Showing posts sorted by relevance for query “Colorado Project”. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query “Colorado Project”. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, 11 October 2018

UFO Newsletter Article:
“AF Steps Up UFO Debunking”


U.F.O. Investigator, Vol. IV, No. 2, October 1967
(National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena, Washington, D.C.)

Source: CUFOS.org

The whole article:
“The highly-touted objective UFO investigation by the University of Colorado, sponsored by the U.S. Air Force, has brought no change in Air Force debunking practices. It was expected that the Air Force would declare a moratorium and adopt a wait-and-see attitude pending completion of the Colorado study. The actions can only increase public doubt about the outcome of the Air Force sponsored study which is, in effect, being pre-judged by the sponsor.

In the July/August issue of The Airman, ‘OfficiaI Magazine of the U.S. Air Force,’ Major George W. Ogles, Headquarters, USAF, dredged up all the standard debunking statements, including a hackneyed photograph of the Avrocar which has been used periodically to imply that UFOs might be U.S. secret craft. (In reality, the Avrocar project was unsuccessful and was scrapped years ago). Major Ogles incorrectly reported that there are no unexplained radar UFO sightings. When NICAP produced an Air Force letter admitting that a December 6, 1952, radar sighting was classified as unexplained, this case appeared in the next installment of the article as an exception to the rule. There are, of course hundreds of unexplained radar sightings. When these are cited to the Air Force, spokesmen either deny any knowledge of the cases or attribute them to errors by the radar operators.

In mid-August, the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) issued the misleading statement that no UFOs had been detected by their tracking system over the United States or Canada (NORAD computers automatically screen out radar targets such as UFOs which do not conform to known aircraft characteristics, because NORAD’s main mission is to detect possible enemy aircraft attacking the country). NORAD said that 95% of all sightings had been tracked down to the conventional source, an exaggeration which needs no further comment. Why the statement emanated from NORAD instead of Headquarters USAF as official regulations require is not known (AF Regulation 80-17; Section B, paragraph 4).

The widely disseminated annual Project Blue Book ‘fact sheet’,
1 March 1967, a standard hand-out to the press and the public, makes no mention whatsoever of the Colorado Project. Instead, Project Blue Book continues as before the Colorado contract to investigate sightings independently and to grind out counter-to-fact ‘explanations’ in many cases.

A sudden AF reversal after years of debunking was not expected. But if the Colorado study is objective, top Air Force officials should realize that their previous findings may have to be overhauled. They therefore support the neutrality and objectivity of the Colorado Project. Instead, the stepped-up debunking practices cause many people to suspect that the Air Force thinks it knows what Colorado’s conclusions will be. Even if the Project were nothing but a ‘hired’ whitewash job, however, it would seem wiser on the part of the Air Force to pretend objectivity until the conclusion is made public rather than to cast doubt in advance. NICAP does not believe that the Colorado Program will turn out to be a whitewash, but we do object strenuously to the use of such pressures by the Air Force to encourage a negative finding.”


Related posts:















(wikimedia.org image)

Wednesday, 6 July 2016

Google Searches/
Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFOs In Colorado


(Colorado Government/U.S. Government Websites)

(U.S. Military Websites)

(U.S. Educational Websites)

(All)

(All) (Search term: 2016)

(All) (site:com)

(All) (site:org)

(All) (site:net)

(All) (site:info)

(All) (site:tv)

(All) (Search term: Flying Saucers)

(All) (site:com) (Search term: Flying Saucers)

(All) (site:org) (Search term: Flying Saucers)

(All) (site:net) (Search term: Flying Saucers)

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=Flying+Saucers+Colorado+site:info
(All) (site:info) (Search term: Flying Saucers)

(All) (site:tv) (Search term: Flying Saucers)

(Google Blogs)

(Google Blogs) (Search term: Flying Saucers)

(WordPress Blogs)

(WordPress Blogs) (Search term: Flying Saucers)

(Search term: Animal Mutilation)

(Search term: Cattle Mutilation)
Website: Earthfiles (earthfiles.com):

(Search term: Animal Mutilation)

(Search term: Cattle Mutilation)

(UFO) (Videos)

Website: Google News Archive (news.google.com/newspapers):


(Search term: Flying Saucers)

