“June 18, 1974 – At 3:30 p.m. on a sunny afternoon a strange metallic flying object flew around over the sea off the State of Santa Catarina, Brazil. It was at a distance of some thousand metres or so from the shore at Navegantes. After hovering for some six minutes above the sea, it veered at a 90 degree angle towards the beach and then dropped into the sea. Fisherman Avelino Severiano Generosa, age 46, his parents, his wife, and his nine children were all on the beach when they saw the silent, bright shiny object flying very low along the shore. It remaining stationary for six minutes, then it dropped into the sea. He at once put out in his motor-launch to the area, but found only foam on the sea where the object had disappeared. There were twenty other people on the beach who also saw the object, but none of the others had the courage to go out in the boat to see what was happening. Days later Celso Lemkuni, a diver, tried to make a dive to locate the object, but had no success owing to the strong winds lashing the coast. (Source: Gordon Creighton, ‘Alleged Kidnappings and Other Matters,’ FSR, March-April 1975, pp. 21-22, citing O Dia, July 12, 1974).”
Monday, 23 May 2016
Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO Incidents At Beaches
Website: UFO Casebook (ufocasebook.com):
(Search term: “On the Beach”)
(“On Beach”)
(“At the Beach”)
(“At Beach”)
(“Over the Beach”)
(“Over Beach”)
(“Above the Beach”)
(“Above Beach”)
(“Near the Beach”)
(“Near Beach”)
(“a Beach”)
(“Beach Resort”)
(“Beach Hotel”)
Website: UFOINFO.com:
(“On the Beach”)
(“On Beach”)
(“At the Beach”)
(“At Beach”)
(“Over the Beach”)
(“Over Beach”)
(“Above the Beach”)
(“Above Beach”)
(“Near the Beach”)
(“the Beach”)
(“a Beach”)
Website: UFO DNA (thecid.com/ufo):
(“On the Beach”)
(“On Beach”)
(“At the Beach”)
(“At Beach”)
(“Over the Beach”)
(“Over Beach”)
(“Above the Beach”)
(“Above Beach”)
(“Near the Beach”)
(“the Beach”)
(“a Beach”)
(“Beach Resort”)
(“Beach Hotel”)
UFOINFO.com UFO case report:
“June 18, 1974 – At 3:30 p.m. on a sunny afternoon a strange metallic flying object flew around over the sea off the State of Santa Catarina, Brazil. It was at a distance of some thousand metres or so from the shore at Navegantes. After hovering for some six minutes above the sea, it veered at a 90 degree angle towards the beach and then dropped into the sea. Fisherman Avelino Severiano Generosa, age 46, his parents, his wife, and his nine children were all on the beach when they saw the silent, bright shiny object flying very low along the shore. It remaining stationary for six minutes, then it dropped into the sea. He at once put out in his motor-launch to the area, but found only foam on the sea where the object had disappeared. There were twenty other people on the beach who also saw the object, but none of the others had the courage to go out in the boat to see what was happening. Days later Celso Lemkuni, a diver, tried to make a dive to locate the object, but had no success owing to the strong winds lashing the coast. (Source: Gordon Creighton, ‘Alleged Kidnappings and Other Matters,’ FSR, March-April 1975, pp. 21-22, citing O Dia, July 12, 1974).”
“June 18, 1974 – At 3:30 p.m. on a sunny afternoon a strange metallic flying object flew around over the sea off the State of Santa Catarina, Brazil. It was at a distance of some thousand metres or so from the shore at Navegantes. After hovering for some six minutes above the sea, it veered at a 90 degree angle towards the beach and then dropped into the sea. Fisherman Avelino Severiano Generosa, age 46, his parents, his wife, and his nine children were all on the beach when they saw the silent, bright shiny object flying very low along the shore. It remaining stationary for six minutes, then it dropped into the sea. He at once put out in his motor-launch to the area, but found only foam on the sea where the object had disappeared. There were twenty other people on the beach who also saw the object, but none of the others had the courage to go out in the boat to see what was happening. Days later Celso Lemkuni, a diver, tried to make a dive to locate the object, but had no success owing to the strong winds lashing the coast. (Source: Gordon Creighton, ‘Alleged Kidnappings and Other Matters,’ FSR, March-April 1975, pp. 21-22, citing O Dia, July 12, 1974).”
Satellite photo of Navegantes, Brazil (tageo.com)
(tageo.com image)
Sunday, 22 May 2016
Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO Incidents At Beaches
Website: National Investigations Committee on Aerial
Phenomena (NICAP.org):
(Search term: “On the Beach”)
(“On Beach”)
(“At the Beach”)
(“Over the Beach”)
(“Over Beach”)
(“Above the Beach”)
(“Above Beach”)
(“Near the Beach”)
(“Near Beach”)
(“a Beach”)
(“Beach Resort”)
(nicap.org image)
Website: National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC.org):
(“On the Beach”)
(“On Beach”)
(“At the Beach”)
(“At Beach”)
(“Over the Beach”)
(“Over Beach”)
(“Above the Beach”)
(“Above Beach”)
(“Near the Beach”)
(“Near Beach”)
(“a Beach”)
https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Beach+Resort”+site:nuforc.org
(“Beach Resort”)
(“Beach Resort”)
(“Beach Hotel”)
(nuforc.org image)
Saturday, 21 May 2016
UFO News Article:
“ ‘Just The Facts’ On UFOs”
18 February 1968
(St. Petersburg Times, Florida)
The article reports on Mort Young’s book, “UFO: TOP
SECRET” (Publisher: Essandress Special Editions, 1967):
Quote from the article:
“Of all the books on the subject, his is certainly the most concise and tightly reasoned.”
