Showing posts sorted by relevance for query 1952 Tremonton, Utah. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query 1952 Tremonton, Utah. Sort by date Show all posts
Wednesday, 2 October 2019
UFO Case Directory (IMCAT):
“The Tremonton, Utah / Newhouse Color Film
July 2, 1952
Tremonton, Utah”
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Fran Ridge:
July 2, 1952; Tremonton ,
Utah (BBU)
11:10 a.m. Navy photographer Delbert C. Newhouse and
his wife, while driving across the state, saw a group of 12-14 shiny silver
objects milling around in the sky. Newhouse stopped and retrieved his 16 mm camera and filmed extensive
footage of the objects. He and his wife both reported seeing some of the
objects relatively close-up and they were shaped like one plate inverted atop
another. When the film was returned to Newhouse following Navy and Air Force
analysis, the frames showing the discs close-up had been deleted. What Newhouse
and his wife saw BEFORE he was able to get the camera out and running,
reportedly, were structured objects, described as ‘gunmetal-colored objects
shaped like two saucers, one inverted on top of the other.’ (*) The Air Force
and the Navy, considering Newhouse’s credibility, spent considerable time and
money on the analyses and to classify the Utah Film as ‘Secret’. Also noted by the analysts was the absence of
any evidence to indicate birds such as fluttering. Air Force & Navy
analysis: ‘Birds and balloons immediately eliminated, within a five mile
radius, aircraft could have easily been determined. In excess of five miles the
objects were moving faster than aircraft could achieve, except in straightline
speed runs.’ And, surprisingly, an FBI letter documents the importance placed
on this incident. **
Update 17 Nov. 2013
Fran Ridge:
Several years ago I had a taped telephone interview
with Newhouse and he stuck to his story throughout. At the very least this was
a good daylight sighting with two witnesses (one very reputable) and good
motion picture footage that neither the Air Force, nor the Navy, nor others
could logically explain. The tape was lost went my basement flooded. My last
contact with him was a letter dated May 29, 2005. *** Newhouse passed away
August 11, 2006 in
Portland , Oregon .”
Freeze-frame of the 2 July 1952 Tremonton , Utah ,
UFOs
(filmed by Delbert
C. Newhouse, Warrant Officer and
Chief Photographer,
U.S. Navy) (gststic.com image)
(tageo.com photo)
Sunday, 17 November 2019
UFO Documentary Film Segment:
“Video Evidence Of UFO Activity
Dismissed By Government |
UFOs: The Lost Evidence”
Published: 8 October 2019
(Discovery, Inc., New York City , New York )
Source: Discovery UK (YouTube channel)
A large part of this documentary segment reports on the
1952 UFO film of Delbert C. Newhouse, a
U.S. Navy Warrant Officer and Chief Photographer.
Quote from NICAP.org’s web page, “The Tremonton, Utah / Newhouse Color Film – July 2, 1952 – Tremonton , Utah ”
(UFO case directory (IMCAT)):
“Fran Ridge:
“Fran Ridge:
July 2, 1952; Tremonton ,
Utah (BBU)
11:10 a.m. Navy photographer Delbert C. Newhouse and
his wife, while driving across the state, saw a group of 12-14 shiny silver
objects milling around in the sky. Newhouse stopped and retrieved his 16 mm camera and filmed
extensive footage of the objects. He and his wife both reported seeing some of
the objects relatively close-up and they were shaped like one plate inverted
atop another. When the film was returned to Newhouse following Navy and Air
Force analysis, the frames showing the discs close-up had been deleted. What
Newhouse and his wife saw BEFORE he was able to get the camera out and running,
reportedly, were structured objects, described as ‘gunmetal-colored objects
shaped like two saucers, one inverted on top of the other.’ (*) The Air Force
and the Navy, considering Newhouse’s credibility, spent considerable time and
money on the analyses and to classify the Utah Film as ‘Secret’. Also noted by the analysts was the absence of
any evidence to indicate birds such as fluttering. Air Force & Navy
analysis: ‘Birds and balloons immediately eliminated, within a five mile
radius, aircraft could have easily been determined. In excess of five miles the
objects were moving faster than aircraft could achieve, except in straightline
speed runs.’ And, surprisingly, an FBI letter documents the importance placed
on this incident. **
Update 17 Nov. 2013
Fran Ridge:
Several years ago I had a taped telephone interview
with Newhouse and he stuck to his story throughout. At the very least this was
a good daylight sighting with two witnesses (one very reputable) and good
motion picture footage that neither the Air Force, nor the Navy, nor others
could logically explain. The tape was lost went my basement flooded. My last
contact with him was a letter dated May 29, 2005. *** Newhouse passed away
August 11, 2006 in
Portland , Oregon .”
