Showing posts sorted by relevance for query August 1969. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query August 1969. Sort by date Show all posts

Saturday, 17 October 2020

UFO Article (Blog):
“1969: The Great UFO Daze of OZ”

By Bill Chalker, 19 September 2020

(The OZ Files, Sydney, Australia)

Quote from the article:

“1969 Australian cases described in this story:

  • 17 April: the Bungawalbyn ‘saucer nest’, NSW
  • 20 April: the Harwood Island close encounter with possible ‘levitation’ effects, NSW
  • 25 April: the ‘Anzac Day’ close encounter of the third kind in suburban Sydney - Greenacre, NSW
  • 23 May: a compelling ‘radar visual’ case - Cloverdale/Kalamunda, Western Australia
  • mid July: a close encounter at Beaufort, Victoria
  • 30 August: my own daylight experience with apparent ‘angel hair’
  • the dramatic close encounter at Surfers Paradise, Qld, witnessed by Australian surfing legend Peter Drouyn
  • I've also added at the end of this post a few further bonus stories from the 1969 UFO wave in OZ, including:
  • the Spackman UFO photo saga
  • the strange story of the Vas family in January 1969 who were reported as telling a story of a UFO and its giant occupants, encountered near Childers, Queensland - was it a real encounter?”

http://theozfiles.blogspot.com/2020/09/1969-great-ufo-daze-of-oz.html

Related posts:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=April+1969

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=May+1969

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=July+1969

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=August+1969

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=1969



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Map of Australia (lib.utexas.edu)

(Image: lib.utexas.edu)

Wednesday, 20 November 2019

UFO Case Report:
“July 13, 1969; Van Horne, IA”


(NICAP.org)

The whole UFO case report:
“11:00 PM. A high school girl was having her cousin [a beautician] over for a visit and a sleep-over. The two young women were still up when they heard a sound outside. Looking out their window, they saw an object above the field across the road. It was less than a mile away. The thing appeared to be a gray metallic disk, non-luminous, but with a orange-red band of light around the circumference. This light enabled the girls to see the shape clearly: like ‘a shallow inverted bowl with a curved bottom’. The object was ‘clean’ [no protrusions nor individual lights]. The object came directly over the farmhouse, its vibrations rattling the bedroom windows. [The parents were asleep already and did not awaken]. The girls felt that the disk was ‘the size of an automobile’ and was rotating counter-clockwise as it rose and sailed away. The next morning they told the one girl’s parents what had happened but were not believed. That morning however, the father was out walking the fields and came across a forty foot diameter circle of dried out soybean crop, which had not previously been there. This area was not only a ‘perfect’ circle but in the proper location for the sighting of the UFO. The appearance of the affected crop was ‘all of the leaves of each plant were hanging wilted from the stalks’ as if, the UFO field researcher hypothesized, ‘they had been subjected to intense heat’. The spot was apparently the result of a ‘near-landing’ rather than an actual touch-down, as the plants were not broken off nor crushed. A fine aerial photo of this circle has been made and is attached to this report. The UFO community was on the scene relatively early, with the APRO investigator taking the photos and soil samples, and Walt Andrus of MUFON/APRO interviewing the daughter [the only early interview of the cousin was by news persons]. As was almost universally the case APRO dropped the ball on the analysis of the samples and reported only that the plants were dry, shriveled, and not radioactive.  Dr. J. Allen Hynek even visited the site and was later quoted: ‘I still don’t know what the hell this thing is all about... It looked as though a big heater had been held six feet above the ground’. Neighbors of the family contributed the remarks that their dogs were making a racket that evening. Van Horne stands as one of the best ‘landing effects’ cases on record. This is because it has multiple witnesses, an immediate corroberation [sic] of the trace by someone who knew exactly the state of his farm fields, no desire for publicity [in fact a parent who blocked almost all of it], no motivation [in fact, a loss of valuable crop], multiple, early-on-scene investigators with good track records for straight-shooting, and a fairly large and mysterious effect. On some scales of rating ‘trace’ cases, this might be #1. [Mike Swords; References: a). APRO UFO Report Form (case field investigation), undated but c. September 1969 (Hynek/CUFOS files); ‘Saucer Near Landing In Iowa’, SKYLOOK #23, October 1969; ‘UFO Over Iowa Bean Field’, APRO Bulletin, July-August 1969: Kevin Randle, ‘The Iowa UFO Landings’, Official UFO Fall 1976; [news note] DATA-NET V(9): September 1971; Al Swegle, ‘Sight UFO Over Benton County Farm’, Cedar Rapids Gazette, August 15, 1969.]”

