Thursday, 12 March 2020
Private UFO Video:
“UFO over Malmstrom AFB”
Published: 3 February 2017
Source: x_xRICO_SUAVEx_x (YouTube channel)
This video appears to be a genuine UFO video.
The videographer talks with another eyewitness while he films the
unknown object. And this is the only UFO video which is presented on the
YouTube channel.
This is an extremely interesting video – since it is recorded at
Malmstrom Air Force Base, Great Falls ,
Montana .
The unknown object seems to be self-luminous and spherical shaped.
It is not known when the video was recorded.
Related posts:
(x_xRICO_SUAVEx_x (YouTube channel)/youtube.com image)
Aerial view of Malmstrom Air Force Base,
(wikimedia.org photo)
Website Searches:
Focus On UFO News Articles From
the Years 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990 and 1991
Website: Trove (National Library of Australia ,
Canberra , ACT, Australia ):
(Search term: UFO 1987)
(Flying Saucer 1987)
(UFO 1988)
(Flying Saucer 1988)
(UFO 1989)
(Flying Saucer 1989)
(UFO 1990)
(Flying Saucer 1990)
(UFO 1991)
(Flying Saucer 1991)
Related posts:
(National Library of Australia/wikimedia.org image)
UFO News Article:
“HOBBS CASE CITED –
If There’s Smoke--There’s Also UFO”
22 March 1969
(Lubbock Avalanche-Journal, Texas )
Source: NewspaperArchive.com
Quote from the article (the part of the article that focuses on the 2
June 1964, Hobbs , New Mexico , case):
“ALMOST FIVE years ago, a ‘big black top’ whooshed over the top of a
laundry in Hobbs
and burned a young boy so badly ‘he looked like something out of a horror
movie.’
‘You couldn’t see his eyes. His ears and mouth were turned wrong side
out. Just to look at him would make you want to go into hysteria.’
‘It Was No Fraud, No Hoax’
Mrs. Joann Idleman, 319 N. Lynch, Hobbs , reluctantly
recalled the incident in a telephone interview recently. ‘It was no fraud, no
hoax — this thing really happened,’ she said.
It happened to her son, Charles Keith Davis [was eight
years old at the time of the incident], now 13, on June 2, 1964. He can
remember vividly how the hissing Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) came at him
about 4 p.m. on a clear day.
Up to now, there has been little publicity.
* *
*
Makes Hobby Of UFO Study
C. A. ROBINSON, a Plainview businessman who claims he has been a UFO
‘nut’ for 20 years, says the Hobbs, Levelland and Lubbock Lights cases are
examples of ‘something people don’t want to understand and want to forget.’
‘The Air Force,’ he says, ‘has for 20 years attempted to cover up things
like that. What could you expect? It’s nothing but a whitewash job.’
Robinson came upon a brief resume of the Hobbs incident while perusing one of numerous
books he has read on UFOs. He said it disturbed him.
Young Davis had gone with his grandmother, Mrs. Frank Smith, to a
laundry the Smiths operated at 600
E. Marland St. on that unforgettable afternoon.
Relates Story Of ‘Black Top’
WITH NO hesitation in his voice, the teenager told The Avalanche-Journal
that he walked out a rear door of the laundry and went into the alley.
‘I looked up in the
sky and it came at me . . . it looked like a big black top . . . it burned me,
but the ground wasn’t touched or anything,’ he said.
‘The thing just came down and burned him,’ Mrs. Smith said. ‘I could see
him under it, but I didn’t know what it was. His hair was standing up on his
head, I couldn’t holler and he couldn’t either. He ran into the laundry and the
skin was falling off his face.’
Told Story At Hospital
AT THE hospital, Mrs. Smith told the story for the first time. ‘The
doctor didn’t pay me too much mind at first. Then I told him: ‘I know this
sounds kind of funny, but whatever burned him wasn’t anything in the laundry.’
Mrs. Smith, the only adult witness, said the UFO looked like a long
burner. ‘I would say it was about four feet tall, at was ablaze at the end of
it. Then there was more of a smoke — real dark carbon-like
smoke — that looked like it was coming out of oblong holes. I don’t know what
it was.’
The
boy’s T-shirt wasn’t burned. Mrs. Smith pulled the boy to her to put out the
fire. The blouse she was wearing wasn’t scorched anywhere.
Mrs.
