Showing posts sorted by date for query 1952 Tremonton, Utah. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query 1952 Tremonton, Utah. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, 17 November 2019

UFO Documentary Film Segment:
“Video Evidence Of UFO Activity
Dismissed By Government |
UFOs: The Lost Evidence”


Published: 8 October 2019
(Discovery, Inc., New York City, New York)

Source: Discovery UK (YouTube channel)

A large part of this documentary segment reports on the 1952 UFO film of Delbert C. Newhouse, a U.S. Navy Warrant Officer and Chief Photographer.

Quote from NICAP.org’s web page, “The Tremonton, Utah / Newhouse Color Film – July 2, 1952 – Tremonton, Utah
(UFO case directory (IMCAT)):
Fran Ridge:
July 2, 1952; Tremonton, Utah (BBU)
11:10 a.m. Navy photographer Delbert C. Newhouse and his wife, while driving across the state, saw a group of 12-14 shiny silver objects milling around in the sky. Newhouse stopped and retrieved his 16 mm camera and filmed extensive footage of the objects. He and his wife both reported seeing some of the objects relatively close-up and they were shaped like one plate inverted atop another. When the film was returned to Newhouse following Navy and Air Force analysis, the frames showing the discs close-up had been deleted. What Newhouse and his wife saw BEFORE he was able to get the camera out and running, reportedly, were structured objects, described as ‘gunmetal-colored objects shaped like two saucers, one inverted on top of the other.’ (*) The Air Force and the Navy, considering Newhouse’s credibility, spent considerable time and money on the analyses and to classify the Utah Film as ‘Secret’.  Also noted by the analysts was the absence of any evidence to indicate birds such as fluttering. Air Force & Navy analysis: ‘Birds and balloons immediately eliminated, within a five mile radius, aircraft could have easily been determined. In excess of five miles the objects were moving faster than aircraft could achieve, except in straightline speed runs.’ And, surprisingly, an FBI letter documents the importance placed on this incident. **

Update 17 Nov. 2013
Fran Ridge:
Several years ago I had a taped telephone interview with Newhouse and he stuck to his story throughout. At the very least this was a good daylight sighting with two witnesses (one very reputable) and good motion picture footage that neither the Air Force, nor the Navy, nor others could logically explain. The tape was lost went my basement flooded. My last contact with him was a letter dated May 29, 2005. *** Newhouse passed away August 11, 2006 in Portland, Oregon.”

I also reported about this UFO case directory on 2 October 2019.


Wikipedia article: “Discovery, Inc.”:





Freeze-frame of the 2 July 1952 Tremonton, Utah, UFOs
(filmed by Delbert C. Newhouse, Warrant Officer and
Chief Photographer, U.S. Navy (gststic.com image)















Delbert C. Newhouse (left)
(googleusercontent.com image)

Sunday, 6 October 2019

U.S. Government UFO Document:
“Subj: Interpretation of Movies of
Unidentified Objects; progress report on”


4 May 1953
(U.S. Naval Photographic Interpretation Center,
U.S. Naval Receiving Station, Washington, D.C.)

Source: NICAP.org

The document pertains to the 2 July 1952 Tremonton, Utah,
and 15 August 1950 Great FallsMontana, UFO films (filmed by
Warrant Officer and Chief Photographer Delbert C. Newhouse,
U.S. Navy, and Nicholas Mariana, a civilian, respectively).

Quote from the document (not written in U.S. Department of Defense document format) (Page 15):
    “1. … It is the majority opinion of the group conducting this analysis that these images are light sources. This will explain the non-blinking and variations in luminosity – but not the velocity or acceleration factors. In either case, light source or reflective surface, it appears as if the objects are of a nature which we are not able to identify in terms of natural phenomena or commonly known man-made objects.

     2. There is no indication of what kind of objects could have caused the images except that they must be of a construction, design, and material not commonly known. This is indicated by the computed acceleration rate and elocity [velocity] (answer 5). For the same reasons, birds, aircraft and balloons are ruled out.