Website: Fold3 (fold3.com) (Project Blue Book):


Website: Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) (mufon.com):


Website: J. Allen Hynek Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS) (cufos.org):


Website: PROJECT 1947 (project1947.com):


Website: National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP.org):


Website: National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC.org):


Website: UFO Casebook (ufocasebook.com):


Website: UFOINFO.com:


Website: UFO DNA (thecid.com/ufo):


Website: UFOS Northwest (ufosnw.com):


Website: Water UFO (waterufo.net):


Website: National Aviation Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena (NARCAP) (narcap.org):


Website: The UFO Chronicles (theufochronicles.com):


Website: Saturday Night Uforia (saturdaynightuforia.com):


Website: UFO UpDates (ufoupdateslist.com):


Website: Angelfire (angelfire.com):


Website: JTC UFO Database (Daniel Guenther, Germany)
(jtc-ufo.com/database/):


Website: Ignacio Darnaude Rojas-Marcos, Spain
(ignaciodarnaude.com):


Wikipedia article: “Colorado”:


City-Data.com: “Colorado Bigger Cities”:


Tageo.com: “Colorado”:

http://www.tageo.com/index-e-us-v-co.htm













Map of Colorado (lib.utexas.edu)
(lib.utexas.edu image)

Monday, 15 August 2016

UFO News Article:
“Doubts Rise as to Objectivity
Of ‘Flying Saucer’ Project”


1 May 1968
(Nashua Telegraph, New Hampshire)

Quote from the article:
“A final report of the scientists’ findings will be given to the National Academy of Sciences late in September. Condon, a physicist, said he would not discuss any conclusions that the researches might have reached.

Condon’s statement came amid controversy between him and Look Magazine over an article that calls the project the ‘Flying Saucer Fiasco.’

The university undertook a $500,000 study of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO’s) late in 1966 at the request of the Air Force, whose critics accused it of failing for two decades to make a comprehensive, scientific investigation of saucer reports from the public.

On the House floor Tuesday, Rep. J. Edward Roush, D-Ind., using phrases from the Look article, said Congress should take over the investigation from the Air Force. He said grave doubts had arisen ‘as to the scientific profundity and objectivity of the Colorado project.’

Elsewhere, the non-governmental National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) held a news conference here to announce that it had ‘broken with’ the Colorado project and to ‘reveal the firing of top project scientists and other incidents leading to the project’s failure.’

NICAP headquarters here has expressed strong scepticism about the project for months.

The Look article, in the May 14 issue, indicates that the two men who were dismissed and others on the staff felt that Condon and others directing the project took a negative attitude toward the possibility that flying saucers existed and were attempting to end up with a report containg such a ‘negative’ conclusion.”


Wikipedia article: “Condon Committee”:















(wikimedia.org image)

Saturday, 7 November 2015

Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO Incidents/Research/Projects Involving (Mainly) the U.S. Government,
U.S. Military and U.S. Intelligence Community


Website: The Big Study (thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com)

The blog is run by the U.S. chemist, biochemist and UFO researcher Michael D. Swords, Ph.D.

(“U.S. Government”)

(Defense)

(“U.S. Army”)

(Army)

(“U.S. Navy”)

(U.S.N.)

(Navy)

(“Army Air Force”)

(“U.S. Air Force”)

(U.S.A.F.)

(“U.S. Coast Guard”)

(“Coast Guard”)

(“Coast Guard Station”)

(“Homeland Security”)
(C.I.A.)

(“Federal Bureau of Investigation”)

(F.B.I.)

(“National Security Agency”)

(N.S.A.)

(wikimedia.org image)


(wikimedia.org image)

Monday, 6 January 2020

UFO Magazine Article:
“Someone’s Watching Over Us”


By Major Donald E. Keyhoe, USMC (Ret.), 1967
(TRUE Magazine, U.S.A.)

Source: NICAP.org

The whole article:
“Since January 1950, when TRUE published my first article on UFO’s (see page 6), there has been a tremendous change in the public attitude toward Unidentified Flying Objects. Before, the ‘flying saucers’ were ridiculed by most Americans. Only a small number knew the dramatic evidence – confirmed reports by veteran pilots and other competent witnesses. Even fewer knew of the Air Force Top Secret Estimate of the Situation – that the Flying Saucers – officially Unidentified Flying Objects – were interplanetary vehicles engaged in a long observation of the earth.

