Google Website Searches: Focus On UFO Incidents Involving Radar Tracking of UFOs

Website: ​Comisión de Estudio del Fenomeno OVNI Republica Argentina (CEFORA.com.ar), Victoria, Argentina:

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Radar”+site:cefora.com.ar

(Search term: “Radar”)

Website: Visión OVNI (visionovni.com.ar), Victoria, Argentina:

https://www.google.com/search?q=“Radar”+site:visionovni.com.ar

(“Radar”)

https://www.google.com/search?q=“Radares”+site:visionovni.com.ar

(“Radares”)

https://www.google.com/search?q=“Radars”+site:visionovni.com.ar

(“Radars”)

Website: Portal Fenomenum (fenomenum.com.br), Brazil:

https://www.google.com/search?q=“Radar”+site:fenomenum.com.br

(“Radar”)

https://www.google.com/search?q=“Radares”+site:fenomenum.com.br

(“Radares”)

https://www.google.com/search?q=“Radars”+site:fenomenum.com.br

(“Radars”)

Website: Revista UFO (Brazilian UFO Magazine) (ufo.com.br), Campo Grande, Brazil:

https://www.google.com/search?q=“Radar”+site:ufo.com.br

(“Radar”)

https://www.google.com/search?q=“Radares”+site:ufo.com.br

(“Radares”)

https://www.google.com/search?q=“Radars”+site:ufo.com.br

(“Radars”)

UFO case report:

“CASO FEDERICO MACHAIN”
(“FEDERICO MACHAIN CASE”)

29 March 2009

(​Comisión de Estudio del Fenomeno OVNI Republica Argentina (CEFORA.com.ar), Victoria, Argentina)

In June 1965, Lieutenant Federico Machain, Argentine Air Force, chased a UFO (in his NA airplane) over the Punta Indio Naval Air Base (Spanish: Base Aeronaval Punta Indio), Argentina.

The UFO was also recorded on radar.

http://www.cefora.com.ar/archivos/46

English translation (by Google Translate):

https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=es&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cefora.com.ar%2Farchivos%2F46

Wikipedia article: “Punta Indio Naval Air Base”:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punta_Indio_Naval_Air_Base

Related posts:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=“Radar”

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=“Radars”

Satellite photo of Punta Indio Naval Air Base, Argentina 
(tageo.com) (tageo.com photo)

Google Website Searches: Focus On UFO Incidents Involving Radar Tracking of UFOs

Website: J. Allen Hynek Center for UFO Studies (CUFOS.org):

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Radar”+site:cufos.org

(Search term: “Radar”)

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Radars”+site:cufos.org

(“Radars”)

Website: National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP.org):

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Radar”+site:nicap.org

(“Radar”)

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Radars”+site:nicap.org

(“Radars”)

Website: Archives For the Unexplained (AFU.se), Norrköping, Sweden:

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Radar”+site:afu.se

(“Radar”)

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Radars”+site:afu.se

(“Radars”)

Related posts:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/2017/06/google-website-searches-focus-on-ufo.html

realtvufos.blogspot.com/2015/12/google-website-searches-focus-on-1952_24.html

realtvufos.blogspot.com/2017/08/google-website-searches-focus-on-us.html

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=“Radar”

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=“Radars”

“Diagram of the UFOs tracked by Washington’s National 

Airport radar scope on 20 July 1952. At A, 7 objects approach

 the Nation’s capital from the south. At B, some are seen over

the White House and Capitol. At C, they appear over Andrews

Air Force Base. At D, one UFO tracks an airliner. At E, one is

seen to make a sharp right angle turn.” Source: UFOs – 

A Pictorial History From Antiquity to the Present, by David C. 
Knight. (McGraw Hill Book Co., 1979.) (rense.com image)

Google Website Searches: Focus On U.S. Government UFO Documents Mentioning Radar/Radars

Website: The Computer UFO Network (CUFON.org), Seattle, Washington

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Radar”+site:cufon.org

(Search term: “Radar”)

https://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=“Radars”+site:cufon.org

(“Radars”)

Related post:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=“1957+CIA+Memo+Concerning+UFO+Report”

(wikimedia.org image)

UFO Article: “The ‘Other’ Rendlesham Forest UFO Encounters”

By Nick Redfern, 9 June 2017

(Mysterious Universe, St. Leonards, Australia)

http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2017/06/the-other-rendlesham-forest-ufo-encounters/