“Of all the books on the subject, his is certainly the most concise and tightly reasoned.”
(amazon.com image)
Friday, 20 May 2016
Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO Incidents At Interstate Highways:
I-16, I-17, I-19, I-20, I-22, I-24, I-25 and I-26
(Main Interstate Routes)
U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT):
Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA):
“FHWA Route Log and Finder List”:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/national_highway_system/interstate_highway_system/routefinder/index.cfm
“FHWA Route Log and Finder List:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/national_highway_system/interstate_highway_system/routefinder/index.cfm
“FHWA Route Log and Finder List:
Table 1: Main Routes of the Dwight D. Eisenhower
National System of Interstate and Defense Highways ”:
Interstate
16 (I-16) (Georgia), Interstate 17 (I-17) (Arizona), Interstate 19 (I-19)
(Arizona), Interstate 20 (I-20) (Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama,
Georgia, South Carolina), Interstate 22 (I-22) (Mississippi, Alabama), Interstate
24 (I-24) (Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia), Interstate 25 (I-25) (New
Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming), Interstate 26 (I-26) (North Carolina, South
Carolina, Tennessee).
Website:
National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC.org):
(Search
term: Interstate 16 (I-16) (Georgia))
(I-16 (Georgia))
(Interstate 17 (I-17) (Arizona))
(I-17 (Arizona))
(Interstate
19 (I-19) (Arizona))
(I-19 (Arizona))
(Interstate 20 (I-20) (Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi,
Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina))
(I-20 (Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama,
Georgia,
South Carolina))
South Carolina))
(Interstate 22 (I-22) (Mississippi, Alabama))
(no cases as of 20 May 2016)
(no cases as of 20 May 2016)
(I-22 (Mississippi, Alabama))
(no cases as of 20 May 2016)
(no cases as of 20 May 2016)
(Interstate 24 (I-24) (Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee,
Georgia))
(I-24 (Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia))
(Interstate 25 (I-25) (New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming))
(I-25 (New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming))
(Interstate 26 (I-26) (North Carolina, South Carolina,
Tennessee))
(I-26 (North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee))
Website: UFO DNA (thecid.com/ufo)
(NOTE: Most of the reports come from NUFORC.org):
(Interstate 16 (I-16) (Georgia))
(I-16 (Georgia))
(Interstate
17 (I-17) (Arizona))
(I-17 (Arizona))
(Interstate
19 (I-19) (Arizona))
(I-19 (Arizona))
(Interstate 20 (I-20) (Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi,
Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina))
(no cases as of 20 May 2016)
(no cases as of 20 May 2016)
(I-20 (Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama,
Georgia,
South Carolina))
South Carolina))
(Interstate 22 (I-22) (Mississippi, Alabama))
(no cases as of 20 May 2016)
(no cases as of 20 May 2016)
(I-22 (Mississippi, Alabama))
(no cases as of 20 May 2016)
(no cases as of 20 May 2016)
(Interstate 24 (I-24) (Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee,
Georgia))
(I-24 (Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia))
(Interstate 25 (I-25) (New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming))
(I-25 (New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming))
(Interstate 26 (I-26) (North Carolina, South Carolina,
Tennessee))
(I-26 (North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee))
NOTE: I-22 (omitted from the U.S. Interstate Highway System Map): Mississippi (Tupelo, New Albany, Holly Springs), Alabama (Birmingham).
Wikipedia article: “Interstate 16”:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_16
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_26
Related post:
NOTE: I-22 (omitted from the U.S. Interstate Highway System Map): Mississippi (Tupelo, New Albany, Holly Springs), Alabama (Birmingham).
Wikipedia article: “Interstate 16”:
Wikipedia article: “Interstate 17”:
Wikipedia article: “Interstate 19”:
Wikipedia article: “Interstate 20”:
Wikipedia article: “Interstate 22”:
Wikipedia article: “Interstate 24”:
Wikipedia article: “Interstate 25”:
Wikipedia article: “Interstate 26”:
Related post:
(wikimedia.org image)
Thursday, 19 May 2016
UFO News Article:
“Thousands of New Yorkers report seeing UFOs”
30 August 1984
(The Ledger, Lakeland, Florida)
The article reports on the 1980s Hudson Valley, New
York, UFO wave:
Quote from the article:
“It seems that thousands of people in the area have
reported seeing strange objects in the night sky. Usually described as V-shaped
and about the size of a football field, the colossal ‘Thing’ is said to be absolutely
noiseless and outlined in brilliant lights of white, green and amber.
