By Dr. Michael D. Swords, 8 December 2009
Sunday, 8 November 2015
UFO Article (Blog):
“UFOs?...Uhhh,They're BALLOONS!!
Yep. That's What they Are.”
By Dr. Michael D. Swords, 8 December 2009
(The Big Study)
Quote from the article:
“This blog entry is about the title [UFOs and
Balloons] but it is mainly about the critical importance of learning
UFO/Government history. The only reason that certain falsities about the
subject are allowed to go on interminably is that no one really knows anything
about what really went on. Many good people keep disrespecting the subject because
they cannot believe that ‘science’ and the Air Force would have so thoroughly
lied and/or otherwise misinformed them through all these years. This little
entry is part of one ‘chapter’ in how all that could happen.
The villain in the story is a scientist working for
the U S Navy's Office of Naval Research. His name was Urner Liddel; he was very
smart; he knew all the science big-wigs personally [like Edward Condon, a
friend]; and he was in charge of the nuclear science desk at ONR.
The ‘Big Research Balloon’ theory had remarkable
staying power despite its absurdity. Three years after Liddel's ‘revelations’
[in 1954] it had a particularly big year with major national media outlets
resurrecting and parading it about to the relief, one supposes, of both the Air
Force and the more hysterical-oriented part of the American public. Two of the
sources shown on the left are Collier's magazine and U.S.News and World Report,
showing the kind of coverage such a debunking claim could command. The
newspaper story is even more interesting to the UFO historian, as it quotes the
CEO in charge of secret balloon research at General Mills as saying that their
balloons are responsible for the UFO craze. Certainly this is as close to the ‘horse’s
mouth’ as you can get and so it must be true. But NONE of it was true and all
the important ‘authority figures’ had to know it.
Unlike Liddel and even Bullis, it was the boys at the
left who actually flew the secret balloons. What did they say? THEY ALL SAW
UFOS. Not their own balloons, but UFOs coming to ‘visit’ or ‘inspect’ or ‘whatever
they were doing’ at their balloon launches. Commander McLaughlin, who headed up
the Navy projects out of White Sands Proving Grounds, saw a UFO and had others
reported to him. One such case was by Charles Moore, the scientific leader on
the site. Most astounding were the experiences of J.J. Kaliszewski and his launch
teams at General Mills in Minnesota. We are lucky that Tom Tulien interviewed
Kaliszewski for the UFO Oral History Project. Here are some quotes: After
saying that he and his buddies just laughed at Liddel’s article when it came
out, he told Tom this: ‘[In 1951] we were up there watching the balloon for
possible malfunction, when all of a sudden into our field of vision comes this
object--had no business being there--so this is what we reported. Oh, it passed
behind the balloon, over the balloon, oh, it moved around. It had to have some
interest in the balloon or it wouldn't have hung around.’ A day later it
happened again.”
Wikipedia article: “White Sands
Missile Range ”:
Related posts:
Map of White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico
(wikimedia.org image)
UFO Article (Blog):
“Military-UFO Encounters”
By Dr. Michael D. Swords, 6 September 2009
(The Big Study)
Quote from the article:
“People would probably be surprised to find out how
many unexplainable military-UFO encounters there have been. Many dozens of them
have been formally recorded and there are certainly hundreds more. The reason
that we know that latter fact is that a large number of retired servicemen have
told us. The picture at the right represents something that is unusual in a
whole variety of ways. It's meant to visualize an event that occurred at a New
Mexican aerial location, wherein the base [Kirtland] had a plane up which was
ordered to intercept an unknown object. The pilot did so, according to his
report, and then got carried away and fired on the UFO--a definite No-No unless
the intruder is clearly perceived to be a threat and the use of weapons does
not unduly risk anyone or anything of the citizenry. The pilot landed and gave
his report which was written up. This was not sent up the line to higher
authorities because of the poor judgement of the pilot involved. However, when
the base intelligence officer was visited by the chief officer of the Air Force's
UFO project, Edward Ruppelt of Project Blue Book, he told Ruppelt of the 1952
incident and showed him the file. Ruppelt was stunned by the pilot's behavior,
let alone the case, and published it [with the pilot's name left anonymous] in
his book The Report On Unidentified
Flying Objects.”