I also presented this UFO case report on 24 March 2016.


Wikipedia article: “Van Horne, Iowa”:


Related posts:






realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Animal+Reaction









The 13 July 1969 Van HorneIowa, UFO landing imprint 
(CE2 case – soybean crop)
(4.bp.blogspot.com/thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com photo)














Satellite photo of Cedar Rapids, Iowa (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

UFO News Article:
“Sight UFO Over Benton County Farm”


6 August 1969
(The Gazette, Cedar Rapids, Iowa)

Source: Newspapers.com

The whole article:
“Under any other set of circumstances, Warren ‘Bud’ Barr would say lightning struck his soybean fields the evening of Sunday, July 13 [1969].

While he was doing chores the following morning, the Benton County farmer noticed that a 15-foot circular area in his bean field had been charred to the ground. No other part of the field was touched.

At breakfast his 15-year-old daughter, Pat, and her cousin, Kathy Mahr, 19, gave him another explanation for the barren spot.

‘Kathy and I were about to go to bed at 11 Sunday evening, when we looked out our west window and saw red-orange lights hovering just a few hundred feet from the house,’ Pat recalled.

Black Object

The black metallic object was moving and vanished over a neighbour’s field northwest of the Barr home. The object was about the same size as the barren spot in the soybean field.

‘I know that it wasn’t a jet, a helicopter, or a small plane,’ Pat said. ‘It was shaped like two saucers put together upside down.’

The Barr family doesn’t say that the object was from another planet. But their beans haven’t had any trouble with armyworms either.

It could have been lightning, Bud Barr believes, but he hasn’t tried to collect on his crop insurance. The family said the air was quiet around 11 p.m., although it had rained earlier in the evening.

Lightning Effects

When lightning strikes, the center of a circular area is usually barren, but the edges taper off, Vivian Jennings, Cedar Rapids area extension crops specialist, said. In Barr’s field, the whole 15-foot area was barren, and other portions of the field were not affected.

The family weren’t able to find any imprints in the area, and they did not report the strange activities to authorities.

Several citizens reported what they believed to be an unidentified flying object near the Cedar Rapids municipal airport in June. The Cedar Rapids municipal airport air traffic control tower has not had any reports of unusual activity on June 13, although they usually ask that citizens forward reports on to military authorities at Offutt air force base, Omaha, or University of Colorado, Colorado Springs.

No Life

Two space flights since then have eliminated the theory that the object might have been sent from the moon or Mars. There isn’t any life on Mars, you’ll recall.

‘But it could have been from Venus,’ Pat said. ‘Imagine what their scientists would say if they thought earth was a giant Iowa soybean field.’ Pat is a senior at Benton Community high school.

The Barr farm is located approximately five miles northwest of Vinton.”

The article contains a photo of Warren Barr’s soybean field.

NOTE: NICAP.org and other credible UFO research sources
report that Warren Barr’s farm was located just outside Van
Horne (located just west of Cedar Rapids). Van Horne is
located to the south west of Vinton.


Wikipedia article: “Van Horne, Iowa”:


Related posts:



realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=1969









The 13 July 1969 Van HorneIowa, UFO landing imprint 
(CE2 case – soybean crop)
(4.bp.blogspot.com/thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com photo)














Satellite photo of Cedar Rapids, Iowa (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

Saturday, 10 September 2016

UFO Article (Blog):
“Significant Discovery Of US Military
Records Highlighting ‘UFO Problem’
During The Vietnam War – Part 1”


By Paul Dean, 29 August 2016
(UFOs – Documenting The Evidence, Melbourne, Australia)

