Friday, 8 June 2018
UFO Case Directory (EMCAT):
“Minuteman Site Jammed By UFO
Aug. 24*, 1966
Minot AFB, North Dakota”
(NICAP.org)
The whole UFO case report:
“Fran Ridge:
August 24, 1966 (corrected date); Minot AFB, North
Dakota (BBU)
Radar operators picked up a UFO maneuvering over the
base at 100,000 feet .
The LCF’s sophisticated radio equipment, that enables it to receive firing
instructions from coordinating centers and transmit them to the silo Launch
Facilities (LFs) was blocked out by static when the UFO hovered directly over
it. Raymond E. Fowler, project supervisor on a Minuteman missile program near
Boston, says he talked with an Air Force officer who had been in on this
incident which took place in a subterranean Launch Control Facility (LCF) of
the North Dakota Minuteman site. Asked to comment on Mr. Fowler’s allegations, an
Air Force spokesman in Washington declared that SAC, that operates the site,
‘could find nothing in its unit histories to confirm the presence of
unidentified flying objects over it or indeed malfunctions in its equipment on
the date mentioned.’
Despite the Air Force’s denial Dr. J. Allen Hynek
insists that the base was buzzed by a UFO. ‘I went there as the Air Force
representative and talked to the people concerned after it happened,’ he says.
Dr. Hynek was at that time acting as scientific consultant to Project Bluebook.
Mr. Fowler says he was told that communications between land strike-teams
(armed jeep patrols) dispatched to a spot where the first UFO appeared to land
and intercepting aircraft (Note; F-106’s) were completely jammed by strong
radio interference. Moreover, he says, missile site control found intense
static disrupting communications with its strike-teams. After UFOs had streaked
away, Air Force Intelligence teams, descended on the base telling those who had
seen or heard anything to keep quiet. Fowler cites an AF regulation (80-17)
last updated in 1966, that establishes a system for reporting UFO sightings to
the Aerospace Defense Command at Colorado Springs and imposes penalties for the
unauthorized disclosure of UFO information. But says an Air Force spokesman:
‘We're out of the UFO business.’ ”
NICAP.org presents U.S. government
(U.S. Air Force) documents that pertain to the UFO case.
Aerial view of Minot Air Force
Base, North Dakota
(wikimedia.org photo)
(tageo.com photo)
Wednesday, 6 June 2018
UFO Article (Blog):
“How the US Influences other
Countries Policies on UFOs”
By Kevin D. Randle, 31 May 2018
(A Different Perspective, Cedar Rapids, Iowa)
Quote from the article:
“Which brings us back to the original point. The USAF
was able to influence the RAAF, leading them to a conclusion that was ill
advised. What would have happened had they known that Keyhoe did have the
inside sources, some of them official, who were providing him with quality
information about the UFO situation. Instead, there was a watered-down version
of their official report because they believed it was based on tainted
information when, in fact, the information was good.
In other words, the prominence of the USAF in the
world of UFO investigation suggested to the RAAF, that there wasn’t much to
UFOs, and the RAAF responded in kind. They thought the USAF had the ‘goods’ but
it turned out to be more fool’s gold. It looked good, it looked right but it
just wasn’t what everyone thought it was. And today we have to live with that
misguided interpretation so that we continue to have these discussions rather
than moving forward… but we see how, at least in part, the US can suppress UFO
information in other countries.”