     3. An analysis of the charts relative to movement indicate that there were group and individual movement. Within a group it appears as if the individual objects were moving counter-clock-wise along an elliptical or similar track. Thus when two objects crossed the camera line of sight they will appear to fuse into one. As they continued along their paths it will appear as if one object became two. This occurred at regular intervals at approximately every 25th frame as plotted in charts 5a and 5b.

     4. All objects appear to have the same characteristics in regards to shape, color, size and relative motion.

     5. The shape of the objects appears to be oblate or disk shaped, color; blue-white, and maximum and minimum size; 98 and 16 feet. The size is based on the assumption that the objects are five miles from the observer.

     6. Fade in and fade out of the objects were analyzed as in 3 above. In this case the group movement was such that the distance between the objects and camera was increased so that the objects could not be recorded on the film thereby causing the apparent fade-out. Fade-in as attributed to a shortening of the distance from the fade-out area to the camera station.

     7. Plots of the groups indicate that the objects move counter-clock-wise relative to the axis of flight path. However, nothing has been detected which indicates motion of the individual objects about their own axis although this motion appears to be likely.

     8. In determining the velocity of the objects three assumptions were made:

           a. The camera was held steady during Part III of the film.

           b. The objects were moving perpendicular to the optical axis, and

           c. The objects were five miles from the camera.

It is obvious that (b) is a fallacy; however, this assumption will give the minimum velocity and the actual velocity is greater than computed. The assumption that the objects are five miles from the camera is an arbitrary one. However, based on the emulsion speed and focal length, and object 50 feet in diameter and five miles from camera will be recorded on the film with sufficient resolution to identify major details of the object. It is felt that if these objects were closer than five miles at the time of recording, details would appear on the film.

Velocity is computed to be 3780 mph for a shift of 1 mm per frame if the object is five miles from the observer. From 55 measurements taken from Part III of the Utah film, the maximum and minimum velocities were 2457 and 378 mph respectively. These figures differ from those given in reference (c) and were computed from measurements obtained under more controlled conditions. Acceleration was determined from the formula: 

Since ‘g’ is equal to 32.17 ft/sec2 it was computed that:

Maximum acceleration = 21,168 mph/sec = 965 g
Minimum acceleration = 1,104 mph/sec = 50 g
Maximum deceleration = 32,448 mph/sec = 1479 g
Minimum deceleration = 272 mph/sec = 12 g

Velocity and acceleration determinations were also made from the Montana film. In this case, terrestrial objects appeared in the film and were held to as control. Subsequently, the velocity and acceleration determinations are considered to be more reliable. On the assumption of (b) and (c) above the maximum and minimum velocities of the left object are 1374 and 361 mph respectfully. For the right object they are 1117 and 189 mph. Accelerations were computed as:
                                                                      Left Object             Right Object
Maximum acceleration mph/sec   14,016 = 639 g     12640 = 576g
Minimum acceleration mph/sec                0 =     0 g                0 =      0g
Maximum deceleration mph/sec   13,184 = 601 g      14288 = 651g
Minimum deceleration mph/sec               0 =      0 g                0 =      0g

The above determinations were made from a total of 322 measurements. It was noted that the acceleration and determinations were in multiples of 12.5 approximately. This may be of significance although no study has been conducted to determine this.

     9. Velocity and acceleration were treated in sub-paragraph 8 above. Paragraph 2a indicates the controls used during this investigation.

     10. a. There is no recurring pattern in the relative position of the objects in formation. It appears however, as if the shift in relative positions were regular and that the original formation would be recovered if the continuing action has been recorded.

          b. No. However, the same formation is maintained with objects changing positions.

          c. No detection of relative positions being maintained coincidental with movement about their axis.

          d. No detection of undulating motion of objects in phase either in formation or tumbling motion.

          e. There is evidence of abrupt changes in direction of flight path through fairly large angles.

          f. Certain objects do appear to remain motionless while other move about.

          g. Certain objects disappear while still well within the field of view. This is discussed in sub-paragraph 6 above.

4. Discussion.

During the study and investigation of the unidentified objects, the preliminary data uncovered were revealed to experts (with proper security clearance) in the fields of astronomy and physics. Although they presented certain natural phenomena theories to explain the cause of the objects under certain conditions they were not able to do so under the conditions during which the photography was taken, nor were they able to recognize these objects as man-made.