Quote from the article (the text in italics comes from U.S. military documents):
“The question, which I have grappled with previously, is a one of terminology. Is the term ‘UFO’ a ‘catchall’ for anything unknown and flying? One would ask, why wouldn’t military personal simply use terminology like ‘unknown helicopter’ or ‘unidentified aircraft’ or ‘suspected flak’? The fact of the matter is, they often did. Interestingly though, these more routine terms occurred alongside with, and distinct from, the term ‘UFO.’ But, without more information, we just don’t quite know what fits into the ‘UFO’ basket and what doesn’t. It has been argued that ‘UFOs’ reported during the Vietnam War must have all been North Vietnamese helicopters. With this in mind, it is worth highlighting a United States Army ‘Daily Journal’ entry which was found in the records of the 23rd Infantry Division’s Chu Lai Defense Command. Dated January the 6th, 1969, it says:

‘Twr 72 rpts object flying into their area about 700m infront of them, AZ 310°. Object came in slow over the ASP & landed. When object moves it has a glowing light. It is about 15 – 20 ft across. It is shaped like a big egg. Control twr rpts their radar did not pick anything up. Object also does not seem to have any sound to it when it moves.’

‘During Feb, there were 173 Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO) Sightings.’

‘During Mar, there were 190 UFO Sightings.’

On Page 27, there is another entry regarding UFOs, and it applies to the month of April, 1969. It is important here to note that there appears to be a mistake in the author’s text. Instead of correctly listing April as the time period being discussed, they have written March. As I said above, March had already been covered with its apparent 190 sightings. To quote exactly, it states:

‘During Mar, there were 46 UFO Sightings.’

‘During the entire reporting period, concerted efforts were made to identify UFOs. Further discussion of these efforts is precluded by the classification of this report.’

‘Current action on UFOs was initiated in Nov 68 when the 4th Inf Div requested a Restricted Flying Area/Defense Identification Zone in order to aid in the identification of unidentified flying objects. In early Jan 69, a message was received from COMUSMACV directing that HAWK acquisition radars would be furnished by the 6th Bn 56th Arty, to aid in UFO detection and identification. On or about 25 Jan the following radars were received accompanied by operating personnel: (1) Pulse Acquisition Radar; (2) Continual Wave Acquisition Radar; and (3) Illumination Radar. These were placed in operation the night of 31 Jan with the radar CP located at LZ Oasis. The Air Force provided a liaison officer at the CP. Presently, the Air Force and the 4th Inf Div are gathering data for analysis; the Air Force will not grant engagement clearance while objects are in the air as positive identification as hostile has yet to be determined.’

‘Another facet of target identification involved confirming the many visual, radar, and infrared sightings. No ‘hard evidence’ such as photographs or wreckage was obtained. On three successive August nights, RF–4s flew a total of 12 sorties against 34 radar–plotted UFO targets. The photos showed no helicopters despite several runs which, according to the radar, passed directly over the targets. On 28 August, an RF–4C using photo flash cartridges ran controlled tests to photograph a friendly helicopter at night. Of 38 exposed frames made on four passes, only two frames showed the helicopter. The summary of results to the 7AF Command Section said…’

‘This test confirms previous opinion by DOCR that chances of photographing one of the UFOs in the DMZ is extremely remote… …Even the two successful exposures required last minute flight correction by a DOCR representative riding in the lead helicopter.’

‘Two special projects were established to observe the UFOs from Con Thien, the highest hill in the eastern DMZ area. The primary mission of project HAVE FEAR did not concern the helicopter reports, but this Air Force Weapons Laboratory project had laser range finders and night observation devices (NOD) that offered some chance of identifying the sightings. HAVE FEAR personnel saw red lights and got video blips. The UFOs usually traveled at speeds from 30 to 80 mph at altitudes from 1,200 to 1,600 feet. After several days of tracking, the red blinking lights would extinguish when under HAVE FEAR surveillance. The project ran from 4–12 August 1968 and resumed from 18–31 August.’

‘In mid-August, HAVE FEAR was joined by Project LETHAL CHASER, which used manpack radar. From 18 August through 3 September 1968, the several observation systems conducted a joint, integrated search that also employed Waterboy radar. The criteria for a valid track included the UFO being within 11 miles of Con Thien, being unidentified by Jazzy Control, having a track of at least two minutes duration, and traveling at less than 180 mph. This joint effort got 67 valid tracks, but no conclusive identifications.