Today, according to national polls, half of our population is convinced that the UFO’s are real (see page 52). Over five million people claim to have seen strange flying objects. Some newly convinced Americans, reluctant to believe we are being observed by a technically superior race, first ask if the UFO’s aren’t highly secret devices – American or Russian. But the massive documented evidence of tremendous speeds and maneuvers far beyond any earth made craft has proved this answer impossible. More and more millions now accept the long-hidden AF explanation: The UFO’s are interplanetary probes from another world.

This great switch in public belief did not come about quickly. The January 1950 TRUE article put the first strong spotlight on UFO’s, and hundreds of witnesses reported sightings they had withheld for fear of ridicule.

In 1952, a sudden outbreak of UFO sightings made front-page news, with hundreds of verified reports by military and airline pilots, control tower operators, expert radar trackers, and other reliable observers.

Early in 1953, one group of AF Intelligence officers connected with the UFO project planned to release their most baffling cases, also unexplained photographs of UFO’s. No final conclusion was to be stated, though the released evidence would strongly point to the interplanetary answer. But at the last moment, fears of high-level officials caused the plan to be killed. Withholding of UFO reports and ‘explanations’ to prevent public excitement steadily increased.

Despite this, many military reports leaked out because the pilots and others involved opposed this cover-up as a bad policy. In addition to UFO operations over the United States, thousands of similar reports came to light in foreign countries.

In November 1957, another outbreak of sightings further strained official withholding efforts, as a number of ‘touchdown’ landings occurred in this country and abroad.

That same year, investigations were begun by NICAP – the National Investigations Committee On Aerial Phenomena – a private fact-finding group with headquarters in Washington D.C. As Director of NICAP, I have seen it grow to a powerful organization, recognized as the largest scientific UFO research group in the world, with over 12,000 members. NICAP has nearly 300 scientific and technical advisers and special consultants on space operations, astronomy, communications, and other fields bearing on UFO investigations.

Because of its serious and thorough evaluations, and its determined efforts to expose the numerous frauds, opportunists, and deluded persons spreading wild tales about UFO’s, NICAP is now accepted as the highest private UFO authority in the world. Our documented reports to Congress and the press have played a major part in making hidden facts public.

After the ‘marsh gas’ fiasco in the spring of 1966, millions of citizens began to reject the AF UFO explanations. High officials, still honestly believing that explaining away the sightings was the safest policy for the country, were caught in an unenviable spot.

The result was a decision to have an independent scientific investigation made – with officials agreeing to a ‘hands off’ policy. The University of Colorado was selected, and a number of recent sightings has already had on-the-scene investigations by one or more scientists from the Colorado project.

Even before the project began operations, NICAP played a vital part, at the request of Dr. Edward Condon, the project head, and his scientific colleagues. In addition to advice on field investigations and evaluations, NICAP has made available several hundred verified reports, including many duplications of cases in AF files.

As a result, the Colorado Project has added to NICAP hopes for a fair and impartial report to the public. Although this is not due until late spring of 1968 – and more time may be requested – public pressure for all possible answers is rapidly increasing.

With at least half the country now strongly interested, it is now more important than ever to re-examine the strongest earlier cases, to search for possibly overlooked clues. It is also extremely important that witnesses to sightings put their reports on record, to help complete the picture and also to help the already lessening ridicule. I urge everyone with factual UFO sighting information to report the details to me at NICAP, 1536 Connecticut Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20036. If you wish, we shall keep your name confidential.”

https://www.nicap.org/true-swou.htm

Related posts:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Donald+E.+Keyhoe



The late Major Donald Edward Keyhoe, U.S. Marine Corps,
NICAP Director, UFO Author & Researcher
(youtube.com image)

Wednesday, 16 January 2019

UFO Report:
“The 1966 UFO Chronology”


Created: 7 September 2006
Updated: 6 November 2018
(NICAP.org)

Quote from the UFO report:
“This is a 34-page chronology (increased from 11-pages) of UFO incidents and events for 1966, the beginning of the ‘Mother of All UFO Waves’, which lasted throughout 1966 and 1967. Our thanks for these chronologies must go to our documentation team: Richard Hall (the original chronology from UFOE II), William Wise (Project Blue Book Archive), Dan Wilson (archive researcher), and Brad Sparks (Comprehensive Catalog of Project Blue Book Unknowns). Last, but not least, our thanks to Jean Waskiewicz who created the online NICAP DBase (NSID) that helped make it possible to link from the cases to the reports themselves.