As to the results of the investigations being reported, no attempt was made to corroborate the opinions presented. Because of the lack of proper equipment, money and personnel, the investigation was limited. There are obvious tests which can be conducted to prove or disprove some of the findings presented. It is suggested that these be undertaken.

5. Reference (d) requests spectrophotometric analysis of the Utah film be made. Preliminary plan of test id underway.

L. W. KEITH [Officer in Charge]”

The document was sent to Director of Naval Intelligence.

NOTE: The document starts on Page 12. Numbers 1 to 10 in 
this text are sub-paragraphs. Numbers 4 (Discussion.) and 
5 (Reference …) are paragraphs.


Wikipedia article: “Office of Naval Intelligence”:


Quote from the Wikipedia article:
“The Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) is the military intelligence agency of the United States Navy. Established in 1882 primarily to advance the Navy’s modernization efforts,[4][5] ONI is the oldest member of the United States Intelligence Community and serves as the nation’s premier source of maritime intelligence. Since the First World War, its mission has broadened to include real-time reporting on the developments and activities of foreign navies; protecting maritime resources and interests; monitoring and countering transnational maritime threats; providing technical, operational, and tactical support to the U.S. Navy and its partners; and surveying the global maritime environment. ONI employs over 3,000 military and civilian personnel worldwide and is headquartered at the National Maritime Intelligence Center in Suitland, Maryland.”












(wikimedia.org image)












Freeze-frame of the 2 July 1952 Tremonton, Utah, UFOs
(filmed by Delbert C. Newhouse, Warrant Officer and
Chief Photographer, U.S. Navy) (gststic.com image)














Satellite photo of Tremonton, Utah (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)







Film freeze-frame of the 15 August 1950 Great FallsMontana, UFOs (filmed by Nicholas Mariana) (ufocasebook.com image)












Satellite photo of Great Falls, Montana (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

Wednesday, 2 October 2019

UFO Case Directory (IMCAT):
“The Tremonton, Utah / Newhouse Color Film
July 2, 1952
Tremonton, Utah”


(NICAP.org)

The whole UFO case report:
Fran Ridge:
July 2, 1952; Tremonton, Utah (BBU)
11:10 a.m. Navy photographer Delbert C. Newhouse and his wife, while driving across the state, saw a group of 12-14 shiny silver objects milling around in the sky. Newhouse stopped and retrieved his 16 mm camera and filmed extensive footage of the objects. He and his wife both reported seeing some of the objects relatively close-up and they were shaped like one plate inverted atop another. When the film was returned to Newhouse following Navy and Air Force analysis, the frames showing the discs close-up had been deleted. What Newhouse and his wife saw BEFORE he was able to get the camera out and running, reportedly, were structured objects, described as ‘gunmetal-colored objects shaped like two saucers, one inverted on top of the other.’ (*) The Air Force and the Navy, considering Newhouse’s credibility, spent considerable time and money on the analyses and to classify the Utah Film as ‘Secret’.  Also noted by the analysts was the absence of any evidence to indicate birds such as fluttering. Air Force & Navy analysis: ‘Birds and balloons immediately eliminated, within a five mile radius, aircraft could have easily been determined. In excess of five miles the objects were moving faster than aircraft could achieve, except in straightline speed runs.’ And, surprisingly, an FBI letter documents the importance placed on this incident. **

Update 17 Nov. 2013
Fran Ridge:
Several years ago I had a taped telephone interview with Newhouse and he stuck to his story throughout. At the very least this was a good daylight sighting with two witnesses (one very reputable) and good motion picture footage that neither the Air Force, nor the Navy, nor others could logically explain. The tape was lost went my basement flooded. My last contact with him was a letter dated May 29, 2005. *** Newhouse passed away August 11, 2006 in Portland, Oregon.”












