
Wednesday, 26 February 2020
UFO News Article (College Newspaper):
“UFO: In 1966, Hillsdale had
its own close encounter”
19 March 2015
(The Hillsdale Collegian, Hillsdale ,
Michigan )
NICAP.org UFO case
report (see below link):
“Brad Sparks:
March 21, 1966. Hillsdale , Michigan (BBU)
10:32, 11 p.m.-4:30 a.m.
17 Hillsdale College students including Barbara Kohn [Cole?] and Cynthia
Poffenberger saw a football-shaped object with red-green-white pulsating lights
descend from the NE pass close to their dorm then disappear to the S as if
crashing to the ground, then return at 11 p.m. William Van Horn, Civil Defense
Director and rated commercial pilot, and police arrived and conducted a ground
search 1/2 to 2 miles away to the E but found nothing until Van Horn
reached the college dorm where he, using binoculars, and [87?] students saw a
maneuvering lighted 20-25 ft object on or near the ground about 1,500-1,700
ft away to the E, with a dirty-white light on the left and dim orange on the
right, which brightened after 10 mins to white and red and began to rise at a
rate of 25-30 ft/min to a height of 100-150 ft (about 3-6 mins), stopped momentarily
then descended and repeated the motion several times. At one point on a descent
a ‘convexed’ surface (between?) the lights could be seen. Radiation was later
detected at the landing area about 330 to 600 microroentgens/hr
[milliroentgens/hr ?], roughly 10-60x background level, and possible boron
contamination. (Sparks ;
Vallée Magonia 732; Todd Lemire; etc.)”
Wikipedia article: “Hillsdale
College ”:
Wikipedia article: “Hillsdale ,
Michigan ”:

William Van Horn, Civil
Defense Director, Hillsdale , Michigan ,
measures radioactivity
at a 1966 Michigan UFO landing site
(“UFO: Friend, Foe Or
Fantasy?” (CBS, New York City , New York ) image)
Delp Hall and the Liberty Walk, facing Central Hall
[Hillsdale College , Hillsdale , Michigan ]
(tageo.com photo)
Tuesday, 25 February 2020
UFO News Article:
“Civil Defense’s UFO Probe
Explained By Its Director”
14 October 1966
(The Hillsdale Daily News, Michigan )
Source: NewspaperArchive.com
The whole article:
“ ‘It is dangerous to the welfare of the nation for our government to
try to ridicule and harass people. This was what was done during the local UFO
excitement earlier in the year. I believe we have made our point. The University of Colorado now has been assigned to look
more thoroughly into the handling of UFO sightings. I don’t think we’ll have
any more brushoffs based on the swamp gas contention.’
Willian (Bud) Van Horn, Hillsdale
County civil defense
director, concluded his talk before the Rotary Club Thursday with this
statement.
For 35 minutes he traced the efforts of himself and his colleagues to
handle the UFO (Unidentified Flying Objects) reports received at his office
since last March and to keep the community from being ridiculed.
He was especially vehement in his criticism of Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Northwestern University
scientist who made a cursory study here after the Hillsdale College
coed sightings on March 21 made headlines throughout the nation.
Since last March there have been at least two other UFO incidents worthy
of note by the local CD office, Mr. Van Horn said.
*
* *
One was from a woman who heard her dog barking at night. She told the CD
office that she looked out in time to see a vehicle settling in a field.
Four women in the North Adams-Jerome region had an object orbit their
car. It apparently had an effect on the vehicle because the driver put the car
into second gear and pressed the accelerator to the floorboard, yet could
develop a speed of only 20
miles an hour. The four ran to a nearby house occupied
by five persons. All nine looked out to see a vehicle hovering around the barn.
Mr. Van Horn said his Civil Defense organization made extensive investigations
of all reports both during and since March. He told about finding radioactivity
in places where UFO’s had been reported, of pure boron found in water, of blips
on Air Force radar screens (later denied by the AF) and of unusual metal
shavings found in a field less than a month ago.
Mr. Van Horn said the government has no business trying to keep people
quiet about UFO sightings. He said that the 24-page report he issued to
disprove Dr. Hynek’s swamp gas claims has never been rebutted by the Air Force
or Dr. Hynek.
A different attitude on the part of the government is now indicated, the
speaker said. The investigative work done here by the local CD has helped to
bring this about, Mr. Van Horn feels.”