2006 US Geological Survey photo
of Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico (wikimedia.org) (wikimedia.org photo)
Saturday, 7 November 2015
Google/YouTube Website Searches:
Focus On the UK Ministry of Defence UFO Files
Website: webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk:
(Videos)
Website: The National Archives UK (YouTube channel):
Website: The National Archives UK (YouTube channel):
(itv.com photo)
Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO Incidents/Research/Projects Involving (Mainly) the U.S. Government,
U.S. Military and U.S. Intelligence Community
Website: The Big Study (thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com)
The blog is run by the U.S. chemist, biochemist and UFO
researcher Michael D. Swords, Ph.D.
(“U.S. Government”)
(Government)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Atomic+Energy+Commission”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Atomic+Energy+Commission”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“Atomic Energy Commission”)
(Nuclear)
(“Freedom of Information Act” (FOIA))
(“UK Government”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Department+of+Defense”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“Department of Defense”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Department+of+Defense”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“Department of Defense”)
(Defense)
(“U.S. Military”)
(“Defense Intelligence Agency”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=D.I.A.+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=D.I.A.+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(D.I.A.)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Continental+Air+Command”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“Air Defense Command”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=NORAD+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command))
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Continental+Air+Command”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“Continental Air Command” (CONAC))
(“Strategic Air Command” (SAC))
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=SAC+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=SAC+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(SAC)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=NORAD+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command))
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=NATO+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization))
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Canadian+Military”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“Canadian Military”)
(“British Military”)
(“U.S. Army”)
(Army)
(“Army Base”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Missile+Range”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Missile+Range”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“Missile Range”)
(Missile)
(“U.S. Navy”)
(U.S.N.)
(Navy)
(“Office of Naval” (Research/Intelligence))
(“Submarine Base”)
(“Army Air Force”)
(“U.S. Air Force”)
(U.S.A.F.)
(“Air Force”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Project+SIGN”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“Air Force Base”)
(“Air Base”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Project+SIGN”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“Project SIGN”)
(“Project Grudge”)
(“Project Blue Book”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=Wright-Patterson+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=Wright-Patterson+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(Wright-Patterson (Air Force Base) (Project Blue Book))
(“Colorado Project”)
(“Condon Project”)
(“Robertson Panel”)
(“U.S. Coast Guard”)
(“Coast Guard”)
(“Coast Guard Station”)
(“U.S. Intelligence”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Intelligence+Community”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Intelligence+Community”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“Intelligence Community”)
(Intelligence)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“UK+Intelligence”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“UK Intelligence”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“UK+Intelligence”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“UK Intelligence”)
(“Homeland Security”)
(C.I.A.)
(“Federal Bureau of Investigation”)
(F.B.I.)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“National+Security+Agency”+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(“National Security Agency”)
(N.S.A.)
(“National Reconnaissance Office”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=NACA+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(wikimedia.org image)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=NACA+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics))
(NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration))
(“Police Department”)
(Police)
(“Sheriff’s Department”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=Sheriff+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=Sheriff+site:thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com
(Sheriff)
(“Law Enforcement”)
(wikimedia.org image)
(wikimedia.org image)
UFO Article (Blog):
“Peru: Airliner Passenger Photographs UFO”
24 June 2010
(Inexplicata.blogspot.com)
(Inexplicata.blogspot.com)
The UFO was photographed (by a renowned attorney)
during a TACA flight from Lima to Piura (Peru) on 18 June 2010, at around 3:00
p.m.:
http://inexplicata.blogspot.no/2010/06/peru-airliner-passenger-photographs-ufo.html
The UFO sighting was corroborated by fellow passengers, according to Inexplicata.
The UFO sighting was corroborated by fellow passengers, according to Inexplicata.
