Showing posts sorted by relevance for query 1969 Van Horne, Iowa. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query 1969 Van Horne, Iowa. Sort by date Show all posts

Sunday, 23 July 2017

Google Search:
Focus On the 13 July 1969 Van Horne, Iowa,
UFO Landing Trace Case


Quote from NICAP.org’s “The 1969 UFO Chronology” (nicap.org):
“Neighbors of the family contributed the remarks that their dogs were making a racket that evening. Van Horne stands as one of the best ‘landing effects’ cases on record. This is because it has multiple witnesses, an immediate corroberation of the trace by someone who knew exactly the state of his farm fields, no desire for publicity [in fact a parent who blocked almost all of it], no motivation [in fact, a loss of valuable crop], multiple, early-on-scene investigators with good track records for straight-shooting, and a fairly large and mysterious effect. On some scales of rating ‘trace’ cases, this might be #1.”


Wikipedia article: “Van Horne, Iowa”:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Horne,_Iowa

Van Horne, Iowa, is part of the Cedar Rapids Metropolitan Statistical Area, according to the Wikipedia article.







The 13 July 1969 Van HorneIowa, UFO landing imprint 
(CE2 case – soybean crop)
(4.bp.blogspot.com/thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com photo)















Satellite photo of Cedar Rapids, Iowa (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

Wednesday, 20 November 2019

UFO Case Report:
“July 13, 1969; Van Horne, IA”


(NICAP.org)

The whole UFO case report:
“11:00 PM. A high school girl was having her cousin [a beautician] over for a visit and a sleep-over. The two young women were still up when they heard a sound outside. Looking out their window, they saw an object above the field across the road. It was less than a mile away. The thing appeared to be a gray metallic disk, non-luminous, but with a orange-red band of light around the circumference. This light enabled the girls to see the shape clearly: like ‘a shallow inverted bowl with a curved bottom’. The object was ‘clean’ [no protrusions nor individual lights]. The object came directly over the farmhouse, its vibrations rattling the bedroom windows. [The parents were asleep already and did not awaken]. The girls felt that the disk was ‘the size of an automobile’ and was rotating counter-clockwise as it rose and sailed away. The next morning they told the one girl’s parents what had happened but were not believed. That morning however, the father was out walking the fields and came across a forty foot diameter circle of dried out soybean crop, which had not previously been there. This area was not only a ‘perfect’ circle but in the proper location for the sighting of the UFO. The appearance of the affected crop was ‘all of the leaves of each plant were hanging wilted from the stalks’ as if, the UFO field researcher hypothesized, ‘they had been subjected to intense heat’. The spot was apparently the result of a ‘near-landing’ rather than an actual touch-down, as the plants were not broken off nor crushed. A fine aerial photo of this circle has been made and is attached to this report. The UFO community was on the scene relatively early, with the APRO investigator taking the photos and soil samples, and Walt Andrus of MUFON/APRO interviewing the daughter [the only early interview of the cousin was by news persons]. As was almost universally the case APRO dropped the ball on the analysis of the samples and reported only that the plants were dry, shriveled, and not radioactive.  Dr. J. Allen Hynek even visited the site and was later quoted: ‘I still don’t know what the hell this thing is all about... It looked as though a big heater had been held six feet above the ground’. Neighbors of the family contributed the remarks that their dogs were making a racket that evening. Van Horne stands as one of the best ‘landing effects’ cases on record. This is because it has multiple witnesses, an immediate corroberation [sic] of the trace by someone who knew exactly the state of his farm fields, no desire for publicity [in fact a parent who blocked almost all of it], no motivation [in fact, a loss of valuable crop], multiple, early-on-scene investigators with good track records for straight-shooting, and a fairly large and mysterious effect. On some scales of rating ‘trace’ cases, this might be #1. [Mike Swords; References: a). APRO UFO Report Form (case field investigation), undated but c. September 1969 (Hynek/CUFOS files); ‘Saucer Near Landing In Iowa’, SKYLOOK #23, October 1969; ‘UFO Over Iowa Bean Field’, APRO Bulletin, July-August 1969: Kevin Randle, ‘The Iowa UFO Landings’, Official UFO Fall 1976; [news note] DATA-NET V(9): September 1971; Al Swegle, ‘Sight UFO Over Benton County Farm’, Cedar Rapids Gazette, August 15, 1969.]”