I also reported about this UFO case directory on 2 October 2019.
I also reported about this UFO case directory on 2 October 2019.
Wikipedia article: “Discovery, Inc.”:
Freeze-frame
of the 2 July 1952 Tremonton , Utah , UFOs
(filmed
by Delbert
C. Newhouse, Warrant Officer and
Chief Photographer, U.S. Navy (gststic.com image)
Chief Photographer, U.S. Navy (gststic.com image)
Delbert C. Newhouse (left)
(googleusercontent.com image)
Sunday, 6 October 2019
U.S. Government UFO Document:
“Subj: Interpretation of Movies of
Unidentified Objects; progress report on”
4 May 1953
(U.S.
Naval Photographic Interpretation
Center ,
Source: NICAP.org
The document pertains to the 2 July 1952 Tremonton ,
Utah ,
and 15 August 1950 Great Falls , Montana ,
UFO films (filmed by
Warrant Officer and Chief
Photographer Delbert C. Newhouse,
U.S. Navy, and Nicholas Mariana, a civilian, respectively).
U.S. Navy, and Nicholas Mariana, a civilian, respectively).
Quote from the document (not written in U.S.
Department of Defense document format) (Page 15):
“1. … It is
the majority opinion of the group conducting this analysis that these images
are light sources. This will explain the non-blinking and variations in
luminosity – but not the velocity or acceleration factors. In either case,
light source or reflective surface, it appears as if the objects are of a
nature which we are not able to identify in terms of natural phenomena or
commonly known man-made objects.
2. There is
no indication of what kind of objects could have caused the images except that
they must be of a construction, design, and material not commonly known. This
is indicated by the computed acceleration rate and elocity [velocity] (answer 5). For the same reasons,
birds, aircraft and balloons are ruled out.
3. An
analysis of the charts relative to movement indicate that there were group and
individual movement. Within a group it appears as if the individual objects
were moving counter-clock-wise along an elliptical or similar track. Thus when
two objects crossed the camera line of sight they will appear to fuse into one.
As they continued along their paths it will appear as if one object became two.
This occurred at regular intervals at approximately every 25th frame as plotted
in charts 5a and 5b.
4. All objects appear to have the same
characteristics in regards to shape, color, size and relative motion.
5. The
shape of the objects appears to be oblate or disk shaped, color; blue-white,
and maximum and minimum size; 98 and 16 feet . The size is based on the assumption
that the objects are five miles from the observer.
6. Fade in
and fade out of the objects were analyzed as in 3 above. In this case the group
movement was such that the distance between the objects and camera was increased
so that the objects could not be recorded on the film thereby causing the
apparent fade-out. Fade-in as attributed to a shortening of the distance from
the fade-out area to the camera station.
7. Plots of
the groups indicate that the objects move counter-clock-wise relative to the
axis of flight path. However, nothing has been detected which indicates motion
of the individual objects about their own axis although this motion appears to
be likely.
a. The camera was held steady during Part
III of the film.
b. The objects were moving perpendicular to
the optical axis, and
c. The objects were five miles from the
camera.
It is obvious that (b) is a fallacy; however, this
assumption will give the minimum velocity and the actual velocity is greater
than computed. The assumption that the objects are five miles from the camera
is an arbitrary one. However, based on the emulsion speed and focal length, and
object 50 feet
in diameter and five miles from camera will be recorded on the film with
sufficient resolution to identify major details of the object. It is felt that
if these objects were closer than five miles at the time of recording, details
would appear on the film.
