By Paul Dean, 6 February 2017
(UFOs – Documenting The Evidence, Melbourne , Australia )
Quote from the article:
“Previously, in Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4 of
this series, I looked at the US
military’s OPREP–3 reporting system, and, in particular, its use in alerting
top–echelon military commands of serious UFO incidents. In 1975, and again in
1978, the OPREP–3 system was used to convey urgent and current information
regarding perceived UFO activity near sensitive US military installations. In Part
5, Part 6 and Part 7 of this series, I moved away from the raw reporting of
UFOs, and began to discuss the US government’s response, concern, evaluation
and investigation of these well–documented, intrusive aerial events, which were
to become known as the ‘1970’s over flights,’ or variations of that apt title.
Through the release of hundreds of pages of records, via the utilisation of the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), researchers could piece together a
chronological narrative of UFO detection, reporting, response and
investigation. It was the efforts of Robert Todd, Barry Greenwood, Lawrence
Fawcett and Todd Zechel, and a few others, which saw government agencies,
especially military commands, release such records.
In Part 8, I discussed both the North American
Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) and the old Aerospace Defence Command’s
(ADCOM) role in, and response to, the ‘over flights,’ especially the events of
October and November, 1975. Specifically, I laid out NORAD and ADCOM’s handling
of FOI requests, which demonstrated clear inconsistencies, and possibly
deceitful conduct. More importantly, I presented the comparatively few NORAD
and ADCOM documents that were releasable, including so-called ‘Command
Directors Logs’ and ‘Senior Command Directors Logs.’ I also laid out a handful
of misleading statements made by NORAD regarding UFO’s generally. Finally, it
should be known that I will be discussing NORAD and ADCOM’s involvement in the ‘over
flights’ at greater length in my ongoing series titled ‘NORAD and the UFO
Smokescreen.’ In this edition of my series, I will present more NORAD and ADCOM
correspondence, including FOI action, plus further declassified records, all of
which are critical in assessing how these two massive organisations dealt with
the both the UFO events themselves, and the fallout that occurred later.
Briefly, NORAD was, and still is, a bi–national, United States–Canadian military organisation charged with aerospace warning and aerospace control overNorth America . Its
mission includes aircraft detection and monitoring, airspace management and
defensive air sovereignty. ADCOM, which was inactivated in 1986, was a major
command (MAJCOM) of the USAF, and was tasked with tactically defending the just
continental USA
only. As I have outlined previously, during the 1970’s and 1980’s, NORAD’s air
sovereignty responsibilities were divided into a number of geographical ‘NORAD
Regions,’ often shortened to ‘NR.’ Likewise, ADCOM’s air defence mission was similarly
divided into distinct ‘Air Divisions,’ frequently notated simply as ‘AD.’ ”
http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com/2017/02/oprep-3-classified-us-military.html
Briefly, NORAD was, and still is, a bi–national, United States–Canadian military organisation charged with aerospace warning and aerospace control over
http://ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com/2017/02/oprep-3-classified-us-military.html
(3.bp.blogspot.com/
ufos-documenting-the-evidence.blogspot.com
image)