Three notable events stand out among the others are two sightings; the Dexter and Hillsdale (MI) sightings of March 20-21 (Frank Manor [sic], etc.) and the Portage County (OH) incident of April 17 (Deputies Spauer and Neff), and the event being the writing of the ‘Trick would be’ memo by Robert Low on Aug. 9th. It is extremely interesting that both 1966 and 1967 include many sightings near missile sites, and in 1966 the US reached a peak of 31,700 of stockpiled nuclear warheads. For more on the 1966-1967 sighting wave, serious researchers should get their copy of this report: ‘Alien Invasion or Human Fantasy? The 1966-67 UFO Wave’ (Richard Hall). For information on missile deployment, see To Defend & Deter. (1)

Francis Ridge
NICAP Site Coordinator

Jan. 1966; Popular Science Article
‘Why I Believe in Flying Saucers’, by MacKinlay Kantor, Pulitzer Prize winning author of ‘Andersonville’. The noted writer, co-author with Gen. Curtis E. Lemay of ‘Mission with LeMay. My Story’, tells of the strange personal sighting that convinced him that UFOs are real. (Copy provided by Ole Jonny Brænne)

Jan. 12, 1966; Sagan Requests Materials
Dr. Carl Sagan requests information from Blue Book on sightings. The Tridade Island case is referred to and the Kelley/Hopkinsville case was requested also. 

February 1966
Dr. Brian O’Brien heads a panel of the AF Scientific Advisory Board that completes a review of Project Blue Book and recommends that the AF contract with several universities to conduct UFO studies. (Sparks)

March 31, 1966; JANAP 146(E)
Joint Army Navy Air Publication 146(E), changed from 146(D) of Feb. 1, 1959. Added that photographs should be sent to the Director of Naval Intelligence. Also added special reporting instruction for unidentifiable objects. (See JANAP 146 History and Evolution).

Minuteman II ICBM Deployed to Five SAC Bases
In 1966 the Minuteman II ICBM was deployed to SAC bases: Malmstrom Air Force Base, Ellsworth Air Force Base, Minot Air Force Base, F.E. Warren Air Force Base, and Whiteman Air Force Base. Malmstrom Air Force Base was also selected as the location for an additional Minuteman squadron, and LFs and LCFs were consequently constructed at this base. The first Minuteman II was deployed at Grand Forks Air Force Base, North Dakota, in August 1965. In early 1966 UFOs were being reported at these same SAC bases.

April 5, 1966
House Armed Services Committee conducts the first and only public hearing by U.S. Congress ever held on UFO’s. Was a result of the nationwide controversy generated by AF consultant J. Allen Hynek’s ‘swamp gas’ explanation for the Hillsdale sightings.  AF is severely criticized by the Congressmen, including future President Gerald Ford.

The AF is slated to soon test a long-delayed highly classified sensor system which will obviate the need for collection of anecdotal UFO reports by an ever more embarrassing Project Blue Book. The plan for the sensor system and eventual closure of Blue Book was approved years before, on July 28, 1952, but numerous technical and budgetary delays kept giving Blue Book reprieves from termination.  Now, the AF command decides that for PR purposes after the tremendous beating it received in the press, from the public and now from Congress over its inept UFO explanations that it needs a scientific fig-leaf to cover its closure of Blue Book. This results in the contract to University of Colorado in October 1966. (Sparks)

Beginning on May 7, 1966, and throughout the rest of 1966 and into 1967, the Air Force replaced the Minuteman I Bs with Minuteman IIs at Whiteman AFB ICBM Complex.