(Con Nuestro Perú photo)
Thursday, 5 November 2015
Google Searches:
Focus On UFOs In Peru
(Peru government websites) (Search term: OVNI)
(Peru government websites) (Search term: OVNIs)
(OVNI
DIFAA site:pe) (Web)
(OVNI
DIFAA) (Web)
(OVNI
DIFAA Perú site:pe) (Web)
(OVNI DIFAA Perú) (Web)
(DIFAA Peru) (Web)
(UFO DIFAA Peru) (Web)
(UFO DIFAA Peru site:com) (Web)
(UFO
DIFAA Peru site:org) (Web)
(UFO DIFAA Peru site:net) (Web)
(UFO DIFAA Peru site:info) (Web)
(OVNIs Perú Gobierno (Government)) (Web)
(OVNIs Perú Militares (Military)) (Web)
(OVNIs Perú Fuerza Aérea (Air Force)) (Web)
(OVNIs Perú Gobierno) (Blogs)
(OVNIs Perú Militares) (Blogs)
(OVNIs Perú Fuerza Aérea) (Blogs)
(OVNIs En
Perú) (Web)
(OVNIs En
Perú site:pe) (Web)
(OVNI
site:pe) (Web)
(OVNIs En
Perú) (Blogs)
(Perú
OVNI Blogspot) (Blogs)
(OVNIs En
Perú site:pe) (Videos)
(OVNI Noticias Perú site:pe) (Web)
(OVNI Noticias Perú site:pe) (Videos)
(OVNI Programa TV Perú site:pe) (Videos)
(OVNI Programa TV Perú) (Videos)
(OVNI TV Perú) (Videos)
(UFO TV Peru) (Videos)
(UFOs In Peru) (Web)
(UFOs In Peru) (Blogs)
(UFOs In Peru) (Videos)
(Mutilacion Animal En Perú site:pe) (Web)
(Animal Mutilation In Peru) (Web)
(Peru site:inexplicata.blogspot.com)
(Peru Animal Mutilation site:inexplicata.blogspot.com)
(lib.utexas.edu image)
UFO News Article:
“Ministry of Defence covering up infamous UFO sightings which made 14 children draw similar pictures, claims Tory peer”
24 September 2015 (Daily Mirror,
London, UK)
Tory peer Lord Black
of Brentwood asks UK defence chiefs to reveal what happened in the skies
over Broad Haven (UK) in 1977, the Daily Mirror reports:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/science/ministry-defence-covering-up-infamous-6500940
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/science/ministry-defence-covering-up-infamous-6500940
(tageo.com photo)
Wednesday, 4 November 2015
UFO Video Report:
“RCMP Officer Interview – UFO Sighting 1978”
Source: James Blackwood – Raccoon Whisperer
(YouTube channel)
(YouTube channel)
RCMP Constable James Blackwood talks about his October
1978 UFO sighting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXmXIVOT4Fk
Blackwood and a dozen other locals observed a cylindrical shaped UFO which hovered between Clarenville (Newfoundland)and Random Island for approximately two hours.
Blackwood and a dozen other locals observed a cylindrical shaped UFO which hovered between Clarenville (Newfoundland)and Random Island for approximately two hours.