(Eugene) Bauer (technician for a fiber optics firm) says
he saw the Thing one night in March 1983 as he and a friend were driving home
from a restaurant.
‘It floated above our car, no more than 150 feet up, standing
still,’ he said. ‘I don’t know what it was, but I know it didn’t come from this
Earth.’
Bauer was among a dozen supposed witnesses who
recounted their stories before an enthralled audience at the Aug. 25 ‘UFO
Conference,’ the agenda of which stretched a full 12 hours.
Dennis Sant, deputy clerk of Putnam County, N.Y., approached
the microphone to tell of having watched ‘it’ hover over Interstate Highway 84
one moonlit night.”
Related posts:
Related posts:
Wednesday, 18 May 2016
UFO Case Report:
“Ham Radio Operator Hears
American Airlines Pilot Report UFO.”
By William Puckett (Montana State MUFON Director),
6 February 2016
(UFOs Northwest, Helena, Montana)
Quote from the UFO case report:
“Location of Sighting: Near Nephi, Utah
Date of Sighting: January
14, 2016
Time of Sighting: Between
12:12 and 12:13 AM MST
Background: This case
was reported to me by Erica Lukes who is the director of MUFON for the state of
Utah. She knows a radio show host (Pat Daniels) who was scanning communications
between aircraft and the FAA shortly after midnight on January 14, 2016. He
heard a conversation between an airline pilot and Air Route Traffic Control.
The pilot reported seeing an extremely large bright
object that he estimated a mile wide to his right. The air traffic controller
told him that he was looking in the direction of Nephi, Utah. Apparently the
air traffic controller told the pilot that the object was not detected on
radar. The object appeared to keep pace with the aircraft.
A Freedom of Information (FOIA) request was written to
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). About six weeks later we received a
response to the FOIA. The response consisted of radar returns, voice tapes and
tower logs. The FAA is to be commended for their full and timely response to our
request.
Research showed that the aircraft was American
Airlines Flight Number 434 which was enroute from San Francisco, CA to
Philadelphia, PA. The actual sighting time was between 12:12 and 12:13 AM MST
on January 14, 2016. We were able to find segments of the conversation on the
Air Traffic Control archives website, but much of conversation was deleted. One
could hear the controller telling the pilot that Nephi, Utah was off to his
right and the pilot acknowledging the transmission. However, the UFO report was
not on the tape. The ham radio operator did not record the conversation so the ‘UFO
report’ could not be heard. He heard the conversation on the frequency of
127.95 mhz.
Update: March 4, 2016.
The voice tape obtained from the FAA (see above) does fill in some of the
transmission missing from the tape from the Air Traffic Control archives
website. The only thing not included from the original transmission was the
estimated size of the object and the and the conversation where the FAA said
that the object was not detected on radar. The airline crew described the
object as a large orange square.
An animation was constructed for each revolution of
the radar (12 seconds). The radar animation frames are speeded up to one
second/revolution in the animation. (Animation follows voice tape above.) The
animation shows 1 to 3 returns for each revolution of the radar. There are a
few rotations where no returns are detected. This is strange. There is no
detected conventional movement and the returns vary from 0 to 3 over the 7
minute period. The time period is from 12:08 to 12:15 AM MST which is a few
minutes before and after the pilot reported the strange object. One wonders if
the object was moving erratically and perhaps was rotating exposing more or
less radar cross sectional area resulting in no detection or a different number
of returns? The object could have been large considering this type of ‘radar
signature?’
A visual trace of the FAA tape is shown in Figure 1. Pat Daniels (ham radio operator) stated in a radio interview that the aircraft radioed the FAA and inquired whether radar showed anything in the area of their sighting. This conversation was around a minute before the conversation where the FAA told the crew that the town to the right was Nephi, Utah. There was some conversation in this time frame. (See annotation in Figure 1.) However, the conversation has been deleted and only a second or two not ‘redacted.’ The question is why did the FAA redact this conversation? According to Pat Daniels the crew did not announce their flight number when they first sighted the object. So perhaps the FAA didn’t include it for that reason. Or perhaps they did not want the public to hear the conversation? In the recorded conversation starting just after 12:12 AM the crew was talking about their sighting and the FAA responded ‘you mean to the right.’ How did they know that? They knew because they had it on radar.”
A visual trace of the FAA tape is shown in Figure 1. Pat Daniels (ham radio operator) stated in a radio interview that the aircraft radioed the FAA and inquired whether radar showed anything in the area of their sighting. This conversation was around a minute before the conversation where the FAA told the crew that the town to the right was Nephi, Utah. There was some conversation in this time frame. (See annotation in Figure 1.) However, the conversation has been deleted and only a second or two not ‘redacted.’ The question is why did the FAA redact this conversation? According to Pat Daniels the crew did not announce their flight number when they first sighted the object. So perhaps the FAA didn’t include it for that reason. Or perhaps they did not want the public to hear the conversation? In the recorded conversation starting just after 12:12 AM the crew was talking about their sighting and the FAA responded ‘you mean to the right.’ How did they know that? They knew because they had it on radar.”
(ufosnw.com image)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