By late August, the helicopter situation dwindled away into occasional sightings and little new technical data. Several times the peculiarities of the tracks and the lack of confirmation where expected (such as from troops in the plotted area) defied adequate explanation. The 7AF Commander decided the results could not justify continuing the projects and MACV concurred.’

As we can see, there are a number of endnotes in the above text. Endnotes 132 and 135 are listed as a document titled ‘Msg, 7AF to COMUSMACV, ‘Summary Report of UFOs in DMZ,’ 19 Sep 68. Endnote 133, is listed as ‘Memo, Col Michael J. Quirk, DOC, 7AF, ‘Test–Night Photo of Helicopters,’ undated (About 30 Aug 68).’ Endnote 134 is listed as ‘Msg, Det 1, 620th TCS to 7AF, ‘HAVE FEAR,’ 25 Aug 68; (S/NF) Memo, ‘Intelligence Annex (Enemy Helicopters),’ undated (Late Aug 68).’ This leaves no doubt that the information conveyed in these pages was gleaned directly from raw, established USAF authority.

‘An additional function mentioned in this report was that of monitoring UFO reports. Information was relayed from forward observation posts through counter-battery intelligence channels to the FSCC, where the liaison team gathered all necessary information into the proper format and passed it on to the appropriate air defense agencies.’



































(3.bp.blogspot.com/
ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com image)

Monday, 14 October 2013

UFO Journal Issue:
“Skylook”


No. 21, August 1969
(Midwest UFO Network, Stover, Missouri)

The issue contains the news article, “Silver Disc Seen in Michigan.”

The whole article:
“A state trooper from the Jonesville Post and a motorist driving along US-12 reported sighting an unidentified object in the sky heading northwest and photographed it Tuesday (July 2nd) (1969) at 2:05 p.m.

The driver, Ray Ostarmyer, of 9603 Bay Cuel Road, Erie, spotted the object, described as a silver disc, while driving west toward Moscow, and stopped along the highway.

Trooper D. J. Fenton on his way to the post, stopped to question Ostarmyer. Both Fenton and Ostarmyer took pictures of the mysterious object and reports from the police photographic laboratory in East Lansing are pending.

‘The object appeared to be semi-round. At times it appeared to be elongated, like a blimp, and other tines it appeared to be round,’ Trooper Fenton said. He estimated the elevation to be 1,500 feet. ‘It was stationary for a period, and then took off,’ Fenton reported.

Clinton C. Williams Jr, APRO investigator, is following the developments, and he has found there are numerous sightings in Hillsdale County during the summer months.

Source: ‘Hillsdale Daily News’ (Michigan) 7/3/69; credit– –Lou Farish.”


Wikipedia article: “Hillsdale County, Michigan”:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillsdale_County,_Michigan






















Hillsdale County’s location in Michigan
(wikimedia.org image)

Thursday, 8 September 2016

UFO Article (Blog):
“Finally, US Air Force Records Discovered
Confirming UFO Activity During The Striking
Of The HMAS Hobart – Part 1”


By Paul Dean, 11 August 2016
(UFOs – Documenting The Evidence, Melbourne, Australia)

HMAS Hobart was attacked by a United States Air Force F–4 Phantom Fighter-Bomber on 17 June 1968.

Quote from the article:
“The report that mentions the HMAS Hobart is titled ‘Project CHECO South East Asia Report: Air War In The DMZ September 1967 – June 1968.’ It was produced by the 7th Air Force’s (7AF) Directorate of Tactical Evaluation, Headquarters, Pacific Air Forces (HQ PACAF), and was published on the 1st of August, 1969. Signed off by Col. Warren H. Peterson, the report was originally classified SECRET/AIR FORCE EYES ONLY, the report was only declassified on the 17th of August, 2006. In relation to the HMAS Hobart and UFO’s, on pages forty–five and forty–six it states:

‘The several direct hits or near misses on friendly vessels by the Air Force missiles obviously raised the question of what went wrong with target acquisition. The pilots, based on their radar and visual sightings, fired at what they thought were helicopters. The joint service conference on the UFO problem took note of one possibility…’

This passage ends with an endnote, namely, number ‘128.’ The next passage of text is a quote taken directly from raw USAF records, and it states:

‘It is important to note that only in the case of the Hobart were the recorded targets in close proximity to ships. It is possible that targets fired on were airborne and that missiles subsequently [were] guided on the stronger radar return from ships in the vicinity.’ 