RCMP Constable James Blackwood
(youtube.com image)
Tuesday, 3 November 2015
UFO News Article:
“Retired RCMP officer remembers
Clarenville UFO experience”
29 October 2015
(The Packet, Clarenville, Canada)
(The Packet, Clarenville, Canada)
RCMP Constable James Blackwood and a dozen other
locals observed a cylindrical shaped UFO which hovered between Clarenville
(Newfoundland) and Random Island in October 1978, The Packet reports:
http://www.thepacket.ca/News/Local/2015-10-29/article-4324152/Retired-RCMP-officer-remembers%26nbsp%3B-Clarenville-UFO-experience/1
http://www.thepacket.ca/News/Local/2015-10-29/article-4324152/Retired-RCMP-officer-remembers%26nbsp%3B-Clarenville-UFO-experience/1
Satellite photo of Clarenville, Newfoundland and
Labrador,
UFO News Article (Blog):
“Rain, rain & more rain”
By Billy Cox, 27 October 2015
(De Void, Sarasota Herald-Tribune, Florida)
Billy Cox presents his fifth article on the 25 April
2013 Aguadilla (Puerto Rico) UFO video (filmed by a DHC-8 Turboprop under the command of U.S. Customs and Border Protection):
Quote from the article:
“Once it became clear CBP wasn’t going to bite, De
Void filed a Freedom of Information Act request for a government copy of that
video. It was apparently leaked to researchers by Customs insiders and had been
lighting up the Internet a year or so before the SCU issued its report. ‘It’s
not like they can deny it,’ says SCU co-author Robert Powell. “We’ve got radar
records showing their plane in the air at that time.” Still, it seemed
important to officially verify the provenance of the controversial clip. The
ensuing brushoff a couple of weeks ago, slugged ‘Final Disposition’ and tersely
worded as a ‘full denial based on exemptions,’ came as no surprise. But its
crimes against coherence were abominable.
‘CBP has determined,’ stated the online rejection notice, ‘that the responsive records are partially releasable, pursuant to Title 5 U.S.C 552 and have applied the appropriate exemptions.’ De Void followed that link to a list of nine itemized potential ‘Exemptions,’ accompanied by three other separate speedbumps beneath a category called ‘Exclusions.’ The range was eclectic; it covered everything from protecting ‘trade secrets’ to ‘unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.’ Unfortunately, the verdict failed to specify exactly which ‘Exemption’ or ‘Exclusion’ the CBP employed to justify its rejection of De Void’s FOIA. Furthermore, whatever the censors deemed ‘partially releasable’ is nowhere in sight.”
‘CBP has determined,’ stated the online rejection notice, ‘that the responsive records are partially releasable, pursuant to Title 5 U.S.C 552 and have applied the appropriate exemptions.’ De Void followed that link to a list of nine itemized potential ‘Exemptions,’ accompanied by three other separate speedbumps beneath a category called ‘Exclusions.’ The range was eclectic; it covered everything from protecting ‘trade secrets’ to ‘unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.’ Unfortunately, the verdict failed to specify exactly which ‘Exemption’ or ‘Exclusion’ the CBP employed to justify its rejection of De Void’s FOIA. Furthermore, whatever the censors deemed ‘partially releasable’ is nowhere in sight.”
(openminds.tv image)
UFO Report:
“The Case of the Missing Report:
Blue Book Unidentified: May 1, 1952, 9:10 A.M.,
Davis-Monthan AFB, Tucson, Arizona.”
By Dr. J. Allen Hynek
Source: NICAP.org
Quote from the report:
“This case is a classic. The late Dr. James McDonald made a valiant
attempt in get details from original witnesses after discovering that a major
report, submitted to Blue Book by the “UFO Officer” (who was one of the
witnesses!) at Davis-Monthan, was missing.
A small part of this was apparently recovered and now appears in the
Blue Book microfilms. The story is as follows:
An Air Intelligence Officer (who had as one of his
regular duties, the analysis of UFO cases reported to the local air base), a
B-36 crew, and an airman on the steps of the base hospital (just coming from
having his knee treated) all attested to this event. Two shiny round objects overtook a B-36,
slowed down to the speed of the B-36, stayed in formation with it for about 20
seconds, then executed a sharp no-radius 70-80-degree turn from the line of
flight of the B-36, and resumed original speed and went to about one-fourth the
distance to the horizon where one of the two objects made an immediate stop and
hovered. There was no sound other than
that of the B-36. There were no
contrails from either the objects or the B-36.
Despite the detailed description (in the original
report) of the maneuvers of the two shiny, silent objects, Blue Book dismissed
this case as ‘Aircraft.’ ”
Wikipedia.org article: “Davis–Monthan Air Force Base”:
Aircraft Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG)
boneyard at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base (text by Wikipedia) (wikimedia.org)
(wikimedia.org photo)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