My comment:
This is a very interesting article about some of the 1966 UFO sightings
in the Hillsdale, Michigan ,
area (South East Michigan). The article, among other things, discusses UFO
cases that involve animal reaction (dog)/UFO landing, electromagnetic (EM) interference
with a car engine and radioactivity.
Wikipedia article: “Hillsdale
College ”:
Wikipedia article: “Hillsdale ,
Michigan ”:

William Van Horn, Civil
Defense Director, Hillsdale , Michigan ,
measures radioactivity
at a 1966 Michigan UFO landing site
(“UFO: Friend, Foe Or
Fantasy?” (CBS, New York City , New York ) image)
Delp
Hall and the Liberty Walk, facing Central Hall
[Hillsdale College ,
Hillsdale , Michigan ]
(tageo.com photo)
UFO Case Directory (Distant Encounters) (E-mail): “Subject: March 20, 1952, Centreville, Maryland.”
6 October 2005
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Source: Ruppelt, Report on Unidentified Flying Objects, 135-136
The report below sounds very similar to the March 20, 1952 sighting at Centerville , Maryland ,
by A.D. Hutchison of the CIA. This object took a vertical ‘jump’.
While I’d been in California , Colonel Dunn had received a call from General Samford’s office. It seems that a
few nights before, one of the top people in the Central Intelligence Agency was
having a lawn party at his home just outside Alexandria , Virginia .
A number of notable personages were in attendance and they had seen a flying
saucer. The report had been passed down to Air Force intelligence, and due to
the quality of the brass involved, it was ‘suggested’ that I get to Washington on the double
and talk to the host of the party. I was at his office before 5:00 P.M. and got
his report.
About ten o’clock in the evening he and two other people were standing
near the edge of his yard talking; he happened to be facing south, looking off
across the countryside. He digressed a bit from his story to explain that his
home is on a hilltop in the country, and when looking south, he had a view of
the entire countryside. While he was talking to the two other people he noticed
a light. He had assumed it was an airplane and had casually watched it, but
when the light got fairly close, the CIA man said that he suddenly realized
there wasn’t any sound associated with it. If it were an airplane it would have
been close enough for him to hear even above the hum of the guests’
conversations. He had actually quit talking and was looking at the light when
it stopped for an instant and began to climb almost vertically. He said
something to the other guests, and they looked up just in time to see the light
finish its climb, stop, and level out. They all watched it travel level for a
few seconds, then go into a nearly vertical dive, level out, and streak off to
the east.
Most everyone at the party had seen the light before it disappeared, and
within minutes several friendly arguments as to what it was had developed, I
was told. One person thought it was a lighted balloon, and a retired general
thought it was an airplane. To settle the arguments, they had made a few
telephone calls. I might add that these people were such that the mention of
their names on a telephone got quick results. Radar in the Washington
area said that there had been no airplanes flying west to east south of Alexandria in the past
hour. The weather station at Bolling AFB said that there were no balloons in
the area, but as a double check the weather people looked at their records of
high altitude winds. It couldn’t have been a balloon because none of the winds
up to 65,000 feet
were blowing from west to east – and to be able to see a light on a balloon, it
has to be well below 65,000
feet ; the man from CIA told me that they had even
considered the possibility that the UFO was a meteor and that the had been due
to some kind of an atmospheric distortion. But the light had been in sight too
long to be a meteor. He added that an army chaplain and two teetotaler guests
had also seen the light jump.
There wasn’t much left for me to do when I finished talking to the man.
He and his guests had already made all of the checks that I’d have made. All I
could do was go back to Dayton ,
write up his report, and stamp it ‘Unknown.’ ”
Project Blue Book listed the case [BBU 1074] as “Unknown.”
Project Blue Book listed the case [BBU 1074] as “Unknown.”
Related posts:
(tageo.com photo)
Monday, 24 February 2020
U.S. Government UFO Document:
“SUBJECT: Report of Unusual Flying Object”
23 February 1952
(Project Blue Book , U.S. Air Force, Washington , D.C. )
Source: NICAP.org
The whole document (not written in U.S. Department of Defense document
format):
“TO: DCS/Intelligence
Headquarters Tactical Air
Command
Captain George P. Arns, Hq 47th
Bomb Wing, and I were flying a
T-11 aircraft, number 41-27496
from Cleveland ,
Ohio to Langley
Air Force Base, Virginia ,
11 Feb 51, when an unusual flying object
was sighted nearPittsburgh ,
Pennsylvania .
was sighted near
A cold front cloud buildup had been encountered southeast of Pittsburgh that could not
be topped or penetrated so we changed our flight plan to land at Greater
Pittsburgh Airport.