So what can we take from this? The fact that USAF attempted to make sense of these elusive ‘visual, radar, and infrared sightings,’ by organising the photographing of them, is something that we scarcely see in the established official record. The statement ‘…On three successive August nights, RF–4s flew a total of 12 sorties against 34 radar–plotted UFO targets’ demonstrates clearly the urgency of the situation. The statement about the ‘…chances of photographing one of the UFOs in the DMZ is extremely remote…’ indicates that a fair degree of discussion must have taken place over the matter. If that is not enough, note the passage of text which states ‘…two special projects were established to observe the UFOs….’ There is no question that something odd was going on. To use the frowned–upon term ‘UFO’ so readily implies that US forces had few clues as to what they were visually witnessing and plotting on radar systems. Also, as I mentioned at the beginning of this entry, the term ‘UFO’ is utilised as distinct from terms like ‘hostile aircraft,’ ‘flak,’ ‘rocket barrage,’ ‘formation of planes’ and so forth.”


Wikipedia article: “HMAS Hobart (D 39)”:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMAS_Hobart_(D_39)

Quote from the Wikipedia article:
“HMAS Hobart (D 39) was a Perth class guided missile destroyer of the Royal Australian Navy (RAN).”











HMAS Hobart in California, 1992 (wikimedia.org)
(wikimedia.org photo)

Thursday, 5 April 2018

UFO News Article:
“Untold Stories: The day I saw
an unidentified flying object”


9 June 2017
(ABC News, Sydney, Australia)

The article reports on Australia Department of Civil Aviation radar controller Alan Potter’s August 1969 UFO experience.

Potter was tracking a Fokker Friendship flight when the radar pinged a much larger unknown object.

After a while, a much smaller object than the Fokker appeared to leave the large echo before flying towards the airplane.

Potter saw that the two signals met in the skies over Rapid Bay, south of Adelaide, and then watched the smaller object return to the larger object.

The rotation of the radar took five seconds. In that time – the large unknown object travelled 70 nautical miles to the north east. In the next pass the object had disappeared off the screen.  

A lot of UFO incidents occurred in Adelaide in the late 1960s, according to the article.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-09/the-day-i-saw-an-unidentified-flying-object/8600366


















Satellite photo of Adelaide, Australia (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

Saturday, 23 May 2020

UFO News Article:
“Magazine is based in Stover –
If you’re a UFO enthusiast, then turn to ‘Skylook’ ”


5 August 1973
(The Sedalia Democrat, Missouri)

Source: NewspaperArchive.com

The whole article:
“Wherever there is a group of people who share a common interest, you are likely to find a special interest magazine. Now there’s one for people whose hobby or science (depending on their degree of involvement) is hunting unidentified flying objects (UFO’s). It’s a 20 page ‘ufozine’ called ‘Skylook.’

The editor and publisher of ‘Skylook’ is a mild-mannered retiree named Mrs. Norma Short, Stover. She spends about six hours a day editing and rewriting reports of UFO sightings received through daily correspondence.

Mrs. Short explained that the ‘Skylook’ policy ‘has always been to ‘tell it as it is,’ and to separate fact from fantasy in investigating and reporting UFO sightings. We do not carry reports of little green men from Mars or messages from outer space relayed through ‘contactees.’ We don’t build up a story for greater reader interest. We believe  the truth is exciting enough in itself and needs no embellishment.’

Though most of ‘Skylook’s’ material reports UFO sightings, it does include other articles, such as [‘Astronomy Notes’] which informs the reader of where to look each month for planets and stars.

To avoid confusion

‘Learning to recognize these planets and stars prevents confusing them with UFO’s,’ Mrs. Short said.

The magazine even has a column which previews books and other magazines that contain UFO-related material. There also is a regular article titled ‘UFO’s Bahind the Iron Curtain.’ The writer gets his information by corresponding with people in communist countries.