Velocity is computed to be 3780 mph for a shift of 1 mm per frame if the object
is five miles from the observer. From 55 measurements taken from Part III of
the Utah
film, the maximum and minimum velocities were 2457 and 378 mph respectively. These
figures differ from those given in reference (c) and were computed from
measurements obtained under more controlled conditions. Acceleration was
determined from the formula: …
Since ‘g’ is equal to 32.17 ft/sec2 it was computed that:
Since ‘g’ is equal to 32.17 ft/sec2 it was computed that:
Maximum acceleration = 21,168 mph/sec
= 965 g
Minimum acceleration = 1,104
mph/sec = 50 g
Maximum deceleration = 32,448
mph/sec = 1479 g
Minimum deceleration = 272 mph/sec = 12 g
Velocity and acceleration determinations were also
made from the Montana
film. In this case, terrestrial objects appeared in the film and were held to
as control. Subsequently, the velocity and acceleration determinations are
considered to be more reliable. On the assumption of (b) and (c) above the
maximum and minimum velocities of the left object are 1374 and 361 mph respectfully. For
the right object they are 1117 and 189 mph . Accelerations were computed as:
Left Object Right Object
Maximum acceleration mph/sec 14,016
= 639 g 12640 = 576g
Minimum acceleration mph/sec 0 = 0 g 0 = 0g
Maximum deceleration mph/sec 13,184
= 601 g 14288 = 651g
Minimum deceleration mph/sec 0 = The above determinations were made from a total of 322 measurements. It was noted that the acceleration and determinations were in multiples of 12.5 approximately. This may be of significance although no study has been conducted to determine this.
9. Velocity
and acceleration were treated in sub-paragraph 8 above. Paragraph 2a indicates
the controls used during this investigation.
10. a. There is no recurring pattern in the relative position of the objects in formation. It appears however, as if the shift in relative positions were regular and that the original formation would be recovered if the continuing action has been recorded.
b. No. However, the same formation is
maintained with objects changing positions.
c. No detection of relative positions being
maintained coincidental with movement about their axis.
d. No detection of undulating motion of
objects in phase either in formation or tumbling motion.
e. There is evidence of abrupt changes in
direction of flight path through fairly large angles.
f. Certain objects do appear to remain motionless while other move about.
g. Certain objects disappear while still well within the field of view. This is discussed in sub-paragraph 6 above.
4. Discussion.
During the study and investigation of the unidentified
objects, the preliminary data uncovered were revealed to experts (with proper
security clearance) in the fields of astronomy and physics. Although they
presented certain natural phenomena theories to explain the cause of the
objects under certain conditions they were not able to do so under the
conditions during which the photography was taken, nor were they able to
recognize these objects as man-made.
As to the results of the investigations being
reported, no attempt was made to corroborate the opinions presented. Because of
the lack of proper equipment, money and personnel, the investigation was
limited. There are obvious tests which can be conducted to prove or disprove
some of the findings presented. It is suggested that these be undertaken.
5. Reference (d) requests spectrophotometric analysis
of the Utah
film be made. Preliminary plan of test id underway.
L. W. KEITH [Officer in
Charge]”
The document was sent to Director of Naval
Intelligence.
NOTE: The document starts on Page 12. Numbers 1 to 10 in
this text are sub-paragraphs. Numbers 4 (Discussion.) and
5 (Reference …) are paragraphs.
this text are sub-paragraphs. Numbers 4 (Discussion.) and
5 (Reference …) are paragraphs.
Wikipedia article: “Office of Naval Intelligence”:
Quote from the Wikipedia article:
“The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) is the military intelligence agency of the United States Navy. Established in 1882 primarily to advance the Navy’s modernization efforts,[4][5] ONI is the oldest member of the United States Intelligence Community and serves as the nation’s premier source of maritime intelligence. Since the First World War, its mission has broadened to include real-time reporting on the developments and activities of foreign navies; protecting maritime resources and interests; monitoring and countering transnational maritime threats; providing technical, operational, and tactical support to the U.S. Navy and its partners; and surveying the global maritime environment. ONI employs over 3,000 military and civilian personnel worldwide and is headquartered at the
Related posts:
(the Delbert C. Newhouse UFO film)
(the Nicholas Mariana UFO film)
(wikimedia.org image)
Freeze-frame of the 2 July 1952 Tremonton , Utah ,
UFOs
(filmed by Delbert
C. Newhouse, Warrant Officer and
Chief Photographer,
U.S. Navy) (gststic.com image)
(tageo.com photo)
Film freeze-frame of the
15 August 1950 Great Falls , Montana , UFOs (filmed by Nicholas Mariana) (ufocasebook.com image)
(tageo.com photo)
Tuesday, 24 February 2009
UFO Film:
The Delbert C. Newhouse (U.S. Navy) UFO Film, Tremonton, Utah, 2 July 1952, 11:00 a.m.