As we approached Pittsburgh from the South at approximately 5,000 feet , a brilliant
lighted object was seen high to the right (1 o’clock high), flying a reciprocal
course (approx South) to ours. This sighting occurred between 0300 and 0315
EST. At first we thought an aircraft was on fire because of the brilliance and
comet-like appearance and yellow to orange flame coloration of the object.
However, as the object approached a 3 o’clock high position, regular, one to
two pulsations of the [flame] was noted, which continued
until the object passed out of sight. Both of us thought it was a jet because
of the speed, however, neither of us have ever seen a pulsating flame emitted
from a jet at night. The sighting reminded me of buzz-bombs that I had seen
many times in Belgium
during the last war. However, the buzz-bomb flame was only a fraction of the size, and was continuous.
The object definitely was in excess of five (5) miles from our position. This
estimate was based on the location of the cloud buildup on our right several
miles, over which the object flew and disappeared from sight. The cloud buildup
was between 12,000 and 15,000
feet high (estimate).
The sky was clear and well illuminated by a bright
moon above the clouds, affording continuous unobstructed observation of the
object for approximately one minute prior to disappearing from sight.
We landed at Pittsburgh
at 0330 hours.
Captain [Arns] is not available to sign this statement
because he is presently on leave.
RICHARD J. GEDEON
Major, USAF
Doctrine Directorate”
Project Blue Book listed the case as “Unknown.”
Related posts:
(ufocasebook.com
image)
(tageo.com photo)
UFO Case Directory
(SIGHTINGS FROM AIRCRAFT):
“AT-11 Encounters Object
Feb. 11, 1952
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania”
The whole UFO case report:
“3:00 a.m.
EST
Duration 1 min AT-11 aircraft |
Military
2 observers No EMI No radar contact |
Brad Sparks:
Feb. 11, 1952; Pittsburgh ,
Penna. (BBU 1052)
Dan Wilson:
Feb. 11, 1952; Pittsburgh ,
Penna. (BBU 1052)
NICAP.org presents U.S.
government (Project Blue Book, U.S. Air Force) documents that pertain to the
UFO case.
Wikipedia article: “Beechcraft Model 18”:
Related posts:
A Beech 18 at Little Gransden 2019 (text by Wikipedia)
(wikimedia.org)
(wikimedia.org photo)
(tageo.com photo)
Sunday, 23 February 2020
UFO Footage:
UFO Filmed During Recording
of the Movie, “Arlington Road”
Source: TVUFOFootage (YouTube channel)
This daytime footage seemingly shows a self-luminous, oval shaped
object.
The unknown object does not resemble any known conventional aircraft.
The film was released on 9 July 1999 (U.S. ).
Filming location: Houston ,
Texas .
I also reported about this UFO footage on 2 September 2009. This video
has since been removed from YouTube.
(Zoomed video)
UFO Forum Thread:
“UFO Sighting during the movie ‘Arlington Road ’ ”
By Mario Maisto, 1 September 2009
(AboveTopSecret.com ,
U.S.A. )
(
(Sony Pictures Entertainment/youtube.com image)
UFO Paper (Unpublished Manuscript):
“A STUDY OF SECONDARY EFFECTS”
By Andrew Schopick, Summer 1966
Source: J. Allen Hynek Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS.org), Chicago , Illinois
Quote from the paper:
“Introduction
Quote from the paper:
“Introduction
My sole purpose in writing this paper is to report and document, as
thoroughly and as accurately as possible, the existence of a specific group of
UFO reports known as the ‘E-M’ cases. There are literally dozens of instances
where the presence of an unidentified flying object coincided with disturbances
or complete disruption in the normal operation of various electrical equipment.
If some correlation really exists
between the presence of a UFO and unusual interference with operating
electrical equipment, it would be extremely significant. Many UFO enthusiasts
along with such prominent UFO investigating organizations as the Aerial
Phenomena Research Organization in Tucson ,
Arizona and the National
Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena in Washington, D. C., believe that
some type of electro-magnetic (E-M) effect from UFOs causes the interference in
electrical apparatus as recorded in a number of UFO reports. The stalling of
automobiles, the [dying] out of headlights,
and interference with radio and TV equipment are examples of these so called E-M
effects associated with the presence of a UFO.”
Related posts:
(wikimedia.org image)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