Smith remembers hearing a ‘hissing sound, or whoosh, like something blew the
building.’
* * *
Youngster Laid Up Six Weeks
THE
YOUNGSTER was hospitalized for more than two weeks, and spent another month at
home recuperating. ‘They wouldn’t even let him have a mirror,’ his mother said.
The
family is still in the dark about what really happened.
THE
T-SHIRT, burned scrapings and Mrs. Smith’s blouse reportedly were sent to the
FBI in Washington
with the promise that the family would be advised of the results of the
analysis. The Air Force says the incident never has been ‘officially’ reported
to it.
‘They
told us they would let us know, but we’ve called them and sent letters and
haven’t heard a word. They just keep putting us off,’ Mrs. Idleman claimed.
Davis,
now an eight grader at Houston Junior High School in Hobbs , suffered second degree burns of the
face.
An
attending physician, who declined to be quoted by name, said ‘There was nothing
any different about the burns — the only question was: What in the world caused
them?’
DR.
JAMES E. McDonald, senior physicist at the Institute
of Atmospheric Physics at the University of Arizona and a leading authority on UFOs,
also has become interested in the case.
‘It’s
quite puzzling,’ he said. ‘It’s not one paralleled by similar cases. I’m most
inclined to take seriously the account given by the grandmother.’
McDonald
said Mrs. Smith was sincere, and expressed ‘horror, and an inability to move.’
‘It’s
exotic — such a bizarre case,’ he added.
Although
McDonald is puzzled by it, he said he had talked with enough people that ‘I
don’t see any basis for rejecting it at all.’
The
Plainview
businessman also was impressed by the case, and urged a full investigation of
it.”
newspaperarchive.com/avalanche-journal-mar-22-1969-p-1/
(Page 1)
newspaperarchive.com/avalanche-journal-mar-22-1969-p-11/
(Page 11)
Related posts:
(Page 1)
newspaperarchive.com/avalanche-journal-mar-22-1969-p-11/
(Page 11)
Related posts:
(Unknown newspaper article/David Marler image)
(Google photo)
(tageo.com photo)
Tuesday, 10 March 2020
UFO Radio Interview:
“David Marler, Forgotten
1964 UFO Burn Victim Case”
Streamed live: 3 March 2020
(Podcast UFO, Sebago ,
Maine )
Source: Martin Willis Live Shows (YouTube channel)
Video text:
“Guest David Marler with a premier discussion of his most recent research of a UFO Burn Victim Case - [Hobbs ] New Mexico
[2 June, daytime] 1964. There are early audio excerpts of an original witness and a bonus clip at the end of the show of an on camera interview with victim, Charles [Keith] Davis [was eight years old at the time of the incident] after he has tracked down 56 years after the incident. Triangle UFOs briefly discussed. Support the show: https://www.patreon.com/join/2959947
“Guest David Marler with a premier discussion of his most recent research of a UFO Burn Victim Case - [
[2 June, daytime] 1964. There are early audio excerpts of an original witness and a bonus clip at the end of the show of an on camera interview with victim, Charles [Keith] Davis [was eight years old at the time of the incident] after he has tracked down 56 years after the incident. Triangle UFOs briefly discussed. Support the show: https://www.patreon.com/join/2959947
BIO FOR DAVID MARLER:
https://davidmarlerufo.com/bio
DETAILS
UFO Burn Victim Case - New Mexico
1964
During an impressive wave of UFO sightings in New Mexico in 1964, one of the most credible
and well-documented accounts went hitherto unnoticed. Despite nationwide media
attention regarding other UFO experiences in New Mexico that year, the most
dramatic and horrific one was missed by all but a few local and regional news
outlets. This case involved not just the sighting of a UFO, but an apparent
attack and severe burning of an eight year old boy by an unidentified flying
object.
Although briefly referenced in the UFO literature at the time, this case
was essentially ignored by the UFO community as well as Air Force Project Blue
Book. After 55+ years, this case is finally seeing the light of day. Weaving
together archival audio recordings, newspaper accounts, as well as a
first-hand, on-camera interview done with the witness / burn victim years
later, we can now fully appreciate this case. Beyond that, it will be shown
that this was just one in a series of similar events that played out across the
United States
in 1964.
When evaluating UFO reports, sightings are one thing. Physical evidence
left by a UFO is another. But the burns inflicted on an eight year old boy is a
category unto itself. This is one of the more disturbing UFO encounters on-record.”