‘Skylook’ was conceived in 1967 when Mrs. Short received a letter from John Kuhn, a student at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. Kuhn asked Mrs. Short if she would consider editing a newsletter on UFO’s. Mrs. Short, who had several years of newspaper experience and was herself a UFO buff, accepted the proposal with delight.

Through the efforts Mrs. Short and Kuhn, ‘Skylook’ was born and served as a newsletter for a UFO study group in St. Louis. Mrs. Short assimilated the information and Kuhn, the ‘publisher,’ mimeographed 30 to 40 copies of the magazine.

The first few issues of ‘Skylook’ endured a period of severe labor pains and its growth was marked with subsequent, sporadic ‘now-and-then’ issues.

In 1969, college responsibilities forced Kuhn to resign as publisher. But Mrs. Short was too involved to give up the cause or the publication. She promptly bought her own mimeograph machine (which she soon dubbed ‘the Monster’) and undertook the task of printing the publication herself.

First issue difficult

‘I cried over that first issue. I didn’t know how to operate the mimeograph machine or apply the ink,’ Mrs. Short said.

It was a product of ‘blood, sweat and tears,’ she added.

While Mrs. Short carried on her duties as editor and publisher of ‘Skylook,’ that St. Louis UFO study group expanded and organized the Midwest UFO Network (MUFON).

Ted Phillips, 1104A West Third, an inspector for the State Highway Department, is also a field investigator for MUFON. He says the purpose of MUFON is ‘to inform the public of UFO sightings, encourage reporting of UFO’s and conduct scientific studies of the phenomenon.’

Phillips became involved with ‘Skylook’ when it began publication in 1967. He was one of the first UFO enthusiasts to contribute to the magazine.

In 1969, MUFON’s officers named ‘Skyllok’ as their official publication. From then on, Mrs. Short published regularly and has not missed an issue.

Since its establishment as a statewide organization in 1969, MUFON has mushroomed into an international group. So, at the MUFON Symposium in Kansas City this past June, the name was changed to Mutual UFO Network.

MUFON also has enlarged its staff to include several reputable scientists such as Dr. David Saunders, a nuclear physicist at the University of Colorado; and Dr. Allen Hynek, director of the Lindheimer Astronomical Research Center, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.

Magazine grows, too

As MUFON has grown in the past four years, so has ‘Skylook.’ Its circulation climbed from 30 to 70 copies a month. Mrs. Short abandoned her mimeograph machine a year ago in favour of offset printing by Morgan County Printers. Readership has expanded from a small group of UFO students to MUFON members (covering 29 states and parts of Canada, Europe and Australia) and other UFO enthusiasts not associated with MUFON.

‘I really get much more material each month than I could possibly use and I don’t even push it here in Stover. You might say that I’ve grown because MUFON has grown.

‘The first few years, I was ‘in the hole’ and had to pay the balance out of my pocket money. But for the past year and a half, ‘Skylook’ has been paying for itself.’

Though Mrs. Short is interested in UFO’s, she is not the type to tramp through woods and cornfields in search of physical traces. For the past year, ‘Skylook’ has been flying high with success and Mrs. Short is content with her role as editor and publisher.

‘This is something I have built up and I enjoy doing. It gives me a chance to write,’ Mrs. Short said. ‘I guess I’m a newswoman at heart. I worked on the Salem Post when I was younger and at that time I would have rather been a reporter than President.’

As editor, Mrs. Short has faith in what she publishes. She does believe there is more to our universe than Earth, and that it is possible for extraterrestrial life to land here.

‘Most of the things people think are UFO’s are really just stars, planets, plane lights or fireflies. But there are too many other ‘sightings’ that are unexplained.

‘We’re going to the [Moon] and will soon land on Mars. So, if there is other intelligent life in the universe, why shouldn’t they come and look at us?’ she said.”

My comment:
The late Mrs. Norma E. Short is without a doubt one of the unsung heroes within the UFO field.

https://newspaperarchive.com/Sedalia-democrat-aug-05-1973-p-13/

Related posts:


realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Skylook























(Democrat-Capital photo/newspaperarchive.com image)