I also presented this UFO case report on 24 March 2016.


Wikipedia article: “Van Horne, Iowa”:


Related posts:






realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Animal+Reaction









The 13 July 1969 Van HorneIowa, UFO landing imprint 
(CE2 case – soybean crop)
(4.bp.blogspot.com/thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com photo)














Satellite photo of Cedar Rapids, Iowa (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

UFO News Article:
“Sight UFO Over Benton County Farm”


6 August 1969
(The Gazette, Cedar Rapids, Iowa)

Source: Newspapers.com

The whole article:
“Under any other set of circumstances, Warren ‘Bud’ Barr would say lightning struck his soybean fields the evening of Sunday, July 13 [1969].

While he was doing chores the following morning, the Benton County farmer noticed that a 15-foot circular area in his bean field had been charred to the ground. No other part of the field was touched.

At breakfast his 15-year-old daughter, Pat, and her cousin, Kathy Mahr, 19, gave him another explanation for the barren spot.

‘Kathy and I were about to go to bed at 11 Sunday evening, when we looked out our west window and saw red-orange lights hovering just a few hundred feet from the house,’ Pat recalled.

Black Object

The black metallic object was moving and vanished over a neighbour’s field northwest of the Barr home. The object was about the same size as the barren spot in the soybean field.

‘I know that it wasn’t a jet, a helicopter, or a small plane,’ Pat said. ‘It was shaped like two saucers put together upside down.’

The Barr family doesn’t say that the object was from another planet. But their beans haven’t had any trouble with armyworms either.

It could have been lightning, Bud Barr believes, but he hasn’t tried to collect on his crop insurance. The family said the air was quiet around 11 p.m., although it had rained earlier in the evening.

Lightning Effects

When lightning strikes, the center of a circular area is usually barren, but the edges taper off, Vivian Jennings, Cedar Rapids area extension crops specialist, said. In Barr’s field, the whole 15-foot area was barren, and other portions of the field were not affected.

The family weren’t able to find any imprints in the area, and they did not report the strange activities to authorities.

Several citizens reported what they believed to be an unidentified flying object near the Cedar Rapids municipal airport in June. The Cedar Rapids municipal airport air traffic control tower has not had any reports of unusual activity on June 13, although they usually ask that citizens forward reports on to military authorities at Offutt air force base, Omaha, or University of Colorado, Colorado Springs.

No Life

Two space flights since then have eliminated the theory that the object might have been sent from the moon or Mars. There isn’t any life on Mars, you’ll recall.

‘But it could have been from Venus,’ Pat said. ‘Imagine what their scientists would say if they thought earth was a giant Iowa soybean field.’ Pat is a senior at Benton Community high school.

The Barr farm is located approximately five miles northwest of Vinton.”

The article contains a photo of Warren Barr’s soybean field.

NOTE: NICAP.org and other credible UFO research sources
report that Warren Barr’s farm was located just outside Van
Horne (located just west of Cedar Rapids). Van Horne is
located to the south west of Vinton.


Wikipedia article: “Van Horne, Iowa”:


Related posts:



realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=1969









The 13 July 1969 Van HorneIowa, UFO landing imprint 
(CE2 case – soybean crop)
(4.bp.blogspot.com/thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com photo)














Satellite photo of Cedar Rapids, Iowa (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

Wednesday, 30 November 2016

Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO Incidents Involving Children


Website: UFO DNA (thecid.com/ufo):

UFO DNA UFO case report:
13 July 1969 23:00
Van Horne, Iowa, USA 
(the UFO incident occurred on 13 July, 
not on 12 July, according to NICAP.org)

13 Jul 1969 - 
Van Horne, Iowa, USA

Two teenage girls see a dull gray-black metallic colored inverted bowl-shaped object with a circular reddish-orange band of light about two-thirds of the way down it. The next morning a 40-foot diameter burned circle is found in the field.

At 11:00 p.m. a dark gray, metallic inverted bowl-shaped disc flew over a farm in Van Horne, Iowa during a rainstorm, spinning counter-clockwise. It had a reddish-orange band two-thirds of the way from its bottom to the top, and made a noise like a jet. The witnesses were three teenage girls. A 40-foot circle of wilted soybean plants was found, but the plants were not bent over or crushed.
_______________________________________________

One orange-red star was observed by three witnesses one of them independent for two minutes.

