By Keith Basterfield, 15 August 2018
(UFOs – scientific research, Campbelltown,
Quote from the article:
“Background
In a blog post dated 28 June 2018, titled ‘New US congressional hearings on UFOs?’
I brought together several pieces of information which suggested that at least
one US Congressional Committee (and maybe more than one) was looking at
conducting hearings on the topic of UFOs, stimulated by the news about the
Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program/
Advanced Aerospace Threat and Identification Program (AAWSAP/AATIP.)
Advanced Aerospace Threat and Identification Program (AAWSAP/AATIP.)
In that blog post, I suggested three possibilities for
which committees might be involved:
1. The House of Representatives Armed Services
Committee.
2. The House of Representatives Science, Space and
technology Committee.
3. The Senate Armed Services Committee.
New research
Recently a group of collaborating researchers,
composed of Roger Glassel from Sweden ;
Curt Collins from the USA ;
Paul Dean from Melbourne , Australia , and myself from Adelaide , South Australia ,
have been following up on this subject area. The group has found a very
interesting item, in the US
‘Congressional Record.’
The ‘Congressional
Record’ is the official record of the proceedings and debates of the United
States Congress, published by the United States Government Publishing Office.
Volume 164, Number 56, dated Monday, April 9, 2018 of
the ‘Congressional Record’ page H3062 included the following text:
‘4381. A letter from the Chief, Congressional
Relations Division, Defense Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense,
transmitting a list of all products produced under the Advanced Aerospace
Threat and Identification Program contract for the Defense Intelligence Agency
to publish; to the Committee on Armed Services.’
The Team’s understanding, is that this means that the
reference to ‘Committee on Armed Services’ is to the House of Representatives
Armed Services Committee. Does this mean that there was a presentation of some
kind around April 2018? Are these ‘products’ back in the 2007-2012 era, or
later? Was this a review brought about by the New York Times article of 2017?
The finding of this item just raises further questions.”
Related posts:
(congress.gov/ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
image)