Delbert C. Newhouse was a U.S. Navy Warrant Officer and Chief Photographer.
Newhouse, his wife and their two children were driving along the highway, nine kilometres (six miles) from Tremonton, Utah when his wife noticed several objects in the sky that she could not identify.

Delbert C. Newhouse (left)
The Newhouse UFO film segment from the film, “U.F.O.”, 1956:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=of3m8_LvUWs
(Source: MrCL1O (YouTube channel))
Quote from the video text:
“Included in this video is a rehearsed but accurate interview with Delbert Newhouse regarding the filming. Also included is a summary of the original conclusions of the Photo Reconnaissance Laboratory at Wright Patterson Air Force Base and the U.S. Navy Photo Interpretation Center as well as some breakdown analysis of the footage.”
"U.F.O." REVISITED by Robert Barrow (1976):
http://www.ufologie.net/htm/greenerouseufo.htm
Wikipedia article: “Warrant officer”:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrant_officer
Quote from the Wikipedia article:
The Delbert C. Newhouse (U.S. Navy) UFO Film, Tremonton, Utah, 2 July 1952, 11:00 a.m.
Delbert C. Newhouse was a U.S. Navy Warrant Officer and Chief Photographer.
Newhouse, his wife and their two children were driving along the highway, nine kilometres (six miles) from Tremonton, Utah when his wife noticed several objects in the sky that she could not identify.
Delbert C. Newhouse (left)
The Newhouse UFO film segment from the film, “U.F.O.”, 1956:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=of3m8_LvUWs
(Source: MrCL1O (YouTube channel))
Quote from the video text:
“Included in this video is a rehearsed but accurate interview with Delbert Newhouse regarding the filming. Also included is a summary of the original conclusions of the Photo Reconnaissance Laboratory at Wright Patterson Air Force Base and the U.S. Navy Photo Interpretation Center as well as some breakdown analysis of the footage.”
"U.F.O." REVISITED by Robert Barrow (1976):
http://www.ufologie.net/htm/greenerouseufo.htm
Wikipedia article: “Warrant officer”:
Quote from the Wikipedia article:
“Warrant officers in the United States are classified as
officers and are in the ‘W’ category (NATO ‘WO’); they are technical leaders and
specialists. Chief warrant officers are commissioned by the President of the United States
and take the same oath as regular commissioned officers. They may be technical
experts with a long service as enlisted personnel, or direct entrants such as
U.S. Army helicopter pilots.”
Freeze-frame from the 2 July 1952 Tremonton, Utah , UFO film
(gststic.com image)
Saturday, 17 December 2016
UFO Journal Article:
“ON THE UFOS”
December 1967
(Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Chicago , Illinois )
Source: Google Books
Quote from the article:
“Dr. (Carl) Sagan claims that the Central Intelligence
Agency Robertson Panel, which met in 1953, concluded after a thorough study that
UFOs, ‘all were probably natural phenomena wrongly interpreted.’ This claim
simplifies the work of the panel to the point of distortion.”
The official name of the Robertson Panel was Scientific
Advisory Panel on Unidentified Flying Objects.
The Bulletin article also mentions the 2 July 1952 Tremonton , Utah ,
UFO film (filmed by U.S. Navy Warrant Officer Delbert C. Newhouse).
The article is found on Page 40 (click on the “Front
Cover” button to find the article).
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists was founded by
former Manhattan Project physicists in 1945.
Wikipedia article: “Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists”:
Related posts:
Freeze-frame from the 2 July 1952 Tremonton, Utah , UFO film
(gststic.com image)
Saturday, 30 November 2013
UFO News Article (Blog):
“A tree falls in the woods ...”