June 6, 1966
AF Foreign Technology Division (FTD) officials decide to leak the AF-manipulated CIA Robertson Panel Report with Minutes and Comments report (Durant Memo) to visiting Navy scientist Dr. James McDonald, who was working under an ONR (Office of Naval Research) contract. The AF evidently wanted to make the CIA look bad when the report was inevitably hushed up by the CIA which complained that AF did not clear this declassification with the CIA. Fearing that McDonald was part of an ulterior Navy plot to make the AF look bad, this big show of AF openness and pretense of trying to overcome excessive CIA secretiveness would serve to make the AF look good instead. As an added bonus this sugar-coating of feigned AF openness in trying to release the Robertson Panel report actually covered a poison pill inside, since the Robertson Panel report was itself an AF-manipulated, virulently debunking anti-UFO document which set forth all of the AF's desired anti-UFO PR positions which had been systematically planted on the CIA and the Panel back in 1952 and 1953. (Sparks)

June 8, 1966
McDonald blows up at Hynek. After two days (June 6-7) of examining hundreds of Blue Book files and discussions with top AF generals, officers and scientists at FTD, McDonald concluded that the Blue Book effort was incompetent and scientifically next-to-worthless. McDonald visited Hynek, Dr. Jacques Vallee and William Powers at Northwestern University, expecting to join forces to confront the AF over its UFO policies, after McDonald had been falsely told by Prof. Charles B. Moore on April 28, 1966, that Hynek supposedly wanted to confront the AF over UFO’s. Instead, Hynek was flabbergasted at McDonald and had no intention or idea of confronting the AF, which increasingly frustrated McDonald until he blew up at Hynek and pounded on the table. Vallee commented in his diary that ‘an entire era has come to a crashing end. This man [McDonald] has many contacts, many ideas, and is afraid of nothing.’  Afterward McDonald phones Moore and demands to know what was going on and Moore admitted he ‘had not been entirely honest’ (=lied) about Hynek wanting to confront the AF, as McDonald later recorded. It was all a setup by Moore, evidently designed to get the two leading scientist investigators of UFO’s at each other’s throats so they would not join forces. Had McDonald and Hynek formed an alliance it would have threatened to turn official UFO policy into dust. (Sparks)

Aug. 9, 1966; Low ‘Trick Would Be’ Memo
The half-million-dollar ‘trick’ to make Americans believe the Condon committee was conducting an objective investigation. Memo written by Robert Low to James Archer and Thurston Manning, University of Colorado, to take on the evaluation of the Air Force Project Blue Book investigation, with the negative conclusions already planned.

Aug. 16, 1966; Various states - Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin
Sightings and radarscope photo? Newspaper clippings are the apparent source, but no details this date for events in Wisconsin. (See below for Minnesota and North Dakota incidents possibly related to news release.)

Aug. 24, 1966; Minuteman Missile Site, Minot AFB [Grano? Carpio?], ND (BBU)
10 p.m. Airman saw and reported by radio a multi-colored light high in the sky. Strike team sent to his location confirmed the object. Second object, white, was seen to pass in front of clouds. Radar detected and tracked an object. Sightings made by 3 different Minuteman ICBM missile sites. Radio interference was noted by teams sent to locations where object was hovering at ground level. (Vallée Magonia 791; FUFOR Index)

October 7, 1966 - University of Colorado UFO Project Announcement
Formation sponsored by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.
Background: Two official Jan. 1967 letters (and press release) illustrating the purpose of the CU Project

Oct. 14, 1966 - Operations and Training (re-issue of previous versions)
The Inspector General Brief - Number 21, Volume XVIII, 14 Oct. 1966
Unidentified Flying Objects (CUFON)

November 1, 1966 -  Colorado Project Begins
Official beginning of the University of Colorado UFO Project study sponsored by Air Force Office of Scientific Research.
Background: Two official Jan. 1967 letters (and press release) illustrating the purpose of the CU Project

Dec. 17, 1966: Saturday Evening Post article, ‘Are Flying Saucers Real?’

Dec. 19, 1966 - Department of State AIRGRAM
Sent to Embassy, Buenos Aires, for Scientific Attaché, reporting the Nov. 12 sighting by local astronomer. (John Schuessler)”


Wikipedia article: “Minot Air Force Base”:


Related posts:










realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Minot,+North+Dakota




















Aerial view of Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota
(wikimedia.org photo)

















Active LGM-30 Minuteman (ICBM) deployment, 2010
(text by Wikipedia) (wikimedia.org)
(wikimedia.org image)















Satellite photo of Minot, North Dakota (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)