is precluded by the classification of this report.’

‘Current action on UFOs was initiated in Nov 68 when the 4th Inf Div requested a Restricted Flying Area/Defense Identification Zone in order to aid in the identification of unidentified flying objects. In early Jan 69, a message was received from COMUSMACV directing that HAWK acquisition radars would be furnished by the 6th Bn 56th Arty, to aid in UFO detection and identification. On or about 25 Jan the following radars were received accompanied by operating personnel: (1) Pulse Acquisition Radar; (2) Continual Wave Acquisition Radar; and (3) Illumination Radar. These were placed in operation the night of 31 Jan with the radar CP located at LZ Oasis. The Air Force provided a liaison officer at the CP. Presently, the Air Force and the 4th Inf Div are gathering data for analysis; the Air Force will not grant engagement clearance while objects are in the air as positive identification as hostile has yet to be determined.’

‘Another facet of target identification involved confirming the many visual, radar, and infrared sightings. No ‘hard evidence’ such as photographs or wreckage was obtained. On three successive August nights, RF–4s flew a total of 12 sorties against 34 radar–plotted UFO targets. The photos showed no helicopters despite several runs which, according to the radar, passed directly over the targets. On 28 August, an RF–4C using photo flash cartridges ran controlled tests to photograph a friendly helicopter at night. Of 38 exposed frames made on four passes, only two frames showed the helicopter. The summary of results to the 7AF Command Section said…’

‘This test confirms previous opinion by DOCR that chances of photographing one of the UFOs in the DMZ is extremely remote… …Even the two successful exposures required last minute flight correction by a DOCR representative riding in the lead helicopter.’

‘Two special projects were established to observe the UFOs from Con Thien, the highest hill in the eastern DMZ area. The primary mission of project HAVE FEAR did not concern the helicopter reports, but this Air Force Weapons Laboratory project had laser range finders and night observation devices (NOD) that offered some chance of identifying the sightings. HAVE FEAR personnel saw red lights and got video blips. The UFOs usually traveled at speeds from 30 to 80 mph at altitudes from 1,200 to 1,600 feet. After several days of tracking, the red blinking lights would extinguish when under HAVE FEAR surveillance. The project ran from 4–12 August 1968 and resumed from 18–31 August.’

‘In mid-August, HAVE FEAR was joined by Project LETHAL CHASER, which used manpack radar. From 18 August through 3 September 1968, the several observation systems conducted a joint, integrated search that also employed Waterboy radar. The criteria for a valid track included the UFO being within 11 miles of Con Thien, being unidentified by Jazzy Control, having a track of at least two minutes duration, and traveling at less than 180 mph. This joint effort got 67 valid tracks, but no conclusive identifications.

By late August, the helicopter situation dwindled away into occasional sightings and little new technical data. Several times the peculiarities of the tracks and the lack of confirmation where expected (such as from troops in the plotted area) defied adequate explanation. The 7AF Commander decided the results could not justify continuing the projects and MACV concurred.’

As we can see, there are a number of endnotes in the above text. Endnotes 132 and 135 are listed as a document titled ‘Msg, 7AF to COMUSMACV, ‘Summary Report of UFOs in DMZ,’ 19 Sep 68. Endnote 133, is listed as ‘Memo, Col Michael J. Quirk, DOC, 7AF, ‘Test–Night Photo of Helicopters,’ undated (About 30 Aug 68).’ Endnote 134 is listed as ‘Msg, Det 1, 620th TCS to 7AF, ‘HAVE FEAR,’ 25 Aug 68; (S/NF) Memo, ‘Intelligence Annex (Enemy Helicopters),’ undated (Late Aug 68).’ This leaves no doubt that the information conveyed in these pages was gleaned directly from raw, established USAF authority.

‘An additional function mentioned in this report was that of monitoring UFO reports. Information was relayed from forward observation posts through counter-battery intelligence channels to the FSCC, where the liaison team gathered all necessary information into the proper format and passed it on to the appropriate air defense agencies.’ ”



































(3.bp.blogspot.com/
ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com image)

Wednesday, 5 April 2017

30th Air Division’s Official History Excerpts:
“30th Air Division UFO Reports”


(30th Air Division, U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C.)

Source: PROJECT 1947

Quote from the UFO report:
“The 30th Air Division, active from 1949 until 1968, was originally based at Selfridge Air Force Base, Michigan.  The station then moved to Willow Run Airport (later Willow Run Air Force Station), Michigan, on 7 April, 1952, before transferring to Truax Field, Wisconsin.  The Division was finally declared inactive at Sioux City Municipal Airport, Iowa, on 18 September, 1968.

Assigned to the Air Defense Command (ADC) for most of its existence, the 30th’s initial mission was the equipping, administering, training, and provisioning of operationally ready forces to the appropriate commanders for the air defense of upper Great Lakes area of the United States. Their Area of Operation included maintaining air defenses above the closely guarded AEC nuclear facilities at the Oak Ridge plant, Tennessee.

The following UFO reports are excerpted from the 30th Air Division’s Official History between 1950 and 1952.”

http://www.project1947.com/fig/30adufos.htm













(project1947.com image)













(wikimedia.org image)