(wikimedia.org image)
(wikimedia.org image)
Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO Incidents
At U.S. Military (Primarily) Bases/
Stations/Facilities/Installations/Depots
Website: National Investigations Committee on Aerial
Phenomena (NICAP.org):
(Search term: “Base”)
(“Bases”)
(“Station”)
(“Stations”)
(“Facility”)
(“Facilities”)
(“Installation”)
(“Installations”)
(“Silo”)
(“Silos”)
(“Missile”)
(“Missiles”)
(“Rocket”)
(“Rockets”)
(“Depot”)
(“Depots”)
(“Storage”)
(“Weapon Storage”)
(“Weapons Storage”)
(“Weapon”)
(“Weapons”)
(“Arsenal”)
(“Arsenals”)
(“Munition”)
(“Munitions”)
(“Ammunition”)
(“Dump”)
(“Dumps”)
(“Military Base”)
(“Military Bases”)
(“Military Station”)
(“Military Stations”) (no results as of 6 June 2018)
(“Military Facility”)
(“Military Facilities”)
(“Military Installation”)
(“Military Installations”)
(“Military Site”)
(“Military Sites”)
(“Army Base”)
(“Army Facility”)
(“Army Installation”)
(“Navy Base”)
(“Naval Base”)
(“Naval Bases”)
(“Navy Station”)
(“Naval Station”)
(“Navy Facility”)
(“Naval Facility”)
(“Navy Installation”)
(“Naval Installation”)
(“Air Base”)
(“Air Bases”)
(“Air Force Base”)
(“Air Force Bases”)
(“AFB”)
(“AFBs”)
(“Air Station”)
(“Air Stations”)
(“Strategic Air Command Base”)
(“Strategic Air Command Bases”)
(“SAC Base”)
(“SAC Bases”)
(“ICBM Base”)
(“ICBM Bases”)
(“ICBM Site”)
(“ICBM Sites”)
(“Missile Base”)
(“Missile Bases”)
(“Missile Station”)
(“Missile Stations”) (no results as of 6 June 2018)
(“Missile Site”)
(“Missile Sites”)
(“Missile Facility”)
(“Missile Facilities”)
(“Missile Installation”)
(“Missile Installations”)
(“Launch Facility”)
(“Launch Facilities”)
(“LF”)
(“LFs”)
(“Launch Control Facility”)
(“Launch Control Facilities”)
(“LCF”)
(“LCFs”)
(“Intercontinental Ballistic Missile”)
(“Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles”)
(“ICBM”)
(“ICBMs”)
(“Minuteman”)
(“Minutemans”)
(“Radar”)
(“Radars”)
(“Radar
Base”)
(“Radar Bases”) (no results as of 6 June 2018)
(“Radar
Station”)
(“Radar
Stations”)
(“Radar
Facility”)
(“Radar
Facilities”)
(“Radar
Installation”)
(“Radar Installations”)
(“Defense Radar”)
(“Defense Radars”)
(“Defence Radar”)
(“Defence Radars”)
(“Military Radar”)
(“Military Radars”)
(“Army Radar”)
(“Army Radars”) (no results as of 6 June 2018)
(“Navy Radar”)
(“Navy Radars”)
(“Naval Radar”)
(“Marine Radar”)
(“U.S. Air Force Radar”)
(“Air Force Radar”)
(“Air Force Radars”)
(“AF Air Defense Radars”)
(“Air Defense Radar”)
(“Air Defense Radars”)
Related posts:
(wikimedia.org image)
Tuesday, 5 June 2018
UFO Magazine Article:
“ARE UFOs SURVEYING
OUR STRATEGIC AREAS?”
By Richard H. Hall, May 1976
(Official UFO)
Source: NICAP.org
Quote from the article:
“Our military facilities, electrical generating
stations and fuel reserves are haunted by UFOs, which keep careful watch on the
important activities below.”
Related posts:
The late Richard H. Hall,
former NICAP Assistant Director,
UFO Author & Researcher (cache.boston.com
photo)
Monday, 4 June 2018
UFO Case Reports:
“Intelligence Summary: Missile Base Incidents”
(NICAP.org)
The UFO cases (text by NICAP.org):
“January 10, 1961; Cape Canaveral, Florida
Summer of 1961; Near Moscow
August 7, 1962; Oracle, Arizona
September 15, 1964; Big Sur, California
April, 1966; Malmstrom AFB, Montana (BBU)
June 16, 1966; Elista, Kalmuk, Russia
August 24, 1966; Minot AFB, [Grano? Carpio?] North
Dakota (BBU)
March 5, 1967; Minot AFB, North Dakota (BBU)
March 16, 1967; 15 miles N of Lewistown,
Montana (BBU)
March 24/25, 1967; Nr. Roy (about 30 miles NE of Lewiston,
Montana (BBU)
March 30, 1967; Malmstrom AFB, Montana
Oct. 24, 1968; About 30 miles NW of Minot AFB,
North Dakota (BBU)
October 30, 1975; Wurtsmith AFB, Michigan
November 7, 1975; Malmstrom AFB, Montana
November 8, 1975; Malmstrom AFB, Montana”
The intelligence summary is produced by the Nuclear
Connection Project.
“Nuclear Connection Project (NCP)” (NICAP.org):
Established: 1 July 2003.
Updated: 26 January 2015 (as of 4 June 2018).
Francis L. Ridge, Project Coordinator.
Related posts:
Aerial view of Malmstrom Air Force Base, Great Falls, Montana
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