Related posts:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Rendlesham+Forest

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Bentwaters

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Woodbridge

Map of RAF Bentwaters, RAF Woodbridge, UK, and the 

December 1980 UFO landing site (2.bp.blogspot.com image)

UFO News Article: “Air Force Pacts for Saucer Probe But Can’t Wait To Discount UFOs”

18 October 1967

(The Desert Sun, Palm Springs, California)

Source: California Digital Newspaper Collection, Center for Bibliographic Studies and Research, University of California, Riverside, California (http://cdnc.ucr.edu)

Quote from the article:

“To get back to Flying Saucers—Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs), that is:

The North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) knows what it thinks about them. A recent issue of the NORAD News Service, published in Colorado Springs, carried an article headlined somewhat this way:

UFOs NOT SAUCERS, NO THREAT Says NORAD

This might strike you as a bit presumptuous, considering that: 
—NORAD’s boss, the U.S. Air Force, last year contracted (for $313,000) with the University of Colorado to conduct a scientific investigation to find out just what the—just what in the world UFOs really are.

As far as the air defense command is concerned, the NORAD News Service reported, UFOs ‘have never been shown to be anything but natural atmospheric or astronomical phenomena or airborne objects —birds, insects, hardware—seen under unusual circumstances.’ ”

https://cdnc.ucr.edu/cgi-bin/cdnc?a=d&d=DS19671018.2.93

Related posts:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=“NORAD+And+The+UFO+Smokescreen”

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=NORAD

(wikimedia.org image)

UFO News Article: “One Out of Four In U.S. Believes ‘Saucers’ Real”

20 March 1950

(St. Petersburg Times, Florida)

Quote from the article:

“The Air Force wearily repeated its opinion yesterday–flying saucers are only figments of the imagination.

In Pittsburgh, Herb Morrison, a former lieutenant colonel in the Air Force and a pilot for 20 years, said,  ‘I didn’t believe in flying saucers until I saw them.’

Morrison said he saw five saucers one day while playing golf with six friends.

‘They were definitely not airplanes and two of them even appeared to be flying loose formation,’ he said.”

https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=888&dat=19500320&id=IwFPAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XE4DAAAAIBAJ&pg=4009,1685603

(wikimedia.org image)

UFO News Article: “Marine Pilots Spot Eerie Flying Object”

12 February 1953

(Greensboro Daily News, North Carolina)

Source: The UFO Chronicles

The glowing, disk-like object was sighted by four pilots stationed at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, Havelock, North Carolina.

One of the pilots, Marine 1st Lieutenant Ed Balacco, saw the UFO near Edenton, North Carolina, while flying his F9F Panther jet.

http://www.theufochronicles.com/2017/08/eerie-ufo-reported-to-land-by-marine-pilots.html

Wikipedia article: “Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point”:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_Corps_Air_Station_Cherry_Point

Satellite photo of Edenton, North Carolina (tageo.com)

(tageo.com photo)

U.S. Government UFO Document: “SUBJECT: Air Space Violation at Oak Ridge, Tennessee”

Date: 27 July 1953

(U.S. Army, Washington, D.C.)

Source: NICAP.org

The whole document:

“THRU: Commanding General

Third Army

Fort McPherson, Georgia

ATTN: AC of S. G2

TO: The Adjutant General

Washington 25 D.C.

1. Reference: Section VIII, paragraph 73b, AR 380-5.

2. The following report of unidentified objects by Norman H. Brown, Acting Chief, Review and Analysis Section, AEC, has been received from the Senior Instructor, USAR Instructor Group, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and is transmitted herewith in accordance with directive cited in paragraph 1, above:

‘At approximately 3:00 P.M. on July 19, 1953, an F-86 aircraft was observed flying over the Oak Ridge residential area, making circles at what appeared to the writer to be approximately 2,500 or 3,500 feet. The F-86 flew over the area in this manner for approximately ten or fifteen minutes. The writer, together with his wife, observed the aircraft through a pair of six power field glasses. After the aircraft flew in what appeared to be the direction of Knoxville, Tennessee, a black object moved out of a high white cloud, directly over the area the F-86 had been flying. This object began to travel, at a tremendous speed, in a large circle. This action on the part of the unknown object continued for at least five minutes. During the circle of this object, it appeared at times to be in the shape of a cigar and at other times round.’

