(2.bp.blogspot.com/ufos-scientificresearch.blo
Saturday, 29 October 2016
UFO Article (Blog):
“Long lost Australian Department
of Defence UAP policy file found!”
By Keith Basterfield, 2 October 2016
(UFOs – scientific research, Campbelltown,
New South Wales, Australia)
Quote from the article:
“In a post dated 1 September 2016, I mentioned one outcome of a 2004 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Australian Department of Defence (DOD). This was, that in asking for a copy of numerous UAP files, they had advised me that one file, numbered AF84/3508 was unable to be located. Over the years since then, it never did turn up. Until now.
Recently, Melbourne researcher Paul Dean, forwarded me the results of one of his FOIA requests to the DOD. Among the various chains of internal back and forth emails responding to Paul’s request, I noted a reference to the long lost file. In November 2015, the file was stated to have been renumbered as 2007/1008750 and was then held at the DOD archives.”
(2.bp.blogspot.com/ufos-scientificresearch.blo
UFO Article (Blog):
“ ‘Cover-up’ or ‘foul-up?’ ”
By Keith Basterfield, 1 September 2016
(UFOs – scientific research, Campbelltown,
New South Wales, Australia)
Quote from the article:
“Introduction
The late Professor James E McDonald often debated the
issue of whether or not there was a UAP ‘cover-up’ or a ‘foul-up.’ By this, he
meant was there an orchestrated campaign by officialdom to withhold information
from the general public? Or, was there simply lack of care within government
administrative processes? Put simply, ‘their left hand did not know what their
right hand was doing.’
Australian examples
Since the days of McDonald, many other researchers,
including myself, have pondered the same question. I’ll provide some Australian
examples, from my own experience. Are they deliberate actions of the cover-up
of events; or just bureaucratic errors?
(1) In 2004, I was informed by the Australian
government Department of Transport that their file on the disappearance of
pilot Frederick Valentich had been destroyed. In actual fact, the file turned
up in October 2011, during a routine search of the holdings of the National
Archives of Australia.
(2) Later in the 2000’s, I supplied the Australian
Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), through the National Archives of
Australia (NAA), with a list of certain Australian UAP groups (including the
Queensland Flying Saucer Research Society (QFSRS)). I sought any files ASIO
held, on any of these groups. ASIO advised they held no such files. About a
year later, an ASIO file on the QFSRS turned up in the NAA.
A new anomaly
Today, another such example was found. In 2004, I
submitted an FOI request to the Australian Department of Defence (DOD) for a
series of UAP files, for which I provided a list of file numbers.
Included in this list was a file numbered AF 84/3508.
The DOD advised that they were unable to locate this file.”
(4.bp.blogspot.com/ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
image)
(1.bp.blogspot.com/ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
image)
UFO Article (Blog):
“UFOs and Government
now available as an e-book”
By Bill Chalker, 8 August 2016
(The OZ Files, Sydney, Australia)
(1.bp.blogspot.com/theozfiles.blogspot.com image)
UFO Article (Blog):
“ ‘OPREP-3’ – A Classified US Military
Reporting Channel For UFO Incidents? – Part 6”
By Paul Dean, 24 October 2016
(UFOs – Documenting The Evidence, Melbourne,
Australia)
Quote from the article:
“Previously, in Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 of this
series, I highlighted a number of occasions, during the 1970’s, where the US
military’s OPREP–3 reporting system has been used to alert top–level military
commands and components of provocative UFO activity near military bases. In
Part 4, I highlighted a category of OPREP–3 reporting which was specifically
designed for the North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) and Aerospace
Defence Command (ADCOM), to report general unknown radar tracks, and, ‘Unidentified
Flying Objects – UFOs.’ In Part 5, I moved on from the actual OPREP–3 reporting
of UFOs, and into the fallout that some of these post–Project Blue Book UFO
events caused within the US military and intelligence community. In summary,
what started out as a brief appraisal of the OPREP–3 reporting system,
specifically in relation to apparent UFO incidents, has morphed into a wider
study of declassified documents which deal with UFO case investigation,
evaluation and high level concern long after the US government relieved itself,
publicly, of the UFO headache.
In this Part 6, I will continue my study, this time
focusing on records released by the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and the
National Military Command Center (NMCC) in relation to a series of possible UFO
events over Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana. These events, which occurred in
November, 1975, followed similar aerial intrusions over Wurthsmith AFB,
Michigan, Loring AFB, Maine, and Falconbridge AFS in Ontario, Canada. Minot AFB
in North Dakota, and other bases were likewise affected by unidentified
activity during the same period. Most of these bases were assigned to the
United States Air Force’s (USAF) Strategic Air Command (SAC), and, had nuclear
weapons. This unusual chapter in UFO history only came to light after
researchers Barry Greenwood, Robert Todd, Lawrence Fawcett and Todd Zechel used
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to obtain pertinent records from military
agencies and commands.”
(3.bp.blogspot.com/ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com
images)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)