Related posts:
(Martin Willis Live Shows/youtube.com image)
(Unknown newspaper article/David Marler image)
(tageo.com photo)
UFO News Article:
“Niort. OVNI. Un phénomène lumineux
visible dans le ciel intrigue un Niortais”
(“Niort. UFO. A luminous phenomenon
visible in the sky intrigues a Niort resident”)
20 February 2020
(Ouest-France, Rennes ,
France )
A Niort , France , resident photographed a self-luminous,
elongated, unknown object on the evening of 15 February 2020, the article
reports.
Ouest-France presents the photo of the object.
English translation (by Google Translate):
Wikipedia article: “Niort ”:
Sunday, 8 March 2020
Possible UFO Video Footages:
Unknown Objects (Including Boomerang)
Filmed Over the Las Cruces, New Mexico, Area, March 2017
(SkySentinel, LLC, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne , Florida )
Source: MrMBB333 (YouTube channel)
In this video, the source says that he has monitored the SkySentinel cameras
for many years – and that he never before has seen the like of the objects
which can be seen in these videos (recorded in Las Cruces , New Mexico ).
In my opinion, the source presents two videos which possibly show UFOs.
The first possible UFO video shows an apparently large, self-luminous,
boomerang shaped object. The first video was filmed on 17 March 2017, at 11:37
p.m. (5:37 a.m. UTC).
The second possible UFO video shows two apparently
self-luminous objects which fly close together. The second
video was filmed on 30 March 2017, at 9:37 p.m. (3:37 a.m. UTC).
video was filmed on 30 March 2017, at 9:37 p.m. (3:37 a.m. UTC).
Wikipedia article: “Florida Institute of Technology”:
Related posts:

Boomerang shaped object filmed over the Las Cruces , New Mexico ,
area on 17 March 2017, at 11:37 p.m. (5:37 a.m. UTC)
(Florida Institute of Technology/youtube.com image)
(Florida Institute of Technology/youtube.com image)
Two unknown objects filmed over the Las Cruces , New Mexico ,
area on 30 March 2017, at 9:37 p.m. (3:37 a.m.
UTC)
(Florida Institute of Technology/youtube.com image)
(Florida Institute of Technology/youtube.com image)
(tageo.com photo)
UFO Report (Cases) (E-mail):
”Subject: Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant/
Triangle UFO reports nearby”
By Daniel Wilson, 2 September 2004
(NICAP.org)
Quote from the e-mail:
“HERE IS ANOTHER CASE OF A TROUBLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AND
TRIANGLE-SHAPED UFOS BEING REPORTED NEARBY.”
My comment:
In this e-mail, Daniel Wilson presents seven NUFORC UFO case reports. The
North Carolina UFO incidents occurred on 23 June 1998, 12 August 1999, 22
November 2000, 1 January 2002, 2 August 2002, 21 November 2002, 10 July 2003.
He also presents a news article (“Problems mount at Shearon Harris”)
that reports on the 2003 Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant emergency shutdowns.
The Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant is located in New Hill , North Carolina .
Wikipedia article: “Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant”:
Quote from the Wikipedia article:
“The Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant is a nuclear power plant with a
single Westinghouse designed pressurized-water nuclear reactor operated by Duke
Energy. It was named in honor of W. Shearon Harris, former president of
Carolina Power & Light (predecessor of Progress Energy Inc.).[2] Located in
New Hill, North Carolina, in the United States, about 20 miles (30 km ) southwest of Raleigh,
it generates 900 MWe, has a 523-foot (160 m ) natural draft cooling tower, and uses
Harris Lake for cooling. The reactor achieved criticality in January 1987 and
began providing power commercially on May 2 of that year.
The Shearon Harris site was originally designed for four reactors, but
cost and weakening demand despite a growing population resulted in three of the
reactors being canceled. The final cost approached $3.9B, including safety
upgrades mandated after the Three Mile Island
accident.
On November 16, 2006, the operator applied to the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) for a renewal and extension of the plant's operating
license.[3] The NRC granted the renewal on December 17, 2008, extending the
license from forty years to sixty.[4]”
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant. Unit 1. Copied from
the NRC web site, which is operated by the US government.
(text by Wikipedia) (wikimedia.org)
(wikimedia.org)
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant. New Hill, North Carolina
(Google photo)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