‘This object was extremely black in color, having an appearance of a deep black metal exterior with a fine gloss. It did not leave a vapor trail or were there any lights of shine noticed. No sound was heard. The object flew east at a tremendous speed for what appeared to be approximately three miles where it stopped. The object was then joined by two more of these same objects. A formation similar to a spread ‘V’ was formed and the objects, at a tremendous speed flew in an eastward direction.’

3. Further information will be reported as received.

FOR THE CHIEF:

Captain, ASC Asst. Adjutant”

http://www.nicap.org/army_docs/army530719.htm

Related posts:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Oak+Ridge,+Tennessee

(wikimedia.org image)

Satellite photo of Oak Ridge, Tennessee (tageo.com)

(tageo.com photo)

UFO Case Directory: “Black Objects Maneuver Over Area nr F-86 July 19, 1953 Oak Ridge, Tennessee”

(NICAP.org)

The whole UFO case report:

“Fran Ridge:

July 19, 1953; Oak Ridge, Tennessee

At approximately 3:00 P.M., an F-86 aircraft was observed flying over the Oak Ridge residential area, making circles at what appeared to be approximately 2,500 or 3,500 feet. The F-86 flew over the area in this manner for approximately ten or fifteen minutes. The witness, together with his wife, observed the aircraft through a pair of six power field glasses. After the aircraft flew in what appeared to be the direction of Knoxville, Tennessee, a black object moved out of a high white cloud, directly over the area the F-86 had been flying. This object began to travel, at a tremendous speed, in a large circle. This action on the part of the unknown object continued for at least five minutes. During the circle of this object, it appeared at times to be in the shape of a cigar and at other times round. (Not listed in neither the BB Unknowns nor the updated catalog by Brad Sparks, this incident was mentioned in the MUFON UFO Journal, Issue No. 205.  An Army document was located and is presented by the link below with a transcript.)”

NICAP.org presents a U.S. government (U.S. Army) document that pertains to the case.

http://www.nicap.org/current/530719oakridge_dir.htm

Wikipedia article: “Oak Ridge, Tennessee”:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oak_Ridge,_Tennessee

Related posts:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=Oak+Ridge,+Tennessee

“Y-12” Area at Oak Ridge, Tennessee

(nicap.org photo)

UFO Article (Blog): “Holland, MI Radar-Visual UFO Case, part two.”

By Dr. Michael D. Swords, 26 April 2012

(The Big Study)

Quote from the article:

“In part two of this legendary saga, I'm going to try to sketch out how CUFOS and I got involved with the case. That involvement ultimately led to the publication of our findings in the article in the International UFO Reporter above. Those findings encompassed only a small, albeit vital, portion of the case, as other investigators allegedly were getting the mass of the on-the-ground fieldwork data. As said in part one, it turns out that those ‘other’ researchers were either NOT getting the fieldwork data or that data was never utilized and promulgated to the rest of us. We didn't know that at the time, of course.

CUFOS got word of this explosion of UFOs over Western Michigan at about the same time that everyone else did, but CUFOS was by that time in its history no longer an organization which did onsite fieldwork except in very special circumstances. Still, CUFOS Director, Mark Rodeghier, decided that this one sounded like we should at least we should dip our toe in the water. He knew that I was not a field researcher, but that I had a friend, an old NICAP member, who used to do that. So that's who he called. My friend began looking into this.

It was instantly obvious that a chaotic circus had immediately commenced. Witnesses, other than the Graves family, were being assaulted in paparazzi fashion and being turned off everywhere. The 911 operator told my friend that he knew of a few witnesses who had seen quite a bit, but who had told him that under no circumstances was he to let out their names. One guy was an ex-USAF colonel who lived south along the coast and who would have been a superior addition to the story. But no way.

The NOAA station manager had told everyone flat that there would be no interviewing any station personnel especially the night operator who took the 911 call. They wanted none of the grief. My friend made contact not only with them [briefly] but went on to talk with NOAA HQ in Washington DC. He made a good impression. Ultimately they called him back and said that he could have the only interview with the staff, BUT he would have to bring that WMU science professor with him when he came [he'd played my ‘PhD card’ to them over the phone]. So I was stuck with a field investigation if we wanted access.”

http://thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com/2012/04/holland-mi-radar-visual-ufo-case-part.html

I also reported about this article on 28 April 2012.