Freeze-frame of the 2 July 1952 Tremonton, Utah, UFOs
(filmed by Delbert C. Newhouse, Warrant Officer and
Chief Photographer, U.S. Navy) (gststic.com image)


















Satellite photo of Tremonton, Utah (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

Thursday, 12 October 2017

UFO Article (Blog):
“The Newhouse Utah Movie - Part Two”


By Kevin D. Randle, 24 December 2013
(A Different Perspective, Cedar Rapids, Iowa)

Delbert C. Newhouse, a U.S. Navy Warrant Officer and Chief Photographer, filmed several manoeuvring UFOs over Tremonton, Utah, on 2 July 1952, at 11:00 a.m.

Quote from the article:
“Well, as I have said, repeatedly, nothing is simple in the world of the UFO. Skeptics have made a big deal out of a letter written by Dr. James McDonald in which he quotes from his 1970 interview with Delbert Newhouse that he, Newhouse, was ‘…positive they had cut the first 10 or 20 feet [of the film], which were shot when the objects were very much closer…’ There was also discussion by Newhouse that he had not received the original film back and that seems to be borne out by various letters and memos contained in the Project Blue Book files.

However, this does seem to strengthen, to a degree, Newhouse’s statements to McDonald some twenty (or 18) years after the fact. He said the film was altered, he said that frames were missing, and he was correct about both those things.”

The fact that the U.S. Air Force tampered with both the 1950 Nicholas Mariana film and the 1952 film recorded by Delbert C. Newhouse – seems to point towards that the U.S. Air Force or another U.S. government agency/group collects and keeps the best UFO evidence.

http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-newhouse-utan-movie-part-two.html

Related posts:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Delbert+C.+Newhouse









Freeze-frame from the 2 July 1952 Tremonton, Utah, UFO film
(gststic.com image)

Saturday, 17 December 2016

UFO Journal Article:
“ON THE UFOS”


December 1967
(Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Chicago, Illinois)

Source: Google Books

Quote from the article:
“Dr. (Carl) Sagan claims that the Central Intelligence Agency Robertson Panel, which met in 1953, concluded after a thorough study that UFOs, ‘all were probably natural phenomena wrongly interpreted.’ This claim simplifies the work of the panel to the point of distortion.”

The official name of the Robertson Panel was Scientific Advisory Panel on Unidentified Flying Objects.

The Bulletin article also mentions the 2 July 1952 Tremonton, Utah, UFO film (filmed by U.S. Navy Warrant Officer Delbert C. Newhouse).

The article is found on Page 40 (click on the “Front Cover” button to find the article).

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists was founded by former Manhattan Project physicists in 1945.


Wikipedia article: “Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists”:


Related posts:


realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Tremonton,+Utah











Freeze-frame from the 2 July 1952 Tremonton, Utah, UFO film
(gststic.com image)

Thursday, 10 November 2016

Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO Films/Videos (Footage)


Website: National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP.org):

(Search term: “Film”)

(“Films”)

(“Filmed”)

(“Filming”)

(“Motion Picture”)

(“Motion Pictures”)

(“Video”)

(“Videos”)

(“Videotape”)

(“Videotapes”)

(“Videotaped”)

(“Videotaping”)

(“Footage”)








Film freeze-frame of the 15 August 1950 Great FallsMontana, UFOs (filmed by Nicholas Mariana) (ufocasebook.com image)








Freeze-frame from the 2 July 1952 Tremonton, Utah, UFO film
(gststic.com image)

Saturday, 30 November 2013

UFO News Article (Blog):
“Ditch the report and just say ‘aircraft’ ”


By Billy Cox, 27 November 2013
(De Void, Sarasota Herald-Tribune, Florida)

Billy Cox presents an interview with former White Sands Missile Range systems analyst and New Mexico State University astronomer Jimmie Robinson:


Robinson sighted the same UFOs (or similar UFOs) which U.S. Navy Warrant Officer and Chief Photographer Delbert C. Newhouse filmed over Tremonton, Utah, on 2 July 1952.

In this interview, Robinson claims to have witnessed a second daylight UFO incident (1 round UFO which approached a U.S. Air Force B-36 airplane) over Tucson, Arizona, in 1952.





















Satellite photo of Tucson, Arizona (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)