(J. Allen) Hynek reported:

Two teenaged girls stated that they were exceedingly frightened late one evening when, looking out from their farmhouse bedroom window, they espied the ‘traditional’ lighted craft gliding away from the farmhouse, accompanied by a jetlike sound. The father of one of the girls, a farmer, had just that day examined his soybean field in preparation for cultivation and had found it in good order.

Shortly after the UFO sighting there was a light rain, and early the next morning the farmer went out to check whether the rain had been severe enough to interfere with his planned cultivation. To his surprise he found a 40-foot devastated circle in midfield where none had been less than a half day before. He had no explanation for it. He had learned of the girls' experience but had promptly discounted it until he saw his soybean field. The place where the girls had seen their object was not inconsistent with the position of the destroyed ring of plants.

I visited the farm several weeks after the event and saw the circular patch for myself. The leaves of each plant were hanging wilted from the stalks as though they had been subjected to intense heat, but the stalks themselves were not broken or bent, and there were no marks of any land in the soil. Everything appeared as though the heat or destroying agent was applied directly from above and at close range but without direct contact.

The object that may have been associated with the circle was reported by the girls to have been observed at close range from their window, then to have turned to the northwest (it came from the south; the girls were looking out a north window, and the field was to the south of the house about a mile away) and disappeared, leaving only an orange glow in the sky. According to their report, it was spinning counterclockwise and had the shape of a shallow inverted bowl with a curved bottom.

It appeared to be a dull gray-black metallic color with a circular reddish-orange band of light about two-thirds of the way from the bottom to the top. It was the illumination from the orange light that disclosed the shape of the object. No protrusions were visible, and there were no individual lights — only the band of orange light. In size it was described as three or four times the diameter of the moon, and one of the girls thought it appeared as large as an automobile would have at the estimated distance.

Because of local publicity the farmer refused to let the girls be interviewed by me but was himself fully accommodating in showing me the circle and answering questions. He wished no further publicity, made no attempt to capitalize on the event, and left me with the feeling that if the whole thing had in some way been a hoax, it would be difficult to discover any possible reason for his choosing to destroy a portion of his field (and by what means?) in the absence of any desire for publicity or monetary gain.

It has often been reported but seldom carefully documented that immediately after a close UFO encounter the top branches of adjacent trees have been found broken and the leaves wilted.”


Wikipedia article: “Van Horne, Iowa”:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Horne,_Iowa

Van Horne, Iowa, is part of the Cedar Rapids Metropolitan Statistical Area, according to the Wikipedia article.

Related posts:







The 13 July 1969 Van Horne, Iowa, UFO landing imprint 
(CE2 case – soybean crop)
(4.bp.blogspot.com/thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com photo)




















Satellite photo of Cedar Rapids, Iowa (tageo.com)
(tageo.com photo)

Thursday, 24 March 2016

Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO Incidents Involving
UFO Landing/UFO Landing/Physical Traces


Website: National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP.org):
(Landing)

(Landing Trace)

(Landing Traces)

(Physical Trace)

(Physical Traces)

(Trace)

(Traces)

(Tripod Trace)

(Mark)

(Marks)
(Indentation)

(Indentations)

(Hole)

(Holes)

(Into Earth)

(Into Ground)

NICAP.org UFO case report:
“July 13, 1969; Van Horne, IA”:

http://www.nicap.org/waves/1969fullrep.htm

Related post:

google-searches-focus-on-ufo-incidents.html














The 13 July 1969 Van Horne, Iowa, UFO landing imprint 
(CE2 case – soybean crop)
(4.bp.blogspot.com/thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com photo)

Sunday, 5 March 2017

Google Website Searches:
Focus On UFO Incidents
Involving Damage To Plants


Website: UFO DNA (thecid.com/ufo):

(Search term: “a Plant”)

(“Plants”)

Related posts:


realtvufos.blogspot.com/2016/03/google-searches-focus-on-ufo-incidents.html












The 13 July 1969 Van HorneIowa, UFO landing imprint 
(CE2 case – soybean crop)
(4.bp.blogspot.com/thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com photo)