(2.bp.blogspot.com/thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com image)

Map of South West Michigan (michigan.org)

(michigan.org image)

UFO Article (Blog): “Holland MI Radar-Visual UFO Case, March 8, 1994, part one:”

By Dr. Michael D. Swords, 24 April 2012

(The Big Study)

Quote from the article:

“This entry if it ever sees the light of e-space is supposed to be about the Holland, MI radar case. That case is the only true UFO case of which I ever participated in an investigation. It surprised me when I searched this blog and found that I apparently never told the story. So, here goes.

The newspaper article at the top is one of probably hundreds which reported these events, and as you veterans know, it made international news due to the involvement of the Muskegon MI NOAA radar station which watched odd things on their scope in real time, all the while being recorded by the 911 operator in Ottawa County.

The map at the left [at least I hope that it ends up somewhere in the vicinity] shows the approximate locations of the NOAA radar station [at ‘A’], the most famous of the observations [by the Graves family, at the pink dewdrop], and several of the other reported sightings, marked with yellow circles, all of which were reported as happening at or VERY near 9:30pm. Rather astonishing. And I believe a little known fact about this case. It was as if Western Michigan ‘lit up’ with UFOs at the same time.”

http://thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com/2012/04/holland-mi-radar-visual-ufo-case-march.html

I also reported about this article on 26 April 2012.

Related posts:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=March+1994+–+Michigan

(2.bp.blogspot.com/thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com image)

Aerial view of Holland, Michigan

(photography-plus.com photo)

UFO News Article: “1994 Ottawa County UFO sightings remain unexplained”

21 July 2015

(Grand Haven Tribune, Michigan)

The article reports on the March 1994 South West Michigan UFO flap.

The March 1994 (most of the UFO sightings were made on

8 March) South West Michigan UFO sightings (involved about 300

witnesses) were made from Grand Rapids to the Lake Michigan

shoreline between Muskegon and South Haven.

National Weather Service radar registered the UFO activity.

http://www.grandhaventribune.com/News/2014/08/11/1994-Ottawa-County-UFO-sightings-remain-unexplained

Related posts:

realtvufos.blogspot.com/search?q=March+1994+–+Michigan

Map of South West Michigan (michigan.org)
(michigan.org image)

UFO Article (Blog): “NSA Fully Releases ‘UFOs and the IC Blind Spot’ Doc Following FOIA Request”

10 August 2017

(The UFO Trail (ufotrail.blogspot.com))

Quote from the article:

“We first explored the doc, composed at some point prior to 1979 by an unnamed author, here at The UFO Trail in the January blog post, NSA UFO Docs. Two redacted sections of the seven-page file were noted. The first section provided an example of how human response to perceived unusual phenomena can be detrimental, particularly from a military perspective. Images below show previously redacted pages on the left, with the now fully disclosed pages on the right.

Offering an example of detrimental responses, the author explained how a USAF technician ‘was engaged in first level traffic analysis and intercept processing against Soviet Bloc countries,’ when one of the countries began to report an unusual radar track. It was described as ‘a high flying fast moving object with an erratic flight pattern.’ Although identified as occasionally moving against the wind, the Bloc ‘began reporting the object as a balloon.’

‘The next Bloc nation picked up the object and continued the designation of balloon despite the erratic flight pattern, high speed, and against the wind maneuvers,’ the author continued.

It was further explained that the airman noted a variety of emotional reactions taking place among personnel within the American processing facility. Such reactions included ‘everyone was more edgy and silent than usual,’ as well as ‘aggressive and distracted responses’ to requests for clarification of some of the data.”

My comment:

The previously redacted part (the U.S. Air Force intelligence traffic intercept) of the NSA UFO document is very interesting (and revealing) on four counts.

1. The U.S. Air Force intercepted two Soviet Bloc countries’ intelligence traffic and surveilled how the Soviet Bloc countries’ military or intelligence (or both) communities handled a UFO incident.

2. The psychological reaction of the U.S. Air Force personnel shows that the people in the room were fully aware that the incident was a bona fide UFO incident (not a balloon incident).

3. The NSA was previously unwilling to declassify the portion of the document that deals with the U.S. Air Force’s surveillance of the UFO incident.

4. This is without a doubt not the only UFO incident information the U.S. military intelligence community has picked up while intercepting another country’s intelligence traffic.

http://ufotrail.blogspot.com/2017/08/nsa-fully-releases-ufos-and-ic-blind.html

(wikimedia.org image)

Aerial view of the National Security Agency, Fort Meade, Maryland (wikimedia.org) (wikimedia.org image)