By Billy Cox, 25 November 2013
(De Void, Sarasota
Herald-Tribune, Florida)
Billy Cox tells the story about
Jimmie (not Jimmy, see: ditch-the-report-and-just-say-aircraft) Robinson’s UFO sighting:
Robinson, a former White Sands
Missile Range systems analyst and a New Mexico State University astronomer,
sighted the same UFOs (or similar UFOs) which U.S. Navy Warrant Officer and
Chief Photographer Delbert C. Newhouse filmed over Tremonton, Utah on 2 July
1952.
At the time of the sighting, Robinson
was in Eastern New Mexico, more than 600 miles from Tremonton.
Freeze-frame from the 2 July 1952 Tremonton,
(gststic.com image)
Thursday, 12 October 2017
UFO Article (Blog):
“The Newhouse Utah Movie - Part Two”
By
Kevin D. Randle, 24 December 2013
(A
Different Perspective, Cedar Rapids ,
Iowa )
Delbert
C. Newhouse, a U.S. Navy Warrant Officer and Chief Photographer, filmed several
manoeuvring UFOs over Tremonton ,
Utah , on 2 July 1952, at 11:00
a.m.
Quote
from the article:
“Well,
as I have said, repeatedly, nothing is simple in the world of the UFO. Skeptics
have made a big deal out of a letter written by Dr. James McDonald in which he
quotes from his 1970 interview with Delbert Newhouse that he, Newhouse, was ‘…positive
they had cut the first 10 or 20
feet [of the film], which were shot when the objects
were very much closer…’ There was also discussion by Newhouse that he had not
received the original film back and that seems to be borne out by various
letters and memos contained in the Project Blue Book files.
However,
this does seem to strengthen, to a degree, Newhouse’s statements to McDonald
some twenty (or 18) years after the fact. He said the film was altered, he said
that frames were missing, and he was correct about both those things.”
The fact that the U.S. Air Force tampered with both the 1950 Nicholas Mariana film and the 1952 film recorded by Delbert C. Newhouse – seems to point towards that the U.S. Air Force or anotherU.S.
government agency/group collects and keeps the best UFO evidence.
http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-newhouse-utan-movie-part-two.html
The fact that the U.S. Air Force tampered with both the 1950 Nicholas Mariana film and the 1952 film recorded by Delbert C. Newhouse – seems to point towards that the U.S. Air Force or another
http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-newhouse-utan-movie-part-two.html
Related
posts:
Freeze-frame from the 2 July 1952 Tremonton, Utah , UFO film
(gststic.com image)
Friday, 3 July 2009
UFO Films:
Official U.S. Air Force & Navy Examination of the
Great Falls (Montana) and Tremonton (Utah) UFO Films
The Great Falls and Tremonton UFO films were recorded on
15 August 1950 and 2 July 1952, respectively.
This video shows the U.S. Military's official analyses of these famous UFO films:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9x7mp1uYf8
NOTE: I also posted reports on 24 February 2009 and 20 April 2009 pertaining to these UFO films.
NICAP.org article: 'The Nicholas Mariana UFO Color Film,
Great Falls, Montana':
http://www.nicap.org/montanadir.htm
NICAP.org article: 'The Tremonton, Utah UFO Color Film'
(by U.S. Navy Warrant Officer Delbert C. Newhouse):
http://www.nicap.org/utahdir.htm
Freeze-frame from
the Great Falls UFO film
Freeze-frame from
the Tremonton UFO film
Official U.S. Air Force & Navy Examination of the
Great Falls (Montana) and Tremonton (Utah) UFO Films
The Great Falls and Tremonton UFO films were recorded on
15 August 1950 and 2 July 1952, respectively.
This video shows the U.S. Military's official analyses of these famous UFO films:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9x7mp1uYf8
NOTE: I also posted reports on 24 February 2009 and 20 April 2009 pertaining to these UFO films.
NICAP.org article: 'The Nicholas Mariana UFO Color Film,
Great Falls, Montana':
http://www.nicap.org/montanadir.htm
NICAP.org article: 'The Tremonton, Utah UFO Color Film'
(by U.S. Navy Warrant Officer Delbert C. Newhouse):
http://www.nicap.org/utahdir.htm
the Great Falls UFO film
the Tremonton UFO film
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
